Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:54:55.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Origins of American Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

R. S. MacNeish
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When prehistoric cultural developments in the Old and New World are compared, one difference is outstanding. The American Indian domesticated an inordinately large number of plants. This is even more remarkable when one considers that the prehistoric population of the Americas was very much less than that of the Old World and, also, that the development of American civilization began very much later.

During the last 25 years, archaeological investigations in the New World have revealed considerable information about prehistoric plant domestication and agriculture. Although this data is far from complete, it is now possible to establish some hypotheses, not only about the origin and spread of several American domesticates, but also about the effect of plant domestication, and later agriculture, upon cultural development and process in the New World.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 39 , Issue 154 , June 1965 , pp. 87 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

[1] Towle, Margaret A., ‘The Ethnobotany of Pre- Columbian Peru’, Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, 30, 1961.Google Scholar

[2] Engel, Frederic, ‘A Preceramic Settlement on the Central Coast of Peru: Asia, Unit 1’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 53, pt. III, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[3] MacNeish, R. S., Second Annual Report of the Tehuacan Archaeological-Botanical Project, R. S. Peabody Foundation for Archaeology, Andover, 1962.Google Scholar

[4] MacNeish, R. S., ‘Preliminary Archaeological Investigations in the Sierra de Tamaulipas’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 48, pt. VI, Philadelphia, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[5] Whitaker, T. W., Cutler, H. C. and MacNeish, R. S., ‘Cucurbit materials from three caves near Ocampo, Tamaulipas’, American Antiquity, 2, no. iv, Salt Lake City, 1957.Google Scholar

[6] Kaplan, L. and MacNeish, R. S., ‘Prehistoric Bean Remains from Caves in the Ocampo Region of Tamaulipas, Mexico’, Botanical Museum Leaflets, 19, no. II, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.Google Scholar

[7] Mangelsdorf, P. C., MacNeish, R. S. and Galinat, W. C., ‘Archaeological evidence of the diffusion and evolution of maize in northeastern Mexico’, Botanical Museum Leaflets, 17, Cambridge, Mass., 1956.Google Scholar

[8] Agogino, George A., ‘The San José Sites: A Cochise-like Manifestation in the Middle Rio Grande’, Southwestern Lore, 26, no. 11, Santa Fé, New Mexico, 1960.Google Scholar

[9] Mangelsdorf, P. C. and Earle Smith, C., ‘New Archaeological Evidence on Evolution in Maize’, Botanical Museum Leaflets, 13, no. VIII, Cambridge, Mass., 1959.Google Scholar

[10] Martin, P., ‘Mogollon cultural continuity and change’, Fieldiana: Anthropology, 40, Chicago, 1952.Google Scholar

[11] Carter, George F., ‘Plant geography and culture history in the American Southwest’, Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, no. 5, Chicago, 1945.Google Scholar