Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:49:54.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

National archaeology in the age of European integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Kristian Kristiansen*
Affiliation:
Ministry of the Environment, The National Forest and Nature Agency, Slotsmarken 13, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark

Extract

The context

Archaeologists of the 1990s are confronted with an apparent paradox: our legal and economic framework is based upon the preservation of the national heritage, while our research objectives and research methods are rather defined by larger regional, European or even international frameworks. In fact this is nothing new – we have always been serving both the present and the past, and will continue to do so. The question that is raised in this context, therefore, is whether the 1990s will see a changed balance between the interests of the present, and what effect that may have upon the working conditions of archaeologists. Will national archaeology be strengthened or can we hope that it will begin to merge into a coming European perception of history?

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Sarunas Milisauskas wrote in the June issue about the future of archaeology in eastern Europe. Western Europe, although enjoying no revolutions, is also undergoing profound changes that will have archaeological effect. Kristian Kristiansen, head of the archaeological administration in Denmark, looks to that European future

References

Horne, D. 1984. The great museum. London: Pluto. Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 1981. A social history of Danish archaeology (1805-1975), in Daniel, G. (ed.), Towards a HISTORY OF ARCHAEOLOGY: 20–44. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 1989. Fortids Kraft of Kæmpestyrke: om national og politisk brug af fortiden, in L., Hedeager & Schousboe, K. (ed.), Brugte Historier: Ti essays om brug og misbrug af historien. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. ms. The strength of the past and its great might an essay on the use of the past.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, D. 1985. The past is a foreign country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
One World Archaeology series. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G. 1984. Alternative archaeologies: nationalist, colonialist, imperialist, Man n.s. 19.Google Scholar