Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:58:03.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Models in Prehistory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and News
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

[1] Chang, R. C., Rethinking Archaeology (1967), 90.Google Scholar ‘A type ... is both a model consisting of elements and itself an element. . . .’

[2] Piggott, S., Approach to Archaeology (1959)Google Scholar, ch. 1.

[3] Chorley, R. J. and Haggett, P. (eds.), Models in Geography (1967)Google Scholar; cf. also, Comments of Dr Daniel’s Seminar on Lowther, G. R., ‘Epistemology and Archaeological Theory’, Current Anthropology 3, 1962, 504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

[4] Braithwaite, R. B., Scientific Explanation (1960), 93Google Scholar.

[5] Lévi-Strauss, C., Anthropologie Structurale (1958), 308Google Scholar.

[6] Leach, E. R., Rethinking Anthropology (1961), 2Google Scholar.

[7] C. Renfrew, J. R. Cann and J. E. Dixon, ‘Patterns of Trade: Further Obsidian Analyses from the Near East’, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society XXXIV (forthcoming); also Dixon, J. E., Cann, J. R. and Renfrew, C., ‘Obsidian and the Origins of Trade’, Scientific American, March 1968, 38Google Scholar.

[8] Childe, V. G., ‘The Roots of Hellenism’, Nature, 126, 1930, 340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

[9] R. B. Braithwaite, op. cit., 368.