Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:47:24.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lapita sites of the Bismarck Archipelago

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

C. Gosden ,
J. Allen ,
W. Ambrose ,
D. Anson ,
J. Golson ,
R. Green ,
P. Kirch ,
I. Lilley ,
J. Specht  and
M. Spriggs
C. Gosden
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, La Trobe University, Bundoora VA 3083, Australia
J. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, La Trobe University, Bundoora VA 3083, Australia
W. Ambrose
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
D. Anson
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology & Ethnology, Otago Museum, Dunedin, New Zealand
J. Golson
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
R. Green
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland, New Zealand
P. Kirch
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720, USA
I. Lilley
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, University of Western Australia, Nedlands WA, Australia
J. Specht
Affiliation:
Australian Museum, College Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia
M. Spriggs
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Lapita question

The prehistory of the western Pacific has, for the last 30 years, been dominated by the problem of the origins of the present Polynesian and Melanesian cultures (Terrell 1988). In 1961 Golson drew attention to the distribution of highly decorated Lapita pottery, now known to date from between 3500 BP and 2000 BP, which crossed the present-day division between Melanesia and Polynesia. Furthermore, sites with Lapita pottery represented the first evidence of occupation on Tonga and Samoa, the most westerly Polynesian islands from which it was thought that the rest of Polynesia was colonized. Lapita pottery came to be associated with a movement of people from Melanesia to Polynesia and was seen to represent the founding group ancestral to later Polynesian groups.

Type
Special section
Information
Antiquity , Volume 63 , Issue 240 , September 1989 , pp. 561 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. 1984. In search of the Lapita homeland, Journal of Pacific History 19: 186–201.Google Scholar
Allen, J., Gosden, C., Jones, R. & White, J.P.. 1988. Pleistocene dates for the human occupation of New Ireland, Northern Melanesia, Nature 331: 707–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambrose, W.R. 1988. An early bronze artefact from Papua New Guinea, Antiquity 62: 483–91.Google Scholar
Ambrose, W. & Duerden, P.. 1982. PIXE analysis in the distribution and chronology of obsidian use in the Admiralty Islands, in W.R. Ambrose & P. Duerden (ed.}, Archaeometry: an Australasian perspective: 83—9. Canberra: uAustralian National University.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. (ed.). 1986. Traditional fishing in the Pacific. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press. Pacific Anthropological Records 37.Google Scholar
Anson, D. 1983. Lapita pottery of the Bismarck Archipelago and its affinities. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Sydney Google Scholar
1986. Lapita pottery of the Bismarck Archipelago and its affinities, Archaeology in Oceania 21: 157–65.Google Scholar
1987. Reply to Kirch et al., Archaeology in Oceania 22: 127–8.Google Scholar
Bafmatuk, F., Egloff, B. & Kaiku, R.. 1980. Islanders: past and present, Hemisphere 25: 77–81.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1979. Man’s conquest of the Pacific. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Best, S. 1987. Long distance obsidian travel and possible implications for the settlement of Fiji, Archaeology in Oceania 22: 31–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downie, J.E., & White, J.P.. 1978. Balof Shelter, New Ireland - report on a small excavation, Records of the Australian Museum 31: 763–802.Google Scholar
Egloff, B. 1975. Archaeological excavations in the coastal Madang area and on Elouae Island of the St Matthias Group, Records of the Papua New Guinea Public Museum and Art Gallery 5: 1—43.Google Scholar
Garanger, J. 1972. Archéologie des Nouvelles Hebrides. Paris: Musée de l’Homme. Publications de la Société des Océanistes 30.Google Scholar
Golson, J. 1961. Report on New Zealand, Western Polynesia, New Caledonia and Fiji, Asian Perspectives 5: 166–80.Google Scholar
1977. No room at the top: agricultural intensification in the New Guinea Highlands, in J. Allen, J. Golson & R. Jones (ed.), Sunda and Sahul: prehistoric studies in southeast Asia, Melanesia and Australia: 601–38. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gorecki, P.P., Bassett, S. & Head, J.. In press. A Lapita site at Lamau, New Ireland mainland, in Allen, J. & Gosden, C. (ed.), Results of the Lapita Homeland Project. Canberra: Australian National University, Department of Prehistory. Occasional papers.Google Scholar
Gosden, C. In press. Prehistoric social landscapes in the Arawe islands, West New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea, Arhcaeology in Oceania.Google Scholar
Green, R.C. 1986. Lapita fishing: the evidence of site SE-RF-2 from the main Reef islands, Santa Cruz group, Solomons, in Anderson (1986): 19–35.Google Scholar
Green, R.C. 1987. Obsidian results from the Lapita sites of the Reef/Santa Cruz Islands, in Ambrose, W.R. & Mummery, J.M.J. (ed.) Archaeometry: further Australasian studies: 239-49. Canberra: Australian National University, Department of Prehistory.Google Scholar
Green, R.C., & Anson, D.. 1987. The Lapita site of Watom: new evidence from the excavations in 1985, Man and Culture in Oceania 3: 121–31.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. 1976. Ethnological and biogeographical significance of pottery sherd from Nissan Island, Papua New Guinea, Fieldiana 66: 35–89.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. 1981. Lapita colonization of the Admiralty Islands, Science 213: 757–9.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. 1982. Archaeology in the Admiralty Islands: some excursions, Bulletin of thelndo-Pacific Prehistory Association 3: 24–6.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. 1983. On the prehistory of western Melanesia: the significance of new data from the Admiralty Islands, Australian Archaeology 16: 115–22.Google Scholar
Kirch, P.V. 1987. Lapita and Oceanic cultural origins: excavations in the Mussau Islands, Bismarck Archipelago, 1985, Journal of Field Archaeology 14: 163–80.Google Scholar
Kirch, P.V. 1988. The Takepalemalai Lapita site and Oceanic prehistory, National Geographic Research 4: 328–42.Google Scholar
Kirch, P.V., & Hunt, T. (ed.). 1988. Archaeology of the Lapita cultural complex: a critical review. Seattle (WA): Burke Museum. Thomas Burke Museum research report 5.Google Scholar
Kirch, P.V., Allen, M.S., Butler, V.L. & Hunt, T.L.. 1987. Is there an early Far Western Lapita province? Sample size effects and new evidence from Eloaua Island, Archaeology in Oceania 22: 123–7.Google Scholar
Lilley, I. 1988. Prehistoric exchange across the Vitiaz Strait, Papua New Guinea, Current Anthropology 29: 513–16.Google Scholar
Mead, S., Birks, L. & Shaw, E.. 1973. The Lapita pottery of Fiji and its associations. Wellington: Polynesian Society. Memoir 38.Google Scholar
Meyer, O. 1909. Funde prähistorischer Töpferei und steinmesser auf Vuatom, Bismarck Arch., Anthropos 4: 1093–5.Google Scholar
Meyer, O. 1910. Funde von Menschenund Tierknochen, von prähistorischer Töpferei und Steinwerkzeugen auf Vuatom, Bismarck-Archipel., Anthropos 5: 1160–1.Google Scholar
Specht, J. 1968. Preliminary report of excavations on Watom Island, Journal of the Polynesian Society 77: 117–34.Google Scholar
Specht, J. 1974. Lapita pottery at Talasea, West New Britain, PNG, Antiquity 68: 302–6.Google Scholar
Specht, J., Lilley, I. & Normu, J.. 1981. Radiocarbon dates from West New Britain, Papua New Guinea, Australian Archaeology 12: 13–15.Google Scholar
Specht, J., Hollis, J. & Pain, C.. N.d. Report on archaeological fieldwork West New Britain, Papua New Guinea. Unpublished MS.Google Scholar
Spriggs, M. 1984. The Lapita cultural complex, Journal of Pacific History 19: 202–23.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., & Reimer, P.J.. 1986. A computer program for radiocarbon age calibration, Radiocarbon 28: 1022–30.Google Scholar
Swadling, P. 1986. Lapita shellfishing: evidence from the sites in the Reef/Santa Cruz group, Southeast Solomons, in Anderson (1986): 137–48.Google Scholar
Terrell, J. 1988. History as a family tree, history as an entangled book: constructing images and interpretations of prehistory in the South Pacific, Antiquity 62: 642–57.Google Scholar
White, J.P., & Downie, J.E.. 1983. Excavations at Lesu, New Ireland, Asian Perspectives 23: 194–220.Google Scholar
Wickler, S., & Spriggs, M.. 1988. Pleistocene human occupation of the Solomon Islands, Melanesia, Antiquity 62: 703–6.Google Scholar