Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:01:25.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversity sensitivity and multimodal Bayesian statistical analysis by relative entropy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Roy B. Leipnik  and
C. E. M. Pearce
Roy B. Leipnik
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106–3080, USA; e-mail: [email protected].
C. E. M. Pearce
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia; e-mail: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A list of recognised social diversities is assembled, including those used in social action programmes in the USA. Responses to diversity are discussed and diversity sensitivity defined as the derivative of response with respect to a defining parameter of a diversity distribution. Rewards (or penalties) for diversity are listed also; sensitivities to the responses to the rewards for diversity are called diversity sensitivities of the second kind. The statistics of bimodal and multimodal distributions are discussed, including the parametric estimation of such distributions by mixtures of multivariate normal distributions. An example is considered in detail.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , October 2005 , pp. 277 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2005

References

[1]Cox, D. R., “Notes on the analysis of mixed frequency distributions”, Brit. J. Math. Statist. Psych. 19 (1966) 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. and Rubin, D. B., “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm”, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 39 (1977) 1–38.Google Scholar
[3]Everitt, R. S. and Hand, D. J., Finite Mixture Distributions (Chapman and Hall, London, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Fix, E. and Hodges, J., “Discriminatory analysis”, Report 4 Project 21–49–004, USAF School of Aviation Medicine, (1951).Google Scholar
[5]Hand, D. J., Discrimination and Classification (J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1981).Google Scholar
[6]Hand, D. J., Kernel Discriminant Analysis (Research Studies Press/Wiley, Chichester, 1982).Google Scholar
[7]Hasselblad, V., “Estimation of parameters on a mixture of normal distributions”, Technometrics 8 (1966) 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Koopmans, T. C., Rubin, H. and Leipnik, R. B., “Measuring the equation systems of dynamic economics”, in Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models (ed. Koopmans, T. J.), (Wiley and Sons, New York, 1950) 53–237.Google Scholar
[9]Parzen, E., “On the estimation of a probability function”, Ann. Math. Statist. 33 (1962) 1067–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Rao, P., Menjoge, S. and Rao, P. S. R. S., “Improved estimators with the weighted and compounded loss functions”, Commun. Statist. A – Theory, Methods 12 (1983) 131–139.Google Scholar
[11]Rosenblatt, M., “Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function”, Ann. Math. Statist. 27 (1956) 832–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Silverman, B. W., “Using kernel density estimates to investigate multimodality”, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 43 (1981) 97–99.Google Scholar
[13]Silverman, B. W., Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis (Chapman and Hall, London, 1986).Google Scholar
[14]Wolfe, J. H., “Pattern clustering by multivariate mixture analysis”, Multivar. Behavioral Res. 5 (1970) 329–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed