Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:22:26.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The first integrals and their Lie algebra of the most general autonomous Hamiltonian of the form H = T + V possessing a Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

V. M. Gorringe  and
P. G. L. Leach
V. M. Gorringe
Affiliation:
Center for Nonlinear Studies and Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, University of the Witwatersrand, P.O. WITS, 2050, South Africa.
P. G. L. Leach
Affiliation:
Center for Nonlinear Studies and Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, University of the Witwatersrand, P.O. WITS, 2050, South Africa.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In two dimensions it is found that the most general autonomous Hamiltonian possessing a Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector is The Poisson bracket of the two components of this vector leads to a third first-integral, cubic in the momenta. The Lie algebra of the three integrals under the operation of the Poisson bracket closes, and is shown to be so(3) for negative energy and so(2, 1) for positive energy. In the case of zero energy, the algebra is W(3, 1). The result does not have a three-dimensional analogue, apart from the usual Kepler problem.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , April 1993 , pp. 511 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1993

References

[1] Collinson, C. D., “Investigation of planetary orbits using the Lenz-Runge vector”, Bull. Inst. Math. Applies. 13 (1973) 377–378.Google Scholar
[2] Fradkin, D. M., “Existence of the dynamic symmetries 04 and SU 3 for all classical central potential problems”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 37 (1967) 793–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Herbert Goldstein, “Prehistory of the ‘Runge-Lenz’ vector”, Am. J. Phys. 43 (1975) 737–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Herbert Goldstein, “More on the prehistory of the Laplace or Runge-Lenz vector”, Am. J. Phys. 44 (1976) 1123–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Gorringe, V. M. and Leach, P. G. L., “Conserved vectors for the autonomous system ”, Physica 27D (1987) 243–248.Google Scholar
[6] Hall, L. S., “A theory of exact and approximate configurational invariants”, Physica 8D (1983) 90–113.Google Scholar
[7] Leach, P. G. L., “A further note on the Hénon-Heiles problem”, J. Math. Phys. 22 (1981) 679–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Leach, P. G. L., “Applications of the Lie theory of extended groups in Hamiltonian mechanics: the oscillator and the Kepler problem”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. (Ser B) 23 (1981) 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Leach, P. G. L. and Gorringe, V. M., “Variations on Newton's Keplerian theme”, S. A. J. Sci. 83 (1987) 550–555.Google Scholar
[10] Leach, P. G. L. and Gorringe, V. M., “A conserved Laplace-Runge-Lenz-like vector for a class of three-dimensional motions”, Phys. Lett. 133A (1988) 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Prince, G. E. and Eliezer, C. J. “On the Lie symmetries of the classical Kepler problem”, J. Phys. A 14 (1981) 587–596.Google Scholar
[12] Sarlet, W., Leach, P. G. L. and Cantrijn, F., “First integrals versus configurational invariants and a weak form of complete integrability”, Physica 17D (1985) 87–98.Google Scholar
[13] Sen, Tanaji, “A class of integrable potentials”, J. Math. Phys. 28 (1987) 2841–2850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Thompson, G., “Second-order systems with Runge-Lenz-type vectors”, Lett. Math. Phys. 14 (1987) 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Whittaker, E. T., “A treatise on the analytical dynamics of particles and rigid bodies”, (Dover, New York, 1944) p. 331.Google Scholar
[16] Whittaker, op cit page 320 gives the reference Poisson, S. D., J de l' École Polyt. 8 (1809) 266.Google Scholar
[17] Yoshida, Takeshi “Determination of the generalized Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector by an inverse matrix method”, Am. J. Phys. 57 (1989) 376–377.Google Scholar