Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:46:25.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neanderthal behaviour and stone tool function at the Middle Palaeolithic site of La Quina, France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

Bruce L. Hardy
Bruce L. Hardy*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Kenyon College, Gambier, Ohio, USA (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Neanderthal diet is explored by examining stone tools found at the site of La Quina for residues and microwear. The Neanderthal people are found to be using their scrapers for working plants and woods as well as meat.

Keywords

Middle PalaeolithicNeanderthalFrancedietwood-working
Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 78 , Issue 301 , September 2004 , pp. 547 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ager, T. & Ager, L.. 1980. Ethnobotany of the Eskimos of Nelson Island, Alaska. Arctic Anthropology 17: 27–48.Google Scholar
Albert, R., Lavi, O. Estroff, L. Weiner, S. Satskin, A. Ronen, A. & Lev-Yadun, C.. 1999. Mode of occupation of Tabun Cave, Mt. Carmel, Israel, during the Mousterian period: A study of the sediments and phytoliths. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:1249–1260.Google Scholar
Anderson, P.C. 1980. A Testimony of Prehistoric Tasks: Diagnostic Residues on Stone Tool Working Edges. – World Archaeology 12(2):181–94.Google Scholar
Anderson-Gerfaud, P. 1981. Contribution Méthodologique à l’Analyse des Microtraces d’Utilisation sur les Outils Préhistoriques. Thèse de Troisième Cycle. Bordeaux: Bordeaux University.Google Scholar
Anderson-Gerfaud, P. 1986. A few comments concerning residue analysis of stone plant-processing tools, in Owen, L. & Unrath, G. (ed.), Technical aspects of microwear studies on stone tools, part II, 69–81. Tubingen: Early Man News.Google Scholar
Anderson-Gerfaud, P. 1990. Aspects of behaviour in the Middle Paleolithic: Functional analysis of stone tools from south-west France, in Mellars, Paul (ed.), The Emergence of Modern Humans, 389–418. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Armand, D. 1998. Paléontologie animale. In Nouvelles fouilles à La Quina: Résultats preliminaries (A. Debenath & A.J. Jelinek, eds.), Gallia Préhistoire 40:56–60.Google Scholar
Armand, D. & Delagnes, A.. 1998. Les retouchoirs en os d’Artenac (couche 6c): perspectives archéozoologiques, taphonomiques, et experimentales. Economie Préhistorique: Les Comportments de Subsistance au Paléolithique, Rencontres Internationales d’Archéologie et d’Histoire d’Antibes.’ 18:205–214.Google Scholar
Bamforth, D. 1988. Investigation microwear polishes with blind tests: the Institute results in context. Journal of Archaeological Science 15: 11–23.Google Scholar
Bamforth, D., Burns, G. & Woodman, C.. 1990. Ambiguous use traces and blind test results: New data. Journal of Archaeological Science 17:413–30.Google Scholar
Bassinot, F.C., Labeyrie, L.D. Vincent, E. Quidelleur, X. Shackleton, N. & Lancelot, Y.. 1994. The astronomical theory of climate and the age of the Brunhes-Matuyama magnetic reversal. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 126:91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belitsky, S., Goren-Inbar, N. & Werker, E.. 1991. A Middle Pleistocene wooden plank with man-made polish. Journal of Human Evolution 20:349–353.Google Scholar
Benner, R., Fogel, M. & Sprague, E.. 1991. Diagenesis of below-ground biomass of Spartina alterniflora in salt-marsh sediments. Limnology and Oceanography 36:1358–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, T.D. & Trinkaus, E.. 1995. Patterns of trauma among Neanderthals. Journal of Archaeological Science 22:841–852.Google Scholar
Beyries, S. 1988a. Functional variability of lithic sets in the Middle Paleolithic, in Dibble, H. and Montet White, A. (eds.), Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, 213–24. Philadelphia: University Museum Press.Google Scholar
Beyries, S. 1988b. Industries Lithiques: Traçeologie et Technologie. London: British Archaeological Report, International Series 411 (1 and 2).Google Scholar
Beyries, S. 1988c. Étude tracéologique des racloirs du niveau Iia, in Tuffreau, A. and Sommé, J. (eds.), Le Gisement Paléolithique Moyen de Biache-Saint-Vaast (Pas-de-Calais), Volume I, 215–230, Pas-de-Calais: Mémoires de la Société Préhistorique Française, Tome 21.Google Scholar
Beyries, S. & Walter, P.. 1996. Racloirs et colorants à Combe-Grenal: Le problème de la retouche Quina. Quaternaria Nova VI:167–185.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1981. Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1984. The Faunal Remains from Klasies River Mouth. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1985. Human ancestors: changing views of their behavior. – Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4:292–327.Google Scholar
Bocherens, H., Billiou, D., Mariotti, A., Patoumathis, M., Otte, M., Bonjean, D., & Toussaint, M. 1999. Paleoenvironmental and paleodietary implications of isotopic biogeochemistry of last interglacial Neanderthal and mammal bones in Scladina Cave (Belgium). Journal of Archaeological Sciences 26:599–607.Google Scholar
Boeda, E., Connan, J. Dessort, D. Muhesen, S. Mercier, N. Valladas, H. & Tisnerat, N.. 1996. Bitumen as a hafting material on Middle Paleolithic artefacts. Science 380:336–338.Google Scholar
Boeda, E., Connan, J. & Muhesen, S.. 1998. Bitumen as a hafting material on Middle Paleolithic Artefacts from the El Kowm Basin, Syria. In Akazawa, T. Aoki, K., and Bar-Yosef, O. (eds.) Neanderthals and Modern Humans in Western Asia. New York: Plenum: 181–204.Google Scholar
Bonnichsen, R., Hodges, L. Ream, W. Field, K. Kirner, D. Selsor, K. & Taylor, R.. 2001. Methods for the study of ancient hair: Radiocarbon dates and gene sequences from individual hairs. Journal of Archaeological Science 28:775–785.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1969. Reflections on typology and technology in the Paleolithic. Arctic Anthropology 6: 1–29.Google Scholar
Brace, C. 1995. Bio-cultural interaction and the mechanism of mosaic evolution in the emergence of a “modern” human morphology. American Anthropologist 97:4–11.Google Scholar
Brace, C. 1997 Modern human origins: Narrow focus or broad spectrum? in Clark, G. and Willermet, C. (eds.), Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research, 11–27. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brauer, G. & Stringer, C.. 1997. Models, polarization and perspectives on modern human origins, in Clark, G. and Willermet, C. (eds.), Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research, 191–201. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brom, T. 1996. Microscopic identification of feathers and feather fragments of palearctic birds. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 56:181–204.Google Scholar
Brunner, H., & Coman, B.J.. 1974 The identification of mammalian hair. Melbourne: Inkata Press.Google Scholar
Burke, A. 2000. Hunting in the Middle Paleolithic. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 10:281–285.Google Scholar
Catling, D. & Grayson, J. 1982. Identification of Vegetable Fibres. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Chase, P.G. 1989. How different was Middle Paleolithic subsistence? A zooarchaeological perspective on the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition. In Mellars, P. and Stringer, C. (eds.) The Human Revolution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 321–337.Google Scholar
Chase, P., Armand, D., Debenath, A., Dibble, H., & Jelinek, A.J. 1994. Taphonomy and zooarchaeology of a Mousterian faunal assemblage from La Quina, Charente, France. Journal of Field Archaeology 221:289–305.Google Scholar
Chase, P. 1998. Archéozoologie. In Nouvelles fouilles à La Quina: Résultats preliminaries (A. Debenath & A.J. Jelinek, eds.), Gallia Préhistoire 40: 60–65.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 2002. Neanderthal archaeology: implications for our origins. American Anthropologist 104:50–67.Google Scholar
Clark, J.D. 1969. Kalambo Falls Prehistoric Site, Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conard, N. & Prindiville, T.. 2000. Middle Paleolithic hunting economies in the Rhineland. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 10:286–309.Google Scholar
Debenath, A., & Jelinek, A.J.. 1998. Nouvelles fouilles à La Quina: Résultats preliminaires. Gallia Préhistoire 40:29–74.Google Scholar
D’Errico, F., Zilhao, J.. Julien, M. Baffier, D. & Pelegrin, J.. 1998. Neanderthal acculturation in western Europe? A critical review of the evidence and its interpretation. Current Anthropology 39: S1–S44a.Google Scholar
Eastham, A. 1989. Cova Negro and Gorham’s Cave: Evidence of the place of birds in Mousterian communities. In Clutton-Brock, J., (ed.), The Walking Larder: Patterns of domestication, pastoralism, and predation. London: Unwin Hyman: 350–57.Google Scholar
Fahn, A. 1982. Plant Anatomy. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Fogel, M., & Tuross, N. 1999. Transformation of plant biochemical to geological macromolecules during early diagenesis. Oecologia 120:336–346.Google Scholar
Fullagar, R.L.K. 1991. The role of silica in polish formation. Journal of Archaeological Science 18:1–24.Google Scholar
Grace, R. 1990. The limitations and applications of use-wear analysis. Aun 14:9–14.Google Scholar
Grayson, D. & Delpech, F.. 2002. Specialized early Upper Palaeolithic hunters in south-western France? Journal of Archaeological Science 29:1439–1449.Google Scholar
Gaudzinski, S. 1999. Middle Paleolithic bone tools from the open-air site Salzgitter-Lebenstedt (Germany). Journal of Archaeological Science 26:125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, B.L. 1994. Investigations of stone tools function through use-wear, residue and Dna analyses at the Middle Paleolithic site of La Quina, France. Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Hardy, B.L. 1998. Microscopic residue analysis of stone tools from the Middle Paleolithic site of Starosele, Crimea, Ukraine. In Monigal, K. and Chabai, V. (eds.) The Middle Paleolithic of the Western Crimea, Vol. 2. Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l’Université de Liège: pp. 179–196.Google Scholar
Hardy, B.L. & Garufi, G.T.. 1998. Identification of woodworking on stone toolsthrough residue and use-wear analyses: Experimental results. Journal of Archaeological Science 25:177–184.Google Scholar
Hardy, B.L & Kay, M.. 1998. Stone tool function at Starosele: Combining use-wear and residue analyses. In Monigal, K. and Chabai, V. (eds.) The Middle Paleolithic of the Western Crimea, Vol. 2. Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l’Université de Liège: 197–209.Google Scholar
Hardy, B.L., Kay, M. Marks, A.E. & Monigal, K.. 2001. Stone tool function at the paleolithic sites of Starosele and Buran Kaya Iii, Crimea: Behavioural Implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 98: 10972–10977.Google Scholar
Hardy, B.L., Raman, R., & Raff, R.A.. 1997. Recovery of mammalian Dna from Middle Paleolithic stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 24(7):601–12.Google Scholar
Hather, J. 1993. An Archaeobotanical Guide to Root and Tuber Identification, Volume I, Europe and South West Asia. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Henri-Martin, G. 1956. Les gisements de La Quina. Comptes rendus du 15éme congrès préhistorique de France, 135–8.Google Scholar
Henri-Martin, G. 1958. Relevé altimétrique à la Quina et nouvelles observations. Bullétin de la Société Française 55:656–60.Google Scholar
Henri-Martin, G. 1964. La dernière occupation Moustérienne de La Quina (Charente). Datation par le radiocarbone. Comptes Rendues Hébdomadaires de l’Académie des Sciences 258:3533–35.Google Scholar
Henri-Martin, G. 1969. La Quina, in Guillen, Y. (ed.), Berry-Poitou-Charentes:Livret-Guide de l’Excursion A4, INQUA, 91–94. Bordeaux: Biscaye-Frères.Google Scholar
Henri-Martin, G. 1976. La Quina, in Rigaud, J-P. & Vandermeersch, B. (ed.), Sudouest (Aquitain et Charente): Livret-Guide de l’Excursion A4, Union International des Sciences Pré- et Protohistoriques, 158–162. Gap: Louis-Jean.Google Scholar
Hoadley, R. 1990. Identifying Wood: Accurate Results with Simple Tools. Newtown, Ct: Taunton Press.Google Scholar
Holliday, T. 1997. Body proportions in late Pleistocene Europe and modern human origins. Journal of Human Evolution 32:423–447.Google Scholar
Hurcombe, L. 1988. Some criticisms and suggestions in response to Newcomer et al. (1986). Journal of Archaeological Science 15:1–10.Google Scholar
Irwin, D., Kocher, T. & Wilson, A.. 1991. Evolution of the cytochrome b gene in mammals. Journal of Molecular Evolution 32, 128–144.Google Scholar
Jelinek, A.J., Debenath, A. & Dibble, H.. 1989. A preliminary report on evidence related to the interpretation of economic and social activities at the site of La Quina (Charente), France, in Otte, M. (ed.), L’H omme de Néandertal, Volume 6, La Subsistence, 99–106. Liége: Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l’Université de Liége.Google Scholar
Kardulias, N. & Yerkes, R.. 1996. Microwear and metric analysis of threshing sledge flints from Greece and Cyprus. Journal of Archaeological Science 23:657–666.Google Scholar
Kealhoffer, L., Torrence, R. & Fullagar, R.. 1999. Integrating phytoliths within use-wear/residue studies of stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:527–546.Google Scholar
Loy, T.H. 1993. The artefact as site: an example of the biomolecular analysis of organic residues on prehistoric tools. World Archaeology 25(1):44–63.Google Scholar
Madella, M., Jones, M. Goldberg, P. Goren, Y., & Hovers, E., 2002. The exploitation of plant resources by Neanderthals in Amud Cave, Israel: The evidence from phytoliths studies. Journal of Archaeological Sciences 29:703–719.Google Scholar
Martin, H. 1907. Recherches sur l’evolution du Moustérien dans le gisement de La Quina (Charente): Volume I, (fascicule 1), Ossements utilisés. Paris: Schleicher Frères.Google Scholar
Martin, H. 1909. Recherches sur l’evolution du Moustérien dans le gisement de La Quina (Charente): Volume I, (fascicule 2), Ossements utilisés. Paris: Schleicher Frères.Google Scholar
Martin, H. 1923a. Recherches sur l’evolution du Moustérien dans le gisement de La Quina (Charente):Volume II, Industries lithique. Angoulême: Mémoires de La Société Archéologique et Historique de la Charente.Google Scholar
Martin, H. 1923b. Recherches sur l’evolution du Moustérien dans le gisement de La Quina (Charente): Volume III, L’homme fossile. Paris: Schleicher Frères.Google Scholar
Martin, H. 1926. Recherches sur l’evolution du Moustérien dans le gisement de La Quina (Charente): Volume Iv, L’enfant fossile de La Quina. Angoulême: Imprimerie Ouvrière.Google Scholar
Martin, H. 1936. Comment vivait l’homme de La Quina à l’epoque Moustérienne? La Préhistoire 5:7–23.Google Scholar
Mason, S.L.R., Hather, J.G. & Hillman, G. C.. 1994. Preliminary investigation of the plant macro-remains from Dolni Vestonice Ii, and its implications for the role of plant foods in Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europe. Antiquity 68:48–57.Google Scholar
Mercier, N. & Valladas, H.. 1998. Datations. In Nouvelles fouilles à La Quina: Résultats preliminaries (A. Debenath & A.J. Jelinek, eds.), Gallia Préhistoire 40: 70–71.Google Scholar
Moss, E.H. 1987. A review of “Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests”. Journal of Archaeological Science 14:473–81.Google Scholar
Mason, S.L.R., Hather, J.G. & Hillman, G.C.. 1994. Preliminary investigation of the plant macro-remains from Dolní Vestonice Ii, and its implications for the role of plant foods in Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europe. Antiquity 68:48–57.Google Scholar
Newcomer, M., Grace, R. & Unger-Hamilton, R.. 1986. Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests. Journal of Archaeological Science 13:203–17.Google Scholar
Newcomer, M., Grace, R. & Unger-Hamilton, R.. 1988. Microwear methodology: a reply to Moss, Hurcombe, and Bamforth. Journal of Archaeological Science 15:25–33.Google Scholar
Oakley, K., Andrews, P. Keeley, L. & Clark, J.. 1977. A reappraisal of the Clacton spearpoint. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 43:13–30.Google Scholar
Odell, G. & Odell-Vereecken, F.. 1980. Verifying the reliability of lithic use-wear assessments by “blind tests”: the low-power approach. Journal of Field Archaeology 7:87–120.Google Scholar
Opsahl, S. & Benner, R.. 1999. Decomposition dynamics of senescent blades of the seagrass halodule wrightii aschers in a subtropical lagoon. Marine ecology progress series 94:191–205.Google Scholar
Owen, L. 1996. Der Gebrauch von Pflanzen im Jungpaläolithikum Mitteleuropas. Ethnographisch-Archäologische Zeitschrift 37:119–146.Google Scholar
Pearsall, D. 2000. Paleoethnobotany: A Handbook of Procedures. 2nd Edition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Plisson, H. & Beyries, S.. 1998. Pointes ou outils triangulaires? Données fonctionelles dans le Moustérien Levantin. Paléorient 24:5–24.Google Scholar
Plisson, H. & Mauger, M.. 1988. Chemical and mechanical alterations of microwear polishes: an experimental approach. Helenium 28:3–16.Google Scholar
Porsild, A.E. 1951. Plant life in the arctic. Canadian Geographical Journal 42:120–145.Google Scholar
Renault-Mikovsky, J. 1998. Palynologie. In Nouvelles fouilles à La Quina: Résultats preliminaries (A. Debenath & A.J. Jelinek, eds.), Gallia Préhistoire 40:65–68.Google Scholar
Richards, M., Pettitt, P., Trinkaus, E., Smith, F., Paunovic, M., & Karavanic, I. 2000. Neanderthal Diet at Vindija and Neanderthal Predation: The Evidence from Stable Isotopes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 97: 7663–7666.Google Scholar
Rigaud, J-P., Simek, J. & Thierry, G.. 1995. Mousterian fires from Grotte Xvi (Dordogne, France). Antiquity 69:902–912.Google Scholar
Ruff, C. 1994. Morphological adaptation to climate in modern and fossil hominids. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 37:65–107.Google Scholar
Schiegel, S., Lev-Yuden, S. Bar-Yosef, O. ElGorsey, A. & Weiner, S.. 1992. Siliceous aggregates from prehistoric wood ash: a major component of sediments in Kebara and Hayonim caves (Israel). Israel Journal of Earth Sciences 43:267–278.Google Scholar
Shea, J.J. 1988. Spear points from the Middle Paleolithic of the Levant. Journal of Field Archaeology 15:441–50.Google Scholar
Shea, J.J. A functional study of the lithic industries associated with hominid fossils in the Kebara and Qafzeh Caves, Israel. In The Human Revolution, Mellars, P. and Stringer, C. (eds.), Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 611–25.Google Scholar
Shea, J.J. 1992. Lithic microwear analysis in archaeology. Evolutionary Anthropology 1(4):143–50.Google Scholar
Shea, J.J. 1993. Lithic use-wear evidence for hunting by Neanderthals and early modern humans from the Levantine Mousterian. In Peterkin, G.L. Bricker, H.M., and Mellars, P. (eds.),– Hunting and Animal Exploitation in the Later Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Eurasia. American Anthropological Association Archaeological Paper 4, pp. 189–97.Google Scholar
Shea, J.J. 1998. Neanderthal and early modern human behavioural variability: a regional-scale approach to lithic evidence for hunting in the Levantine Mousterian. Current Anthropology 39(supplement): S45–S78.Google Scholar
Stiner, M.C. 1991. The faunal remains from Grotta Guattari: A taphonomic perspective. Current Anthropology 32:103–117.Google Scholar
Stiner, M.C. 1994. Honor among Thieves: A Zooarchaeological Study of Neanderthal Ecology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stiner, M.C. & Kuhn, S.L.. 1992. Subsistence, technology, and adaptive variation in Middle Paleolithic Italy. American Anthropologist 94:306–339.Google Scholar
Stringer, C. 1992. Replacement, continuity, and the origins of Homo sapiens, in Brauer, G. and Smith, F. (eds.), Continuity or Replacement: Controversies in Homo sapiens Evolution, 9–24, Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
Stringer, C. & Andrews, P.. 1988. Modern human origins. Science 241:773–774.Google Scholar
Stringer, C., & Gamble, C.. 1993. In Search of the Neanderthals. New York: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Tattersall, I. 1998. Becoming Human. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Teerink, B. 1991. Hair of West European Mammals: Atlas and Identification Key. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Texier, P-J., Brugal, J-P. Lemorini, C. & Wilson, L.. 1998. Fonction d’un site Paléolithique moyen en marge d’un territoire: l’abri de La Combette (Bonnieux, Vaucluse). Economie Préhistorique: Les Comportments de Subsistance au Paléolithique, Rencontres Internationales d’Archéologie et d’Histoire d’Antibes.’ 18: 326–348.Google Scholar
Thieme, H. 1997. Lower paleolithic hunting spears from Germany. Nature 385:807–810.Google Scholar
Trinkaus, E. 1981. Neanderthal limb proportions and cold adaptation, in Stringer, C. (ed.), Aspects of Human Evolution, 187–224, London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Vaquero, M., Vallverdu, J. Rosell, J. Pasto, I. & Allue, E.. 2001. Neanderthal behavior at the Middle Paleolithic site of Abric Romaní, Capellades, Spain. Journal of Field Archaeology 28:93–114.Google Scholar
Williamson, B.S. 1996. Preliminary stone tool residue analysis from Rose Cottage Cave. Southern African Field Archaeology 5:36–44.Google Scholar
Wolpoff, M. 1992. Theories of modern human origins, in Brauer, G. and Smith, F. (eds.), Continuity or Replacement: Controversies in Homo sapiens Evolution, 24–63, Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
Wolpoff, M. 1997. Human Evolution. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wolpoff, M. & Caspari, R.. 1997. What does it mean to be modern? in Clark, G. and Willermet, C. (eds.), Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research, 28–44. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar