Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:49:10.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

More from the cutting edge: further discoveries of Clactonian bifaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

John McNabb
John McNabb*
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An important step in our knowledge of the British Lower Palaeolithic has been the finding that its two recognized components, ‘Clactonian’ and ‘Acheulean’, are not ranged into a simple sequence; the exact relationship between the two is the subject of much debate. What does this do to interpretations of Swanscombe, classic site of the Lower Thames Valley, which has been studied in terms of stratigraphic succession?

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 268 , June 1996 , pp. 428 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashton, N. M.. Mcnabb, J., Irving, B., Lewis, S. & Parfitt, S.. 1994. Contemporaneity of Clactonian and Acheulian flint industries at Bamham, Suffolk, Antiquity 68: 585–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, N. & McNabb, J.. 1994. Bifaces in perspective, in Ashton, N. & David, A. (od.), Stories in stone: 182–91. London: Lithic Studies Society. Lithic Studies Occasional Paper 4.Google Scholar
Bridgland, D. 1994. Quaternary of the Thames. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Chandler, R. H. 1928/29. On the Clactonian industry at Swans-combe, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia 6: 79–116.Google Scholar
Chandler, R. H. 1935. The Clactonian industry and report of a field meeting at Swanscombe (111), Proceedings of the Geologists Association 46: 43–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, R. H. 1942. Reply to Bull (1942), Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 53:21.Google Scholar
Conway, B. 1996a. The geology outside the National Nature Reserve, 1968–72, in Conway et al. (ed.): 67–87.Google Scholar
Conway, B. 1996b. The geology inside the National Nature Reserve, 1968–72, in Conway et al. (ed.): 89–116.Google Scholar
Conway, B. 1996c. An historical perspective on geological research at Barnfield Pit, Swanscombe, in Conwav et al. (ed.): 9–30.Google Scholar
Conway, B., Mcnabb, J. & Ashton, N. (ed.). 1996. The 1969-1972 Waechter excavations at the Barnfield Pit, Sivnns-combe. London: British Museum. Occasional paper 94.Google Scholar
Dennell, R. 1990. Progressive gradualism, imperialism, and academic fashion: Lower Palaeolithic archaeology in the 20th century, Antiquity 64: 549–58.Google Scholar
Dewey, H., 1932. The Palaeolithic deposits of the Lower Thames Valley, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society London 88: 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon-Walker, B. T. 1944. Letter to Guy Maynard dated 22.09.1944. Ipswich Museum.Google Scholar
Martston, A. T. 1937. An additional note on the stratigraphy of the Barnfield deposits, in Conway et al. (1990): Appendix II.Google Scholar
Martston, A. T. 1938, Letter to Hawkes, C. F. C., 16 January. British Museum, P. & R.B.A. Marston archive.Google Scholar
Martston, A. T. 1938. Letter to C.F.C. Hawkes, 28 February. British Museum, P. & R.B.A. Marston arehive.Google Scholar
Martston, A. T. 1942. Flint industries of the High Terrace at Swanscombe. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 53: 106.Google Scholar
Martston, A. T. 1959. Typed note, dated 29 August 1959, associated with Marston collection, box 638. British Museum, P. & R. B.A. Marstonarchive.Google Scholar
Mcnabb, J. 1992. The Clactonian: British Lower Palaeolithic flint technology in bifuce and non-hiface assemblages. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Mcnabb, J. 1996. Through the looking glass, in Conway et al. (ed.): 31–51.Google Scholar
Mcnabb, J. & Ashton, N.. 1992. The cutting edge: bifaces in the Clactonian, Lithics 13: 4–10.Google Scholar
Mcnabb, J. & Ashton, N.. 1995. Thoughtful flakers: reply to Mithen, Cambridge Archaeological journal 5: 289–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S. 1994. Technology and society during the Middle Fidatocene: hominid group size, social learning and industrial variability, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 4: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S. 1995. A reply [to Ashton & McNabb 1995], Cambridge Archaeological Journal 5: 298–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. B. 1990. Amey's Eartham pit, Boxgrove, in Turner, C. (ed.), SEQS: the Cromer Symposium. Norwich. 1990. field excursion guide book: 62–77. Cambridge: SEQS.Google Scholar
Wymer, J. 1985. Palaeolithic sites of East Anglia. Norwich: Ceo Books.Google Scholar