Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:45:13.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Significant details: systems, certainties and the art-historian as detective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

John Elsner*
Affiliation:
King's College, Cambridge CB2 1ST

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review-articles
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berard, C, Bron, C.. Durand, J-L., Frontisi-Ducroux, F., Lissaraque, F., Schnapp, A. & Venant., J-P. 1989. A city of images. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boardman, J. 1987. Silver is white, Revue Archéologique: 27995.Google Scholar
Conan Doyle, A. 1894. The memoirs of Sherlock Holmes. London: Gordon Newnes.Google Scholar
Dover, K.J. 1978. Greek homosexuality. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Eco, U. 1983. The Name of the Rose. London: Seeker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Frel, J. 1983. Euphronios and his fellows, in Moon, W.G. (ed.). Ancient Greek art and iconography: 14758. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Frel, J. 1984. A view into Phintias’ private life, in Houghton, A. (ed.), Studies in honor of L. Mildenberg: 5760. Wetteren: Editions NR.Google Scholar
Gill, D.W.J. & Vickers., M. 1989. Pots and kettles, Revue Archéologique: 297303.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C. 1983. Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes: clues and the scientific method, in Eco, U. and Sebeok, T. (ed.), The sign of three: 81118. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press>Google Scholar
Acknowledgements. My thanks are due to D.W.J. Gill and A.M. Snodgrass.Google Scholar
Hoffman, H. 1988. Why did the Greeks need imagery? Hephaistos 9: 14362.Google Scholar
Kurtz, D.C. 1985. Beazley and the connoisseurship of Greek Vases, in Greek Vases in the J. Paul Getty Museum: 23750. Malibu (CA): J. Paul Getty Museum. Occasional Papers on Antiquities 3.Google Scholar
Reilly, J. 1989. Many brides: mistress or maid on Athenian Lekythoi, Hesperia 58: 41144.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. 1985. Beazley and Attic vase painting, in Kurtz, D.C. (ed.), Beazley and Oxford: 1930. Oxford: Oxford Committee for Archaeology.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. 1985. Artful crafts, Journal of Hellenic Studies 105: 10828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Bothmer, D. 1987. Greek vase painting: 200 years of connoisseurship, in Papers on the Amasis Painter and his world: 184–204. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Williams, D. 1983. Women on Athenian vases: problems of interpretation, in Cameron, A. & Kuhrt, A. (ed.), Images of women in antiquity: 92106. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Wind, E. 1963. Art and anarchy. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. 1973. Giovanni Morelli and the origins of scientific connoisseurship, in Wollheim, R., On art and mind: 177201. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar