Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:34:37.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The southwest Fen dyke survey project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

C.A.I. French
C.A.I. French*
Affiliation:
Fenland Archaeological Trust, Sycamore Farm, Seadyke Bank, Wisbech St Mary, Wisbech PE13 4SD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special section: Survey, environment and excavation in the English Fenland
Information
Antiquity , Volume 62 , Issue 235 , June 1988 , pp. 343 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avery, B.W. 1980. Soil classification for England and Wales. Harpenden: Soil Survey. Technical Monograph 14.Google Scholar
Bouma, J. 1969. Microstructure and stability of two sandy loam soils with different soil management. Wageningen: Agricultural Research Report. Number 724.Google Scholar
Bullock, P., Murphy, C.P. & Waller, P.J.. 1985a. The preparation of thin sections of sous and unconsolidated sediments. Harpenden: Soil Survey.Google Scholar
Bullock, P., Fedoroff, N. Jongkrius, A. Stoops, G. & Tursina, T.. 1985b. Handbook for soil thin section description. Wolverhampton: Waine Research.Google Scholar
Crowther, D., French, C. & Pryor, F.. 1985. Approaching the Fens the flexible way, in Haselgrove, C. Millet, M. & Smith, I. (ed.), Archaeology from the ploughsoil: 59–76. Sheffield: Department of Archaeology and Prehistory.Google Scholar
French, C.A.I. 1985. Soil, sediment and molluscan analyses of excavated features, in Pryor, & French, (1985): 205–14.Google Scholar
French, C.A.I. In press. Further aspects of the buried prehistoric soils in the Fen margin northeast of Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, in Murphy, P. & French, C.A.I. (ed.), The exploitation of wetlands. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
French, C.A.I. & Pryor, F.M.M.. In preparation. The southwest Fen dyke survey 1982–1986, East Anglian Archaeology.Google Scholar
Gurney, D.A. 1980. Evidence of Bronze Age salt production at Northey, Peterborough. Northamptonshire Archaeology 15: 1–11.Google Scholar
Jongerius, A. 1970. Some morphological aspects of regrouping phenomena in Dutch soils, Geoderma 4: 311–31.Google Scholar
Mckeague, J. A. 1983. Clay skins and argillic horizons, in Bullock, P. & Murphy, C.P. (ed.), Soil micromorphology: 367–88. Berkhamsted: A B Academic.Google Scholar
Macphail, R.I. 1985. In D. Rudling, Recent archaeological research at Selmeston, East Sussex, Sussex Archaeological Collections 123: 1–25.Google Scholar
Macphail, R.I. 1987. A review of soil science in archaeology in England, in Keeley, H.C.M. (ed.), Environmental archaeology A: regional review 2: 332–77. London: HBMC.Google Scholar
Pryor, F.M.M. 1985. Dyke survey: an imperfect approach to the invisible, Archaeological Review from Cambridge 4(1): 5–14.Google Scholar
Pryor, F.M.M. & French, C.A.I.. 1985. Archaeology and environment in the Lower Welland Valley, East Anglian Archaeology 27.Google Scholar
Pryor, F.M.M., French, C.A.I. & Taylor, M.. 1985. An interim report on excvations at Etton, Maxey, Cambridgeshire, 1982–84, Antiquaries Journal 65: 275–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, F.M.M., French, C.A.I. & Taylor, M.. 1986. Flag Fen, Fengate, Peterborough I: discovery, reconnaissance and initial excavation (1982–85), Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 52: 1–24.Google Scholar