Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T23:46:01.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quanterness, radiocarbon and the Orkney cairns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2016

Extract

The chambered cairns of Orkney are among the most sophisticated architectural products of prehistoric Europe. Maes Howe, since the chamber was re-entered a century ago (Petrie, 1861) has excited the admiration of all who have visited it. In Stuart Piggott’s words (1954, 244): ‘The assured competence and mastery over the building material shown at Maes Howe mark it out as a monument comparable in prehistoric Britain only to Stonehenge in its individual handling of an architectural problem. In both a contemporary existing conception—that of a chambered tomb or that of a stone circle—has been used to produce a superlative monument that by its originality of execution is lifted out of its class into a unique position.’

Quanterness has proved to be one of the best preserved of the Orcadian monuments, with four of the six side chambers still standing, very much as they were built some five thousand years ago. Much of the importance of the excavation comes from the detailed examination of the deposits within the chamber which have offered an unusual insight into neolithic burial practice, and these are fully discussed in the forthcoming final publication (Renfrew et al., in press).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, G. 1805. History of the Orkney Islands (Edinburgh).Google Scholar
Callander, J.G. and Grant, W. 1935. A long stalled cairn, the Knowe of Yarso, in Rousay, Orkney, PSAS, 69, 325–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1952. Re-examination of the chambered cairn of Quoyness, Sanday, 1951–2, PSAS, 86, 121–87.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1956. Maes Howe, PSAS, 88, 155207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G. and Grant, W.G. 1939. A Stone Age settlement at the Braes of Rinyo, Rousay, Orkney, PSAS, 72, 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G. and Grant, W.G. 1947, A Stone Age settlement at the Braes of Rinyo, Rousay, Orkney, Second report, PSAS, 81, 1642.Google Scholar
Clark, R.M. 1975. A calibration curve for radiocarbon dates, Antiquity, 49, 251–66Google Scholar
Dickins, B. 1930. The runic inscriptions of Maes Howe, Proc. Orkney. Ant. Soc., 8, 2730.Google Scholar
Farrer, J. 1868. Note of excavations in Sanday, PSAS, 7, 398401.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J.R.C. 1956. Excavations at Jarlshof, Shetland, Ministry of Works Archaeological Reports No. 1 (Edinburgh).Google Scholar
Hamilton, J.R.C. Excavations af Clickhimin, Shetland. Ministry of Public Buildings and Works Archaeological Reports No. 6 (Edinburgh).Google Scholar
Henshall, A.S. 1963. The Chambered Tombs of Scotland, vol. 1. (Edinburgh).Google Scholar
Petrie, G. 1861. Notice on the opening of a tumulus in the parish of Stenness on the Mainland of Orkney, Ant. J., 18, 353–8.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1954. Neolithic cultures of the British Isles (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1976, Megaliths, territories and populations, in (ed.), De Laet, S.J., Acculturation and continuity in Atlantic Europe (Dissertationes Archaeologicae Gandensis XVI) (Bruges), 198220.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., Chesterman, J.T., Clutton-Brock, J., Davidson, D.A., Daykin, A., Henshall, A.S., and Jones, R.L. (in press), Investigations in Orkney (Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London).Google Scholar
Smith, I.F. 1974. The Neolithic, in (ed.), Renfrew, C., British prehistory, a new outline (London), 128–36.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G., and Longworth, I.H. 1971. Durrington Walls : Excawations 1966–68. (Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London, 29).Google Scholar