Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:34:48.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Special section Dynamic landscapes and socio-political process: the topography of anthropogenic environments in global perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Christopher T. Fisher  and
Tina L. Thurston
Christopher T. Fisher
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin, Madison WI 53706-1393, USA
Tina L. Thurston
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Social Work and Anthropology, Baylor University, Waco TX 76798, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sander Van Der Leeuw, in his recent plenary address at the 1998 Society for American Archaeology Meetings, suggested that archaeology as a discipline has moved its emphasis from site to settlement pattern, and now to the landscape. Though a landscape focus is not new, especially for the social sciences (Coones 1994; Cosgrove 1984; Glacken 1967; Jackson 1994}, the landscape approach in archaeology (Wagstaff 1987) is still in its infancy.

Keywords

landscapeslandscape archaeologyclimate changeintensificationland-usepolitical ecologynew ecologyenvironmental history
Type
Special section
Information
Antiquity , Volume 73 , Issue 281 , September 1999 , pp. 630 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashmore, W. & Bernard, K. (ed.). 1999. The archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Balée, W. (ed.). 1998. Advances in historical ecology. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bender, B. 1992. Theorizing landscape and the prehistoric landscapes of Stonehenge, Man 27: 735–55.Google Scholar
Bender, B. (Ed.). 1993. Landscape politics and perspective. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Bender, B. 1998. Stonehenge: making space. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Blaikie, P.M. & Brookfield, H.C. (ed.). 1987. Land degradation and society. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Botkin, D.B. 1990. Discordant harmonies: a new ecology for the twenty first century. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 1998a. The significance of monuments: on the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 1998b. Rock art and the prehistory of Atlantic Europe: signing the land. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bryant, R. 1992. Political ecology: an emerging research agenda in third world studies, Political Geography 11: 12–36.Google Scholar
Coones, P. 1985. One landscape or many? A geographical perspective, Landscape History 25: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, D.E. 1984. Social formation and symbolic landscape. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Cronin, W. (ed.). 1996. Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. New York (NY): Norton.Google Scholar
Crumley, C.L. (ed.). 1994. Historical ecology: cultural knowledge and changing landscapes. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Crumley, C. & Marquardt, W.H. (ed.). 1987. Regional dynamics: Burgundian landscapes in historical perspective. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Descola, P. & Pálsson, G. (ed.). 1996. Nature and society: anthropological perspectives. New York (NY): Routledge.Google Scholar
Erickson, C.L. 1993. The social organization of prehispanic raised field agriculture in the Lake Titicaca Basin, in Scarborough, V. & Isaac, B. (ed.). Economic aspects of water management in the prehispanic New World: 369–426. Greenwich (CT): JAI Press. Research in Economic Anthropology Supplement 7.Google Scholar
Glacken, J. 1967. Traces on the Rhodian shore: nature and culture in western thought from ancient times to the end of the eighteenth century. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.B. 1994. A sense of place, a sense of time. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ingerson, A.E. 1994. Tracking and testing the nature/culture dichotomy in practice, in Crumley, (ed.): 43–67.Google Scholar
Kirch, P.V. & Hunt, T.L. (ed.). 1997. Historical ecology in the Pacific islands: prehistoric environmental and landscape change. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippard, L.R. 1997. The lure of the local: senses of place in a multicentered society. New York (NY): The New Press.Google Scholar
McGlade, J. 1995. Archaeology and the ecodynamics of human-modified landscapes, Antiquity 69: 113–32.Google Scholar
Rossignol, J. & Wandsnider, L. (ed.). 1992. Space, time, and archaeological landscapes. New York (NY): Plenum.Google Scholar
Schama, S. 1995. Landscape and memory. New York (NY): Random House.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1996. Time, culture and identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1994. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths and monuments. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wagstaff, J.M. 1987. Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Whitehead, N. 1998. Ecological history and historical ecology: diachronic modeling versus historical explanation, in Balée, (ed.): 30–41.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, K. 1994. Human geography and the ‘New Ecology’: the prospect and promise of integration, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84: 108–25.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, K. & Young, K.R.. 1998. Introduction: The geographical nature of landscape change, in Zimmerer, & Young, (ed.), Nature’s geography: new lessons for conservation in developing countries: 3–35. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar