Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:57:05.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking the quest for provenance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

P. Budd ,
R. Haggerty ,
A. M. Pollard ,
B. Scaife  and
R. G. Thomas
P. Budd
Affiliation:
Ancient Metallurgy Research Group, Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, England
R. Haggerty
Affiliation:
Ancient Metallurgy Research Group, Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, England
A. M. Pollard
Affiliation:
Ancient Metallurgy Research Group, Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, England
B. Scaife
Affiliation:
Ancient Metallurgy Research Group, Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, England
R. G. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Western Sydney, Nepean, PO Box 10, Kingswood NSW 2747, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the larger — and more expensive — present programmes of study in archaeological science explores the provenance of prehistoric bronzes from the Mediterranean. What are the bases of research? What will the findings tell us about the real place of metal as it moved in the ancient world?

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 267 , March 1996 , pp. 168 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Begemann, F., Pernicka, E. & Schmitt-Strecker, S.. 1995. Thermi on Lesbos: a caso study of changing tracie patterns, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 14(2): 123-36.Google Scholar
Budd, P., Gale, D., Pollard, A.M., Thomas, R.G. & Williams, P.A.. 1993a. Evaluating lead isotope data: further observations, Archaeometry 35(2): 241-7.Google Scholar
Budd, P., Gale, D., Pollard, A.M., Thomas, R.G. & Williams, P.A.. 1993b. Evaluating lead isotope data: further observations — reply. Archaeometry 35(2): 262-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, P., Pollard, A.M., Scaife, B. & Thomas, R.G.. 1995a. Oxhide ingots, recycling and the Mediterranean metals trade, Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 8(1): 1–32.Google Scholar
Budd, P., Pollard, A.M., Scaife, B. & Thomas, R.G.. 1995b. Lead isotopes and oxhide ingots: a final comment. journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 8(1): 70–75.Google Scholar
Budd, P., Hacgerty, R., Pollard, A.M., Scaifb, B. & Thomas, R.G.. 1995c. New heavy isotope studies in archaeology, Israel Journal of Chemistry 35(2): 125-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, P., Scaife, B., Taylor, T. & Thomas, R.G.. In press. Untangling the web: some new views on the origins of prehistoric metallurgy, Historical Metallurgy. Google Scholar
Budd, P. & Taylor, T., 1995. The faerie smith versus the bronze industry: magic versus science in the interpretation of prehistoric metal-making, World Archaeology 27(1): 133-43.Google Scholar
Butler, J.J. & Vander Waals, J.D.. 1964. Metals Analysis. SAM 1 and European prehistory, Helinium 4: 3–39.Google Scholar
Galey, E.R. 1951. Early history and literature of archaeological chemistry, Journal of Chemical Education 28: 64-6.Google Scholar
Galey, E.R. 1967. The early history of chemistry in the service of archaeology. Journal of Chemical Education 44(3): 120-23.Google Scholar
Ghernykh, E.N. 1994. Ancient metallurgy in the USSR. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cherry, J.F. & Knapp, A.B.. 1991. Quantitative provenance studies and Bronze Age trade in the Mediterranean: some preliminary reflections, in Gale (ed.): 90–119.Google Scholar
Ghpplndale, G. 1994. Editorial, Antiquity 68: 1–9.Google Scholar
Goles, J.M. 1982. The Bronze Age in Northwestern Europe: problems and advances, in Wendorf, F. & Close, A.E.; (ed.), Advances in World Archaeology: 1, 265–321. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gale, N.H. 1991a. Gopper oxhide ingots: their origin and their place in the Bronze Age metals trade in the Mediterranean, in Gale, (ed.): 197–239.Google Scholar
Gale, N.H. (ed.). 1991b. Bronze Age trade in the Mediterranean: 90–119. Jönsered: Paul Aströms Förlag. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology 90.Google Scholar
Gale, N.H. & Stos-Gale, Z.A.. 1982. Bronze Age copper sources in the Mediterranean: a now approach, Science 216(4541): 11–19.Google Scholar
Gale, N.H. & Stos-Gale, Z.A.. 1992. Evaluating lead isotope data [comments on Sayro et al. 1992a]. Archaeometry 34(2): 311-17.Google Scholar
Gale, N.H. & Stos-Gale, Z.A.. 1993. Comments [on Budd et al. 1993a], Archaeometry 35(2): 252-9.Google Scholar
Gale, N.H. & Stos-Gale, Z.A.. 1995. Comments [on Budd et al. 1995a], journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 8(1): 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. 1995. Comments [Budd et al. 1995a], journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 8(1): 42-4.Google Scholar
Junghans, S., Sangmeister, E. & Schröder, M.. 1960. Metallanalysen kupferzeitlicher und frübronzezeitlicher Boden-fundc aus Europa. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Junghans, S., Sangmeister, E. & Schröder, M.. 1968. Kupfer und Bronze in der frühen Metallzeit Europas. Katalog der Analysen Nr. 985–10040. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Junghans, S., Sangmeister, E. & Schröder, M.. 1974. Kupfer und Bronze in der frühen Metalizeit Europas. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Knapp, A.B. In press. Provenance studies and the Bronze Age Mediterranean: an archaeological perspective. Proceedings of a conference on science and archaeology: towards an interdisciplinary approach to studying the past. Harvard University. Cambridge (MA), October 1994.Google Scholar
Knapp, A.B., Muhly, J.D. & Muhly, P.M.. 1988. To hoard is human: the metal deposits of LC IIC-LG III, Report of the Department of Antiquities, Cyprus: 233-62.Google Scholar
Leese, M.N. 1992. Evaluating lead isotope data [comments on Sayre et al. 1992a], Archaeometry 34(2): 318-22.Google Scholar
Muhly, J.D. 1991. The development of copper metallurgy in Late Bronze Age Cyprus, in Gale (ed.): 180-96. Jönsered: Paid Åströms Förlag. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology 90.Google Scholar
Muhly, J.D. 1995. Lead isotope analysis and the archaeologist [comments Budd et al. 1995a], Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 8(1): 54-8.Google Scholar
Pernicka, E. 1992. Evaluating lead isotope data [comments on Sayre et al. 1992a]. Archaeometry 34(2): 322-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pernicka, E. 1993. Comments [Budd et al. 1993a], Archaeometry 35(2): 259-62.Google Scholar
Pernicka, E. 1995. Crisis or catharsis in lead isotope analysis? [Comments on Budd et al. 1995a], Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 8(1): 59–64.Google Scholar
Pernicka, E., Seeliger, T.C., Wagner, G.A., Begemann, F., Schmitt-Strecker, S., Eibner, G., Öztunali, Ö. & Baranti, I.. 1984. Archäometallurgische Untersuchungen in Nordwest-anatolien, Jarbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, Mainz 31: 533-99.Google Scholar
Pittloni, R. 1957. Urzeitlieher Borgbau auf Kupfererz und Spurenanalyse, Archaeologia Austriuca. Beiheft 1.Google Scholar
Reedy, T.J. & Reedy, C.L.. 1992. Evaluating lead isotope data [comments on Sayre et al. 1992a]. Archaeometry 34(2): 327-9.Google Scholar
Sayre, E.V., Yener, K.A., Joel, E.G. & Barnes, I.L.. 1992a. Statistical evaluation of the presently accumulated lead isotope data from Anatolia and surrounding regions, Archaeometry 34(1): 73–106.Google Scholar
Sayre, E.V., Yener, K.A., Joel, E.G. & Barnes, I.L.. 1992b. Evaluating lead isotope data [comments on Sayre et al. 1992a], Archaeometry 34(2): 330-36.Google Scholar
Sayre, E.V., Yener, K.A., Joel, E.G. & Barnes, I.L.. 1993. Comments [on Budd et al. 1993a], Archaeometry 35(2): 247-52.Google Scholar
Sayre, E.V., Yener, K.A., Joel, E.G. & Barnes, I.L.. 1995. Comments [on Budd et al. 1995a], Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 8(1): 45–53.Google Scholar
Scaife, B., Budd, P., Mcdonnell, J.G., Pollard, A.M. & Thomas, R.G.. In press. A reappraisal of statistical techniques used in lead isotope analysis, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Archaeometry. Ankara, May 1994.Google Scholar
Shkrratt, A. 1994. Core, periphery and margin: perspectives on the Bronze Age. in Mathers, C. & Stoddart, S. (ed.), Development and decline in the Mediterranean Bronze Age: 335-45. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press. Sheffield Archaeological Monographs 8.Google Scholar
Stos-Gale, Z., Gale, N.H., Houghton, J. & Speakman, R.. 1995. Load isotope data from the Isotrace Laboratory. Oxford: Archaeometry data base 1. ores from the Western Mediterranean, Archaeometry 37(2): 407-15.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. 1992. The Gundestrup Cauldron, Scientific American 266(3): 84-9.Google Scholar
Thompson, F.C. 1958. The early metallurgy of copper and bronze, Man 58: 1–6.Google Scholar