Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:39:07.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New evidence for the date of the Nazca lines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Helaine Silverman  and
David Browne
Helaine Silverman
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Urbana IL 61801, USA
David Browne
Affiliation:
Royal Commission on Ancient and Historical Monuments in Wales, Crown Building, Plas Crug. Aberystwyth SY23 2HP
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Surface features that possess no useful stratigraphy and are not, by their own nature, informative about their age, are notoriously hard to date. A study of associations now defines with good confidence the dates of the surface arrangements of stones and of cleared areas that make up some of the celebrated Nazca lines, Peru.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 65 , Issue 247 , June 1991 , pp. 208 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aveni, A. 1986. The Nazca lines: patterns in the desert, Archaeology 39(4): 32–9.Google Scholar
Aveni, A. 1990a. (ed.). The fines of Nazca. Philadelphia (PA): American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Aveni, A. 1990b. Order in the Nazca lines?, in Aveni 1990a: 41–113.Google Scholar
Browne, D.M. In press. Further archaeological reconnaissance in the Province of Palpa, Department of lea, Peru, in Saunders, N.J. (ed.), Contributions to New World archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Browne, D.M. & Baraybar, J.P. 1988. An archaeological reconnaissance in the Province of Palpa, Department of lea, Peru, in Saunders, N.J. & De Montmollin, O. (ed.), Recent studies in Pre-Columbian archaeology: 299–325. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series S421.Google Scholar
Clarkson, P.B. 1990. The archaeology of the Nazca pampa, Peru: environmental & cultural parameters, in Aveni 1990a: 117–72.Google Scholar
Hadingham, E. 1987. Lines to the mountain gods : Nazca and the mysteries o/Peru. New York (NY): Random House.Google Scholar
Hawkins, G. 1969. Beyond Stonehenge. New York (NY): Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hawkins, G. 1974. Prehistoric desert markings in Peru, National Geographic Society Research Reports, 1967 Projects: 117–44.Google Scholar
Isbell, W.H. 1978. The prehistoric ground drawings of Peru, Scientific American 239(4): 140–53.Google Scholar
Kosok, P. 1965. Life, land and water in ancient Peru. New York (NY): Long Island University Press.Google Scholar
Kosok, P. & Reiche, M. 1949. Ancient drawings on the desert of Peru, Archaeology 2: 206–15.Google Scholar
Massey, S. 1986. Sociopolitical change in the upper lea valley: BC 400 to 400 AD. Regional states on the south coast of Peru. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mejía Xesspe, T. 1940. Acueductos y caminos antiguos de la hoya del Río Grande de Nazca. Actas y Trabajos Científicos del XXV11 Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, Lima. 1939 (1): 559–69.Google Scholar
Menzel, D. 1959. The Inca occupation of the south coast of Peru, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 15(2): 125–42.Google Scholar
Menzel, D., Rowe, J.H. & Dawson, L.E. 1964. The Paracas pottery of Ica: a study in style and time. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 50.Google Scholar
Morrison, T. 1977. Pathways to the gods: the mystery of the Andes lines. Lima: Andean Air Mail & Peruvian Times, Publishers.Google Scholar
Morrison, T. 1987. The mystery of the Nasca Jines. Woodbridge: Nonesuch Expeditions.Google Scholar
Proulx, D. 1983. The Nasca style, in Katz, L. (ed.), Art of the Andes: Precolumbian sculptured and painted ceramics from the Arthur M. Sackler Collections: 87–105. Washington: Arthur M. Sackler Foundation.Google Scholar
Reiche, M. 1968. Mystery on the desert. Stuttgart: Heinrich Fink.Google Scholar
Scheiber, K. & Lancho, J. 1988. Los pukios de Nasca: un sistema de galerías filtrantes, Boletín de Lima 59: 51–62.Google Scholar
Silverman, H. 1986. Cahuachi: an Andean ceremonial center. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Silverman, H. 1987. A Nasca 8 occupation at an Early Nasca site: the Room of the Posts at Cahuachi, Andean Past 1: 5–55.Google Scholar
>Silverman, H. 1988. Cahuachi: non-urban cultural complexity on the south coast of Peru, Journal of Field Archeology 15(4): 403–30.Google Scholar
>Silverman, H. 1989. Preliminary report to National Geographic Society for the project entitled ‘Settlement pattern and sociopolitical organisation in the Nasca heartland’. Ms.Google Scholar
>Silverman, H. 1990a. Second report to National Geographic Society for the project entitled ‘Settlement pattern and sociopolitical organisation in the Nasca heartland’. Ms.Google Scholar
>Silverman, H. 1990b. Beyond the pampa: the geoglyphs of the valleys of Nazca, National Geographic Research 6(4): 435–56.Google Scholar
Strong, W.D. 1957. Paracas, Nazca, and Tiahuana-coid cultural relationships in south coastal Peru, American Antiquity 22(4): part 2.Google Scholar