Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:15:13.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Through seeing stones: Maya epigraphy as a mature discipline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2016

Stephen Houston  and
Simon Martin
Stephen Houston
Affiliation:
Anthropology Department, Brown University, Box 1921, Providence RI 02912, USA (Email: [email protected])
Simon Martin
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania Museum, 3260 South Street, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA (Email: simonm3@ sas.upenn.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Maya script—the most elaborate and extensive system of native writing in the New World—was in active use across the Yucatán Peninsula from 300 BC–AD 1700. Maya epigraphy began in the late nineteenth century, developing through the efforts of key figures, often with oblique approaches from other disciplines. Today, the research landscape is increasingly virtual; new discoveries have been combined with greater precision in translation, providing unique access to the complex interactions of Maya society, where the elite shared a language across political boundaries that was incomprehensible to most of their subjects.

Keywords

MesoamericaMayaClassic periodepigraphylanguage
Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 90 , Issue 350 , April 2016 , pp. 443 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrén, A. 1998. Between artifacts and texts: historical archaeology in global perspective. New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9409-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, Q. 2003. Fu Shan's world: the transformation of Chinese calligraphy in the seventeenth century (Harvard East Asian Monographs 220). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar
Berlin, H. 1958. El glifo ‘emblema’ en las inscripciones Mayas. Journal de la Société des Américanistes 47: 111–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/jsa.1958.1153 Google Scholar
Boot, E. 2009. The updated preliminary Classic Maya—English, English—Classic Maya vocabulary of hieroglyphic readings. Mesoweb Resources. Available at: www.mesoweb.com/resources/vocabulary/Vocabulary-2009.01.pdf (accessed 2 February 2016).Google Scholar
Brady, J.E. & Prufer, K.M.. 1999. Caves and crystalmancy: evidence for the use of crystals in ancient Maya religion. Journal of Anthropological Research 55: 129–44.Google Scholar
Canuto, M. & Barrientos, T.. 2013. The importance of La Corona. La Corona Notes 1 (1). Mesoweb. Available at: www.mesoweb.com/LaCorona/LaCoronaNotes01.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2016).Google Scholar
Carver, M. 2002. Marriages of true minds: archaeology with texts, in Cunliffe, B., Davies, W. & Renfrew, C. (ed.) Archaeology: the widening debate: 465−96. Oxford: Oxford University Press & the British Academy.Google Scholar
Chippindale, C., Hammond, N. & Sabloff, J.A.. 1988. The archaeology of Maya decipherment. Antiquity 62: 119–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00073580 Google Scholar
Coe, M.D. 1973. The Maya scribe and his world. New York: Grolier Club.Google Scholar
Coe, M.D. 1989. The hero twins: myth and image, in Kerr, J. (ed.) The Maya vase book: a corpus of rollout photographs of Maya vases, volume 1: 161−84. New York: Kerr Associates.Google Scholar
Coe, M.D. 2012. Breaking the Maya code. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Colas, P.R. 2004. Sinn und bedeutung Klassischer Maya-personennamen: typologische analyse von anthroponymphrasen in den hieroglypheninschriften der Klassischen Maya-Kultur als beitrag zur allgemeinen onomastik (Acta Mesoamericana 15). Markt Schwaben: Anton Saurwein.Google Scholar
Förstemann, E.W. 1887–1898. Zur entzifferung der Mayahandschriften. Dresden: Druck von C. Heinrich.Google Scholar
Freidel, D., Schele, L. & Parker, J.. 1993. Maya cosmos: three thousand years on the shaman's path. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. 1957. Egyptian grammar: being an introduction to the study of hieroglyphs. Oxford: Griffith Institute.Google Scholar
Hanks, W.F. 1990. Referential practice: language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Houston, S. 2004. Writing in early Mesoamerica, in Houston, S. (ed.) The first writing: script invention as history and process: 274−309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houston, S. 2014. The life within: Classic Maya and the matter of permanence. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Houston, S. & Stuart, D.. 1996. Of gods, glyphs and kings: divinity and rulership among the Classic Maya. Antiquity 70: 289–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00083289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, S., Robertson, J. & Stuart, D.. 2000. The language of Classic Maya inscriptions. Current Anthropology 41: 321–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/300142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, S., Chinchilla Mazariegos, O. & Stuart, D.. 2001. Introduction, in Houston, S., Chinchilla Mazariegos, O. & Stuart, D. (ed.) The decipherment of ancient Maya writing: 3–19. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Houston, S., Escobedo, H., Child, M., Golden, C. & Muñoz, R.. 2003. The moral community: Maya settlement transformation at Piedras Negras, Guatemala, in Smith, M.L. (ed.) The social construction of ancient cities: 212–53. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Houston, S., Stuart, D. & Robertson, J.. 2004. Disharmony in Maya hieroglyphic writing: linguistic change and continuity in Classic society, in Wichmann, S. (ed.) The linguistics of Maya writing: 83–101. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Houston, S., Stuart, D. & Taube, K.A.. 2006. The memory of bones: body, being, and experience among the Classic Maya. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Houston, S., Newman, S., Román, E. & Garrison, T.. 2015. Temple of the Night Sun: a royal tomb at El Diablo, Guatemala. San Francisco (CA): Precolumbia Mesoweb.Google Scholar
Knorosov, Y. 1952. Drevnyaya pis'mennost’ Tsentral'noy Ameriki. Sovetskaya Etnografiya 3: 100–18.Google Scholar
Lacadena, A. 2012. Syntactic inversion (hyperbaton) as a literary device in Maya hieroglyphic texts, in Hull, K. & Carrasco, M. (ed.) Parallel worlds: genre, discourse, and poetics in contemporary, colonial, and Classic Maya literature: 45–75. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Martin, S. 2005. Of snakes and bats: shifting identities at Calakmul. The PARI Journal 6: 5–15.Google Scholar
Martin, S. 2006. Cacao in ancient Maya religion: first fruit from the maize tree and other tales from the underworld, in McNeil, C. (ed.) Chocolate in Mesoamerica: a cultural history of cacao: 154–83. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Martin, S. & Grube, N.. 1995. Maya superstates. Archaeology 48: 41–46.Google Scholar
Martin, S. & Grube, N.. 2000. Chronicle of the Maya kings and queens: deciphering the dynasties of the ancient Maya. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Mathews, P. 1997. La escultura de Yaxchilán. Mexico, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Mathews, P. & Schele, L.. 1974. Lords of Palenque: the glyphic evidence, in Greene Robertson, M. (ed.) Primera mesa redonda de Palenque, part I: 63–75. Pebble Beach (CA): Robert Louis Stevenson School.Google Scholar
Prager, C. 2014. Übernatürliche Akteure in der Klassischen Maya-Religion: eine Untersuchung zu intrakultureller Variation und Stabilität am Beispiedes k'uh ‘Götter’-Konzepts in den religiösen Vorstellungen und Überzeugungen Klassischer Maya-Eliten (250–900 n.Chr.). Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Bonn.Google Scholar
Proskouriakoff, T. 1960. Historical implications of a pattern of dates at Piedras Negras, Guatemala. American Antiquity 25: 454–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/276633 Google Scholar
Proskouriakoff, T. 1993. Maya history. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ringle, W. 1988. Of mice and monkeys: the value and meaning of T1016, the God C hieroglyph (Research Reports on Ancient Maya Writing 18). Washington, D.C.: Center for Maya Research.Google Scholar
Robertson, J., Houston, S. & Stuart, D.. 2004. Tense and aspect in Maya hieroglyphic script, in Wichmann, S. (ed.) The linguistics of Maya writing: 259–89. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Schele, L. & Freidel, D.. 1990. A forest of kings: the untold story of the ancient Maya. New York: William Morrow & Company.Google Scholar
Schele, L. & Mathews, P.. 1979. The bodega of Palenque. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
Schele, L. & Miller, M.E.. 1986. The blood of kings: dynasty and ritual in Maya art. Fort Worth (TX): Kimbell Art Museum.Google Scholar
Sharer, R.J. 1999. Archaeology and history in the royal acropolis, Copan, Honduras. Expedition 41: 8–15.Google Scholar
Stone, A. & Zender, M.. 2011. Reading Maya art: a hieroglyphic guide to ancient Maya painting and sculpture. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Stuart, D. 1987. Ten phonetic syllables (Research Reports on Ancient Maya Writing 14). Washington, D.C.: Center for Maya Research.Google Scholar
Stuart, D. 1996. Kings of stone: a consideration of stelae in Maya ritual and representation. Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics 29–30: 149−71.Google Scholar
Stuart, D. 2007. The origin of Copan's founder. Maya decipherment. Available at: https://decipherment.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/the-origin-of-copans-founder/ (accessed 2 February 2016).Google Scholar
Stuart, D. 2008. When archaeology is destruction. Maya decipherment. Available at: https://decipherment.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/when-archaeology-is-destruction/ (accessed 2 February 2016).Google Scholar
Stuart, D. 2010. Shining stones: observations on the ritual meaning of early Maya stelae, in Guernsey, J., Clark, J. & Arroyo, B. (ed.) The place of stone monuments: context, use, and meaning in Mesoamerica's preclassic transition: 283–98. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
Stuart, D. 2012. The order of days: unlocking the secrets of the ancient Maya. New York: Three Rivers.Google Scholar
Taube, K.A. 1992. Major gods of ancient Yucatan (Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology 32). Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
Tokovinine, A. 2013. Place and identity in Classic Maya narratives (Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology 37). Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
Tokovinine, A. & Fash, B.. 2008. Scanning history: the corpus of Maya hieroglyphic inscriptions tests a 3-D scanner in the field. Symbols Spring: 17–20.Google Scholar
Tozzer, A.M. 1907. Ernst Förstemann. American Anthropologist 9: 153–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1907.9.1.02a00100 Google Scholar
Zender, M. 2014. On the reading of three Classic Maya portrait glyphs. The PARI Journal 15: 1–14.Google Scholar