Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:29:23.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The social aims of Chinese archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Richard J. Pearson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From its early stages, on 16 March 1967, the Department of State Affairs and the Central Army decreed the protection of cultural objects and books, and during the summer, 1971, a large exhibition in Peking featured an immense range of archaeological materials, all uncovered in the past few years (Kung, 1972). Archaeology may be studied as one of the best-documented humanities in contemporary China.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 51 , Issue 201 , March 1977 , pp. 8 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1977 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

‘Carry out the great policy of “making the past serve the present” resolutely; endeavour to manage archaeological publication well.’* After a six-year lapse, archaeological publications from China resumed in the spring of 1972. In addition to the monthly journals, K’ao Ku and Wen Wu, a number of monographs and short publications both in Chinese and in English have appeared. All bear abundant testimony that, contrary to initial apprehensions, cultural properties were not destroyed or discarded during the Cultural Revolution. Professor Pearson, Department of Anthropology and Sociology, The University of British Columbia, wrote this article for us in I973 and we are grateful to him for his patience.

References

Bulling, A. G. 1972. China; archaeological investigations 1966–71, Expedition XIV, No. 1, 22–39.Google Scholar
Davis, H. A. 1972. The crisis in American archaeology, Science CLXXV, 267–72.Google Scholar
foreign languages publishing house. 1972. Archaeological finds in New China (Peking).Google Scholar
Kung, A-WEN. 1972. Looking at objects unearthed during the cultural revolution, Wen Wu, No. 6, 61–3.Google Scholar
Kuo, MO-JO 1972. The dialectical process in ancient writing. K’ao Ku No. 3, 2 3.Google Scholar
Mcgimsey, C. R. 1971. Archaeology and the law, American Antiquity, XLVII, 141–3.Google Scholar
Pearson, R. J. 1973a. Radiocarbon dates from China, Antiquity, XLVII, 141–3.Google Scholar
Pearson, R. J. 1973b. East Asia (Current research), American Antiquity, XXXVM, No. 3, 361–3.Google Scholar
Triestman, j. 1972. The new archaeology of China. Natural History, LXXVI, No. 7, 30–40.Google Scholar
Watson, B. 1969. Records of the historian : chapters from the Shih Chi, Vol. 1 (New York).Google Scholar