Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:46:29.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Late Glacial human reoccupation of north-western Europe: new approaches to space-time modelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Paul G. Blackwell  and
Caitlin E. Buck
Paul G. Blackwell
Affiliation:
Department of Probability and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Hicks Building, Hounsfield Road, Sheffield S3 7RH (1 Email: [email protected]; 2 Email: [email protected])
Caitlin E. Buck
Affiliation:
Department of Probability and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Hicks Building, Hounsfield Road, Sheffield S3 7RH (1 Email: [email protected]; 2 Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How and when was northern Europe reoccupied at the end of the last Ice Age? Radiocarbon dates from the earliest post-glacial contexts provide one answer: they offer a sequence in which the regions of Europe, from the Upper Rhine to Britain, saw the return of humans. The authors use Bayesian methods to model a chronology and thus arrive at a sequence with clear assessments of uncertainty.

Keywords

Northern EuropeUpper PalaeolithicsettlementcolonisationmodellingBayesian inference
Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 77 , Issue 296 , June 2003 , pp. 232 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AMMERMAN, A.J. & CAVALLI-SFORZA., L.L. 1971. Measurement of the rate of spread of early farming in Europe. Man 6:674—688.Google Scholar
AMMERMAN, A.J. & CAVALLI-SFORZA., L.L.—1984. The Neolithic transition and the genetics of populations in Europe. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
BLACKWELL, P.G. & BUCK., C.E. 2001. Integrating spatial and temporal information from the Late Glacial human reoccupation of North Western Europe. Department of Probability and Statistics Research Report 508/01, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
BLOCKLEY, S.P.E. DONAHUE, R.E. & POLLARD., A.M. 2000. Radiocarbon calibration and the Late Glacial occupation of northwest Europe. Antiquity, 74:112—119.Google Scholar
BUCK, C.E. CAVANAGH, W.G. & LITTON., C.D. 1996. The Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
BUCK, C.E. CHRISTEN, J.A. & JAMES., G.N. 1999. BCal: an on-line Bayesian radiocarbon calibration tool. Internet Archaeology, 7. (http://intarch.ac.uk/ journal/issue7/buck/).Google Scholar
HOUSLEY, R.A. GAMBLE, C.S. & PETTITT., P. 2000. Reply to Blockley, Donahue and Pollard. Antiquity, 74:119—121.Google Scholar
HOUSLEY, R.A. GAMBLE, C.S. STREET, M. & PETTITT., P. 1997. Radiocarbon evidence for the Lateglacial Human Recolonisation of Northern Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 63:25—54.Google Scholar
NEEDHAM, S. RAMSEY, C.B. Coombs, D. CARTWRIGHT, C. & PETTITT., P. 1997. An independent chronology for British Bronze Age metalwork: the results of the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator programme. Archaeological Journal 154:55—107.Google Scholar
RAMSEY, C.B. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon, 37(2):425—30.Google Scholar
RAMSEY, C.B. 2000. OxCalProgram v3.5 Manual. (http://www.rlaha.ox.ac.uk/oxcal/ arch_cmb.htm#sum).Google Scholar
STEELE, J. ADAMS, J. & SLUCKIN., T. 1998. Modelling Paleoindian dispersals (Paleoecology and human populations). World Archaeology 30(2):286—305.Google Scholar
STUIVER, M. REIMER, P.J. BARD, E. Beck, J.W. BURR, G.S. HUGHEN, K.A. KROMER, B. MCCORMAC, F.G. PLICHT, J.V.D. & SPURK., M. 1998. INTCAL98 radiocarbon age calibration, 24,000 - 0 cal BP. Radiocarbon, 40:1041—1083.Google Scholar
ZEIDLER, J.A. BUCK, C.E. & LITTON, C.D. 1998. The integration of archaeological phase information and radiocarbon results from the Jama River Valley, Ecuador: a Bayesian approach. Latin American Antiquity 9(2):135—159.Google Scholar