Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fnl2l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-21T19:30:34.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Banu Öney  and
Aydin Yücesan Durgunoğlu
Banu Öney*
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi University
Aydin Yücesan Durgunoğlu
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Duluth
*
Aydin Y. Durgunoğlu, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812. email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate early literacy acquisition in a phonologically transparent orthography with regular letter-sound correspondences. It was considered that Turkish, with its systematic phonological and orthographic structure, would make different demands on the beginning reader than the languages used in many of the previous studies of literacy acquisition. First grade children were assessed using tests of phonological awareness, letter recognition, word and pseudoword recognition, spelling, syntactic awareness, and listening comprehension at the beginning of the school year. The impact of these factors on the development of word recognition, spelling, and reading comprehension was examined. The results strongly suggest that a phonologically transparent orthography fosters the early development of word recognition skills, and that phonological awareness contributes to word recognition in the early stages of reading acquisition. Once the children's word recognition performance is high, listening comprehension ability distinguishes the different levels of reading comprehension among children. These patterns of results were interpreted as reflecting the phonological and orthographic characteristics of the Turkish language and orthography.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adams, M. J. (1991). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A., & Slobin, D. I. (1986). The acquisition of Turkish. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The cross linguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 839–878). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organization as a possible cause of reading backwardness. Nature, 271, 746–747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, S. A., & Shankweiler, D. P. (Eds.). (1991). Phonological processes in literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., & Bruck, M. (1993). The effect of oral and written input on children's phonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, M. M. (1979). The early detection of reading difficulties. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.Google Scholar
Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. S., Katz, L., & Tola, G. (1988). Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Manrique, A. M. B., & Graminga, S. (1984). La segmentacion fonologica y silabica en ninos de prescolar y primero grado [Phonologic and syllabic segmentation in preschool and first grade children]. Lecturay Vida, 5, 4–13.Google Scholar
Dickinson, D. K., & Snow, C. E. (1987). Interrelationship among prereading and oral language skills in kindergarten from two social classes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durgunoğlu, A., Nagy, W. E., Hancin, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erguvanli-Taylan, E. (1987). The role of semantic features in Turkish word order. Folia Linguistica, 21, 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomax, R. G., & McGee, L. M. (1987). Young children's concepts about print and reading: Toward a model of reading acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 12, 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moustafa, M. (1995). Children's productive phonological recoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 464–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öney, B., & Goldman, S. R. (1984). Decoding and comprehension skills in Turkish and English: Effects of the regularity of grapheme-phoneme correspondences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 557–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shankweiler, D. (1989). How problems of comprehension are related to difficulties in decoding. In Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I. Y. (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I. Y. (1972). Misreading: A search for causes. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Mattingly, I. G. (Eds.). Language by ear and by eye: The relationship between speech and reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. (1991). The theoretical basis for relationships between language and literacy in development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 6, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Word recognition skill and reading ability. In Singer, M. H. (Ed.), Competent reader, disabled reader. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Freeman, D. J. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 278–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., & Baron, J. (1981). Segmental analysis ability: Development and relation to reading ability. In Waller, T. & Mackinnon, G. (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 3). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Tunmer, W. E. (1990). The role of language prediction skills in beginning reading. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 25, 95–114.Google Scholar
Tunmer, W. E., Herriman, M. L., & Nesdale, A. R. (1988). Metalinguistic abilities and beginning reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 134–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunmer, W. E., & Nesdale, A. R. (1985). Phonemic segmentation skills and beginning reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., & Torgeson, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimmer, H., & Hummer, P. (1990). How German-speaking first graders read and spell: Doubts on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaretsky, E. (1995). The influence of spoken language structure on phonological awareness in Russian and English-speaking prereaders. Paper presented at the meetings of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, San Francisco.Google Scholar