Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:30:43.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New views on old hands: the context of stencils in El Castillo and La Garma caves (Cantabria, Spain)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Paul Pettitt
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK (Author for correspondence, email: [email protected])
Alfredo Maximiano Castillejo
Affiliation:
The Cantabria International Institute for Prehistoric Research, University of Cantabria, Edificio Interfacultativo, Avda. los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain
Pablo Arias
Affiliation:
The Cantabria International Institute for Prehistoric Research, University of Cantabria, Edificio Interfacultativo, Avda. los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain
Roberto Ontañón Peredo
Affiliation:
The Cantabria International Institute for Prehistoric Research, University of Cantabria, Edificio Interfacultativo, Avda. los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain Museo de Prehistoria y Arqueología de Cantabria, Avda. los Castros 65–67, 39005 Santander, Spain Cuevas Prehistóricas de Cantabria, 39670 Puenta Viesgo, Spain
Rebecca Harrison
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, Northgate House, West Street, Sheffield S1 4ET, UK

Abstract

Hand stencils are an intriguing feature of prehistoric imagery in caves and rockshelters in several parts of the world, and the recent demonstration that the oldest of those in Western Europe date back to 37 000 years or earlier further enhances their significance. Their positioning within the painted caves of France and Spain is far from random, but responds to the shapes and fissures in the cave walls. Made under conditions of low and flickering light, the authors suggest that touch—‘palpation’—as much as vision, would have driven and directed the locations chosen for these stencils. Detailed study of the images in two Cantabrian caves also allows different individuals to be distinguished, most of whom appear to have been female. Finally, the project reveals deliberate associations between the stencils and features on the cave walls.

Type
Research articles
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcalde Del Rio, H., Breuil, H. & Sierra, L.. 1911. Lescavernesdelarégion Cantabrique (Espagne). Monaco: Imprimerie A. Chene.Google Scholar
Arias, P., Laval, E., Menu, M., Gonzalez Sainz, C. & Peredc, R. Cntancn. 2011. Les colourants dans l'art parietal et mobilier paléolithique de La Garma (Cantabrie, Espagne). L’Anthropologie 115:425–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baffier, D. & Girard, M.. 2007. La Grand Grotte D'Arcy-sur-Cure. Les Dossiers D'Archéologie 324:7485.Google Scholar
Barriere, C. & Sueres, M.. 1993. Les mains de Gargas. Dossiers D'Archeologie 178:4654.Google Scholar
Bourges, F. 2007. Les peintures préhistoriques des Grottes, les raisons D'une conservation exceptionelle, in Foucher, P., San Juan-Foucher, C. & Rumeau, Y. (ed.) La Grotte de Gargas. Un siècle de découvertes: 5357. Mazères de Neste: Communauteé de Communesdu Cantonde Saint-Laurant de Neste.Google Scholar
Breuil, H. 1952. Four hundred centuries of cave art. Paris: Sappho.Google Scholar
Capitan, L. 1911. Les empreintes de mains sur les parois de las Grotte de Gargas. Bulletin Anthropologique 1911:8788.Google Scholar
Cartailhac, E. 1906-1909. Les mains rouges et noire et les dessins paleéolithiques de la Grotte de Gargas. Bulletin de la SociétéD'Archéologie du Midi de la France 37:140–41.Google Scholar
Clottes, J. & Ccurtin, J.. 1996. The cave beneath the sea. Palaeolithic images at Cosquer. New York: Harry N. Abrams.Google Scholar
Clottes, J., Ccurtin, J., Valladas, H., Cachier, H., Mercier, N. & Arncld, M.. 1992. La Grotte Cosquer datee. Bulletin de la Société Prehistorique Française 89:230–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espejo Herreras, M. & Duarte, P. Cantalejo. 2006. Cueva de Ardales (Malaga). Reproducción digital del arte rupestrepaéolítico. Guadalteba: Comarca del Guadalteba.Google Scholar
Faurie, C. & Raymond, M.. 2004. Handedness frequency over more than ten thousand years. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 271: S43S45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fcucher, P. & Rumeau, Y.. 2007. Les galleries ornées de Gargas, in P. Foucher, San Juan-Foucher, C. & Rumeau, Y. (ed.) La Grotte de Gargas. Un siècle de deécouvertes: 6186. Mazeères de Neste: Communauteé de Communesdu Cantonde Saint-Laurant de Neste.Google Scholar
Fcucher, P., San Juan-Fcucher, C. & Rumeau, Y. (ed.). 2007. La Grotte de Gargas. Un sieècle de déecouvertes. Mazeères de Neste: Communautéede Communes du Canton de Saint-Laurant de Neste.Google Scholar
Gonzalez Garcia, R. 1987. Organization, distribution and typology of the cave art of Monte del Castillo, Spain. Rock Art Research 4:127–36.Google Scholar
Gonzalez Sainz, C. 2003. El conjuncto parietal paléolitico de la galería inferior de La Garma (Cantabria): avance de su organización interna, in de Balbin Behrmann, R. & Ramírez, P. Bueno (ed.) El arteprehistorico desde los inicios del siglo XXXI: Primer Symposium Internacional de Arte Prehistorico di Ribadasella: 201–22. Ribadasella: Associacion Cultural Amigos de Ribadasella.Google Scholar
Groenen, M. 1997. Ombres et lumières dans l'art des grottes. Bruxelles: ULB.Google Scholar
Guthrie, R. D. 2005. The nature of Paleolithic art. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, A. 1980. Further information on the prehistoric representations of human hands in the cave of Gargas. Medical History 24:214–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssens, P. A. 1957. Medical views on prehistoric representations of human hands. Medical History 1:318–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lejeune, M. 2004. Quelques reflexions sur le role de la paroi rocheuse dans l’art du Paléolithique Supérieur, in Lejeune, M. (ed.) L’Art parietal paléolithique dans son contexte naturel (ERAUL 107): 1519. Liège: Université de Liège.Google Scholar
Lerci-Gcurhan, A. 1967. Les mains de Gargas. Essaie pour une etude D'ensemble. Bulletin de la Socieéteé Preéhistorique Françcaise 64:107–22.Google Scholar
Lerci-Gcurhan, A. 1968. The art of prehistoric man in Western Europe. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, J. D. 2002. The mind in the cave: consciousness and the origins of art. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Lcrblanchet, M. 1995. Les grottes ornées de la préhistoire: nouveaux regards. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Lcrblanchet, M. 2009. Claw marks and ritual traces in the Paleolithic sanctuaries of the Quercy, in Bahn, P. G. (ed.) An enquiringmind: studies in honour of Alexander Marshack: 165–70. cxford: cxbow.Google Scholar
Lcrblanchet, M. 2010. Art pariétal. Grottes ornees du Quercy. Parc-Saint-Joseph: Rouergue.Google Scholar
Manning, J., Scutt, D., Wilson, J. & Lewis-Jones, D. I.. 1998. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction 13:30003004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ontancn, R. 2003. Sols et structures D'habitat du Paléolithique supérieur, nouvelles donnés depuis les Cantabres: la Gallerie Inferieure de La Garma (Cantabrie, Espagne). L'Anthropologie 107:333–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigeaud, R. 2004. Dialogue avec la paroi: cas des representations paleéolithiques de la Grotte orneée Mayenne-Sciences (Thorigné-en-Charnie, Mayenne), in Lejeune, M. (ed.) L’Art pariétal paléolithique dans son contexte naturel (ERAUL 107): 2143. Liège: Université de Liège.Google Scholar
Pike, A.WG., Hcffmann, D. L., Garcia-Diez, M., Pettitt, P. B., Alcolea, J., De Balbin, R., Gonzalez, C. Sainz C., De Las Heras, Lasheras, J. A., Montes, R. & Zilhao, J.. 2012. U-Series dating of Paleolithic art in 11 caves in Spain. Science 336:1409–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Remacle, L. 2004. De la grotte au(x) mythe(s). Phénomenes D'interaction et lecture de l’image paleolithique, in Otte, M., Oosterbeek, L., Seglie, D., Remacle, L. & Bertollo, V (ed.) Art du Paleolithique Supérieur et du Mesolithique (British Archaeological Reports international series 1311): 714. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Ripcll Lcpez, S., Ripcll Perellc, E. & Giraldo, H. Cclladc. 1999a. Maltravieso. El santuario extremeño de las manos. Caceres: Museo de Caceres.Google Scholar
Ripcll Lcpez, S., Ripcll Perellc, E., Collado Giraldc, H., Mas Cornella, M. & Pardo, J. F. Jorda. 1999b. Maltravieso. El santuario extremeño de las manos. Trabajos de Prehistoria 56:5984.Google Scholar
Rcuillcn, A. 2006. Au Gravettien, dans la Grotte Cosquer (Marseille, Bouches-du-Rhone), l'homme a-t-il compté sur ses doigts? L'Anthropologie 110:500509.Google Scholar
Sahly, A. 1966. Les mains mutilées dans l'art prehistorique. Toulouse: Privat.Google Scholar
Sharpe, K. & Van Gelder, L.. 2006. The study of finger flutings. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16:281–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. R. 2006. Sexual dimorphism in Upper Palaeolithic hand stencils. Antiquity 80:390404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vialou, D. 2004. Architecture de l'art parietal paleolithique, in Lejeune, M. (ed.) LArtpariétal paléolithique dans son contexte naturel (ERAUL 107): 714. Lieège: universiteé de Lièege.Google Scholar
Wildgoose, M., Hadingham, E. & Hooper, A.. 1982. The prehistoric hand pictures at Gargas: attempts at simulation. Medical History 26:205207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed