Article contents
A Palaeolithic ‘Pompeii’ at Kostenki, Russia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2015
Abstract
A new Upper Palaeolithic occupation layer has been discovered in 2000 at the site of Markina Gora (Kostenki 14) on the River Don (the Voronezh Oblast), in Russia. The layer was sealed by volcanic ash, suggesting that a natural catastrophe had put an end to a human settlement there, just as Pompeii, Herculaneum and Stabiae were destroyed and buried following the powerful eruption of Mt. Vesuvius in AD 79. The Palaeolithic site is notable for its assemblage of ornaments
- Type
- Research
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2003
References
Ciotti, L.
2000. Lamelles Dufour et grattoirs aurignaciens (carénés et à museau) de la couche 8 de l’abri Pataud, Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne. L’Anthropologie, 104.2:239–263.Google Scholar
Demidenko Yu., E.
2000–2001. The European Early Aurignacian of Krems-Dufour type industries: a view from Eastern Europe. Préhistoire Européenne
16–17: 147–162.Google Scholar
Demidenko, Yu.E., Chabai, V. P., Otte, M., Yevtushenko, A. I., Tatartsev, S. V.. 1998. Siuren-I, an Aurignacian site in the Crimea (the investigations of the 1994–1996 field seasons)in Otte, M. (ed) Préhistoire d’Anatolie. Genèse de deux mondes. (Actes du colloque international. Liège, 1997, ERAUL), 85/1: 367–413.Google Scholar
Demidenko, Yu.E., Otte, M.. 2000–2001. Suren-I (Crimea) in the context of a European Aurignacian. Préhistoire Européenne
16–17: 133–146.Google Scholar
Lucas, G.
1997. Les lamelles Dufour du Flageolet I (Bézenac, Dordogne) dans le contexte aurignacien. Paléo
9: 191–219.Google Scholar
Lucas, G.
1999. Production expérimentale de lamelles torses: approche préliminaire. Bulletin SPF, 96/2: 145–151.Google Scholar
Melekestsev, I. V., Yu Kirianov, V, Praslov, N. D.. 1984.Catastrophic eruption in the Campi Flegrei area (Italy)—possible source of volcanic ashes in the Upper Pleistocene sediments of the European part of the USSR. Volcanology and seismology, 3: 35–44 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Otte, M., Noiret, P., Tatartsev, S., Lopez Bayon, I.. 1996. L’Aurignacien de Suren I (Crimée): fouilles 1994 et 1995.in A. Palma di Cesnola, Montet-White, A., Valoch, K. (eds) The Late Aurignacian. (Colloquium XI of Section 6: The Upper Palaeolithic) XIII Congrès Internationald’U.I.S.P.P.—Italia,1996. (Forlí): 123–137.Google Scholar
Pettitt, P. B.
1998. Middle and Upper Palaeoithic Crimea: the radiocarbon chronology. Préhistoire d’Anatolie. Genèse de deux mondes. Actes du colloque international. Liège, 1997 (ed. M.Otte). Eraul, 85/1: 329–338.Google Scholar
Sinitsyn, A. A.
1993. Les niveaux aurignaciens de Kostienki 1. Actes du XII Congrès de l’UISPP Bratislava, 1991. (Bratislava): 242–259.Google Scholar
Sinitsyn, A. A.
1996. Kostenki 14 (Markina gora): data, problems, and perspectives. Préhistoire Européenne
9. (Liège): 273–313.Google Scholar
Sinitsyn, A. A.
1999. Chronological problems of the Palaeolithic of Kostenki-Borschevo area: geological, palynological and 14C perspectives.in Evin, J., Oberlin, Ch., Daugas, J.-P., Salles, J.-F. (eds)
l4C et Archéologie. 3èmeCongrès International (Lyon, 1998) Mémoires SPF, t.XXVI et Supplément 1999 de la Revue dArchéometrie. (Lyon): 143–150.Google Scholar
Sinitsyn, A. A., Praslov, Yu, N. D.
Vezhentsev, S., Sulezhitskiy, L. D.. 1997. Radiocarbon chronology of the upper Palaeolithic of Eastern Europe.in Sinitsyn, A. A., Praslov, N. D. (eds) Radiocarbon chronology of the Palaeolithic of Eastern Europe and Northern Asia. Problems and perspectives (Saint Petersburg): 21–66 (in Russian).Google Scholar
White, R.
1989. Production Complexity and Standardisation in Early Aurignacian Bead and Pendant Manufacture: Evolutionary Implications in Mellars, P., Stringer, C. (eds) The Human Revolution. Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans (Edinburgh): 366–390.Google Scholar
- 51
- Cited by