Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T12:06:06.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonality and critical community size for infectious diseases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

R. M. Cullen ,
A. Korobeinikov  and
W. J. Walker
R. M. Cullen
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
A. Korobeinikov
Affiliation:
Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, 24–29 St Giles', Oxford OX1 3LB, UK; e-mail: [email protected].
W. J. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The endemicity of infectious diseases is investigated from a deterministic viewpoint. Sustained oscillation of infectives is often due to seasonal effects which may be related to climatic changes. For example the transmission of the measles virus by droplets is enhanced in cooler, more humid seasons. In many countries the onset of cooler, more humid weather coincides with the increased aggregation of people and the seasonal effect can be exacerbated. In this paper we consider non-autonomous compartmental epidemiological models and demonstrate that the critical community size phenomenon may be associated with the seasonal variation in the disease propagation. This approach is applicable to both the prevaccination phenomenon of critical community size and the current goal of worldwide elimination of measles by vaccination.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , April 2003 , pp. 501 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2003

References

[1]Anderson, R. M. and May, R. M., “The invasion, persistence and spread of infectious diseases within animal and plant communities”, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc.B 314 (1986) 533–570.Google Scholar
[2]Anderson, R. M. and May, R. M., Infectious diseases in humans—dynamics and control (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991).Google Scholar
[3]Bartlett, M. S., “The critical community size for measles in the United States”, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 123 (1960) 37–44.Google Scholar
[4]Black, F. L., “Measles endemicity in insular populations: critical community size and its implications”, J. Theor. Biol. 11 (1966) 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Cullen, R. M., Ellis, N. D. and Walker, W. J., “A model of measles endemicity”, Nonlinear Anal. 35 (1999) 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Cullen, R. M. and Walker, W. J., “Measles epidemics 1949–91: the impact of mass immunisation in New Zealand”, N. Z. Med. J. 109 (1996) 400–402.Google ScholarPubMed
[7]Hassell, M. P., The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1978).Google Scholar
[8]Hoppensteadt, F. C., Mathematical theories of populations, demographics, genetics and epidemics (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1975).Google Scholar
[9]Hoppensteadt, F. C., Mathematics in medicine and the life sciences (Springer, New York, 1992).Google Scholar
[10]Keeling, M. J. and Grenfell, B. T., “Disease extinction and community size: Modeling the persistence of measles”, Science 275 (1997) 65–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[11]Kuznetsov, Y. A., Elements of applied bifurcation theory (Springer, New York, 1995).Google Scholar
[12]May, R. M., “Necessity and chance: Deterministic chaos in ecology and evolution”, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 32 (1995) 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Pielou, E. C., An introduction to mathematical ecology (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969).Google Scholar
[14]Soper, H. E., “Interpretation of periodicity in disease-prevalence”, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 92 (1929) 34–73.Google Scholar