Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:13:46.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An invited article: Syntactic performance of hearing impaired and normal hearing individuals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Stephen P. Quigley  and
Cynthia M. King
Stephen P. Quigley*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Cynthia M. King
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
*
Stephen P. Quigley, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Speech and Hearing Science, 901 South Sixth Street, Champaign, IL 61820
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article describes two research programs on the syntactic abilities of hearing impaired and normal hearing individuals. The first program was concerned with describing some of the syntactic problems of deaf students in acquiring English structure; the second involved the construction of the Test of Syntactic Abilities and its application to deaf, hard of hearing, and normal hearing students in the United States, Canada, and Australia. This report has four objectives: (1) to summarize and integrate the findings of the two research programs, (2) to relate the findings to the literature on other populations, (3) to discuss strategies used by the research populations in handling English syntax, and (4) to discuss some applications of the findings to language development.

Type
Research Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , November 1980 , pp. 329 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American National Standards Institute. American National Standard Specifications for Audiometers (ANSI 53.6–1969). New York: American National Standards Institute, 1969.Google Scholar
Bartley, D., & Politzer, R.Practice-centered teacher training: Standard English for speakers of nonstandard dialects. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development, 1972.Google Scholar
Bell, H., Bird, A., & Burroughs-Keith, J.Relative clause development in school-age children. Paper presented at the American Speech and Hearing Association Convention, Chicago, 1977.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. The acquisition of negation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, 1967.Google Scholar
Bever, T. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: John Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
Brasel, K., & Quigley, S.Influence of certain language and communication environments in early childhood on the development of language in deaf individuals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1977, 20, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R.A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J.Acquisition of English auxiliaries by native Spanish speakers. TESOL Quarterly, 12 1975, 9, 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A.A sociolinguistic approach to bilingual education. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1975.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J., & de Villiers, P.Language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M.Goofing: An indication of child second language learning strategies. Language Learning, 1972, 22, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M.Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 1974, 24, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S.Is second language learning like the first? TESOL Quarterly, 1972, 8, 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, L.A linguistic definition of language delay: Evidence from the acquisition of aux. Paper presented at the Summer 1977 meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 1977.Google Scholar
Hatch, E.Four experimental studies in syntax of young children (Technical Report 11). Southwest Regional Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, Inglewood, California, 1969.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Chavez, Eduardo. Early code separation in the acquisition of English by Spanish speaking children. Paper presented at the Stanford Child Language Research Forum, Stanford, California, 1972.Google Scholar
Jones, M., & Quigley, S.The acquisition of question formation in English and American sign language by two hearing children of deaf parents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1979, 44, 196–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, C. The syntactic abilities of deaf and hearing students learning English as a first or second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1980.Google Scholar
Klima, E., & Bellugi, U. Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In Lyons, J. and Wales, R. (Eds.), Psycholinguistic Papers, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Lance, D.The codes of the Spanish-English bilingual. TESOL Quarterly, 1970, 4, 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. The relation of the reliability of multiple-choice tests to the distribution of item difficulties. Psychometrika. 06 1952, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menyuk, P.Syntactic structures in the language of children. Child Development, 1963, 34, 407–422.Google ScholarPubMed
Payne, J. A.The use of the Test of Syntactic Abilities with students learning English as a second language. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1980.Google Scholar
Politzer, R., & Ramirez, A.An error analysis of the spoken English of Mexican-American pupils in a bilingual school and a monolingual school. Language Learning, 1973, 23, 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, D. J., & Quigley, S. P.Deaf children's acquisition of the passive voice. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1973, 16, 5–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quigley, S. P., Montanelli, D. S., & Wilbur, R. B.Some aspects of the verb system in the language of deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1976, 19, 536–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quigley, S. P., Smith, H. L., & Wilbur, R. B.Comprehension of relativized sentences by deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1974, 17, 325–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quigley, S., Steinkamp, M., Power, D., & Jones, B.Test of Syntactic Abilities. Beaverton, Ore.: Dormac, 1978.Google Scholar
Quigley, S. P., Wilbur, R. B., & Montanelli, D. S.Question formation in the language of deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1974, 17, 699–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quigley, S. P., Wilbur, R. B., & Montanelli, D. S.Complement structures in the language of deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1976, 19, 448–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quigley, S. P., Wilbur, R. B., Power, D. J., Montanelli, D. S., & Steinkamp, M.Syntactic structures in the language of deaf children. Urbana, Ill.: Institute for Child Behavior and Development, 1976.Google Scholar
Ravem, R. The development of wh-questions in first and second language learners. In Richards, J. (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language learning. New York: Longmans, Green, 1974.Google Scholar
Richards, J. Error analysis and second language strategies. In Oiler, J. and Richards, J. (Eds.), Focus on the learner: Pragmatic perspectives for the language teacher. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1973.Google Scholar
A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. In Richards, J. (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. London: Longman, 1974.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. T., & Clarke, B. R. Psychometric characteristics of the Test of Syntactic Abilities Screening Test. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1980.Google Scholar
Schachter, J.An error in error analysis. Language Learning, 1978, 24, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, P. Deaf children's comprehension and production of sentence transformations and verb tenses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1968.Google Scholar
Scott, M., & Tucker, G.Error analysis and English-language strategies of Arab students. Language Learning, 1974, 24, 69–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. B., Montanelli, D. S., & Quigley, S. P.Pronominalization in the language of deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1976, 19, 120–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilbur, R. B., Quigley, S. P., & Montanelli, D. S.Conjoined structures in the written language of deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1975, 18, 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar