Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T23:27:16.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Minnesota Petroglyph

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Glyn Daniel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 32 , Issue 128 , December 1958 , pp. 264 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 E. Wahlgren, The Kensington Stone, a Mystery Solved, from which all other quotations in this article, unless otherwise specified, are taken, and which contains a complete bibliography and documentation of all statements.

2 In an article entitled ‘Alleged Norse Remains in America’ which contains a transcript and a photograph of the inscription.

3 Mullsjõ is in Sweden and a runic inscription was ‘discovered’ there in 1953. This runic hoax provided the only ‘inscription’ in runes which was in modern English. The style of the runes is about 1000 A.D. and part of the message reads, ‘Joe Doakes went East 1953. He discovered Europe. Holy smoke!’