Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:28:09.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AMBIGUITY IN THE DETERMINATION OF THE FREE ENERGY ASSOCIATED WITH THE CRITICAL CIRCLE MAP

Part of: Infinite-dimensional dissipative dynamical systems Dynamical systems with hyperbolic behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

BRIAN G. KENNY  and
TONY W. DIXON
BRIAN G. KENNY*
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Physics, Research School of Physical Science and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia (email: [email protected])
TONY W. DIXON
Affiliation:
Formerly at School of Mathematics & Statistics, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia (email: [email protected])
*
✉For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider a simple model to describe the widths of the mode-locked intervals for the critical circle map. By using two different partitions of the rational numbers based on Farey series and Farey tree levels, respectively, we calculate the free energy analytically at selected points for each partition. It emerges that the result of the calculation depends on the method of partition. An implication of this finding is that the generalized dimensions Dq are different for the two types of partition except when q=0; that is, only the Hausdorff dimension is the same in both cases.

Keywords

circle mapsthermodynamic formalismFarey treesFarey series

MSC classification

Secondary: 37D35: Thermodynamic formalism, variational principles, equilibrium states 37L30: Attractors and their dimensions, Lyapunov exponents
Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , October 2008 , pp. 177 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2009

References

[1]Artuso, R., Cvitanović, P. and Kenny, B. G., “Phase transitions on strange irrational sets”, Phys. Rev. A 39 (1989) 268–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[2]Cvitanović, P., Private communication; also see [1].Google Scholar
[3]Cvitanović, P., Shraiman, B. and Soderberg, B., “Scaling laws for mode-locking in circle maps”, Phys. Scr. 32 (1985) 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Feigenbaum, M. J., “Some characterizations of strange sets”, J. Stat. Phys. 46 (1987) 919–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Feigenbaum, M. J., “Scaling spectra and return times of dynamical systems”, J. Stat. Phys. 46 (1987) 925–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Halsey, T. C., Jensen, M. H., Kadanoff, L. P., Procaccia, I. and Shraiman, B. I., “Fractal measures and their singularities: the characterization of strange sets”, Phys. Rev. A 34 (1986) 1141–1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[7]Hardy, G. H. and Wright, E. M., Theory of numbers (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1938).Google Scholar
[8]Hentschel, H. G. E. and Procaccia, I., “The infinite number of generalized dimensions of fractals and strange attractors”, Phys. D 8 (1983) 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Jensen, M. H., Bak, P. and Bohr, T., “Complete devil’s staircase, fractal dimension, and universality of mode-locking structure in the circle map”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 1637–1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Jensen, M. H., Bak, P. and Bohr, T., “Transition to chaos by interaction of resonances in dissipative systems. I. Circle maps”, Phys. Rev. A 30 (1984) 1960–1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Lanford, O. E., “A numerical study of the likelihood of phase-locking”, Phys. D 14 (1985) 403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Ruelle, D., Statistical mechanics, thermodynamic formalism (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1978).Google Scholar
[13]Vul, E. B., Sinai, Ya. G. and Khanin, K. M., “Feigenbaum universality and thermodynamic formalism”, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 39 (1984) 3–37.Google Scholar
[14]Vul, E. B., Sinai, Ya. G. and Khanin, K. M., Russian Math. Surveys 39 (1984) 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar