Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T11:14:04.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rose Theatre, London: the state of knowledge and what we still need to know

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

Jon Greenfield  and
Andrew Gurr
Jon Greenfield
Affiliation:
Parameta Architects, 70 Cowcross Street, London EC1M 6EJ, UK, Director, Rose Theatre Trust (Email: [email protected])
Andrew Gurr
Affiliation:
Department of English, The University of Reading, P. O. Box 218, Reading RG6 2AA, UK,), Director, Rose Theatre Trust (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Rose theatre – the place in Elizabethan London where one could see Shakespeare and Marlowe performed – may have started life as a bear-baiting arena. This is one of the deductions drawn from this new study of the archive from the excavations of 1989. The authors also present a new model for the theatre’s evolution, offer a fresh reconstruction of the building in its heyday and put in a powerful plea for more archaeological investigation on the ground.

Keywords

LondonSouthwarkpost-medievalsixteenth centurytheatrebearsdogsShakespeare
Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 78 , Issue 300 , June 2004 , pp. 330 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowsher, Julian. 1998. The Rose Theatre. An archaeological discovery. Museum of London, London, 1998.Google Scholar
Bowsher, Julian & Blatherwick, Simon. 1990. “The Structure of the Rose”, in New Issues in the Reconstruction of Shakespeare’s Theatre, ed. F. J. Hildy, Peter Lang, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Ceresano, Susan P. 1989. Raising a playhouse from the dust. Shakespeare Quarterly 40: 483–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, Christine. 1990, The Rose Theatre, Nick Hern Books, London.Google Scholar
Foakes, R.A.. 1991. The Discovery of the Rose theatre: some implications. Shakespeare Survey 43: 141–8.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew. 1992. Cultural Property and ‘sufficient interest’: the Rose and the Globe sites. International Journal of Cultural Property I: 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orrell, John & Gurr, Andrew. 1989a. What the Rose can tell us. Times Literary Supplement, 9–15 June 1989: 636, 649;Google Scholar
Orrell, John & Gurr, Andrew. 1989b What the Rose can tell us. Antiquity 63: 421–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Jean. 1995. The Archaeology of Shakespeare. Alan Sutton, Stroud.Google Scholar