Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:06:37.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrial archaeology: a thematic or a period discipline?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Marilyn Palmer
Marilyn Palmer*
Affiliation:
Department of History, The University, Leicester LE1 7RH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A thematic or a period discipline?

Industrial archaeology has generally been defined as a thematic discipline, concerned with only one aspect of man’s past activity. Although the term ‘archaeology of industry’ was used in the 19th century, it was Michael Rix who used the phrase ‘industrial archaeology’ in print for the first time (Rix 1955). He later defined industrial archaeology as ‘recording, preserving in selected cases and interpreting the sites and structures of early industrial activity, particularly the monuments of the Industrial Revolution’ (Rix 1967: 5). The emphasis on the term ‘industrial monument’ followed a need to define an industrial class of Ancient Monument so that some examples would be scheduled. Industrial archaeology, then, grew from the need to record and preserve standing structures threatened with demolition rather than an inherent desire to understand more about the historical period of the monuments. It was perhaps felt that understanding of the industrial revolution period was more readily arrived at by other means, particularly written historical evidence. During the ‘rescue’ years of the 1960s and 1970s, archaeology was one of the two areas of fastest university expansion and very popular in extra-mural teaching. But none of the archaeology departments took up industrial archaeology, although many of the extra-mural departments did; it is largely as a part-time, amateur interest that industrial archaeology has flourished ever since. The author’s post as an industrial archaeologist in the Leicester archaeology department is one of the first occasions on which the specialism has been given a place in full-time undergraduate archaeology courses.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 64 , Issue 243 , June 1990 , pp. 275 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

If industrial archaeology is defined by its industrial subject-matter, then is it a theme within archaeology that runs back to prehistoric flint-mines and metal workshops? Or it is to be defined by period, as the archaeology of the industrial society that follows post-medieval? And, if it is concerned with documented history and standing structures, is it archaeology at all?

References

Bick, D.E. 1989. The beam engine house in Wales, Industrial Archaeology Review 12 (1): 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, R.A. 1972. Industrial archaeology in Britain. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Caffyn, L. 1986. Workers’ housing in west Yorkshire 1750-1920. London: Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of England and West Yorkshire Metropolitan County Council.Google Scholar
Clark, CM. & Alfrey, J.. 1987. Nuffield survey: first and second interim reports. Ironbridge: The Institute of Industrial Archaeology Google Scholar
Cosson, N. 1975. The BP book of industrial archaeology. Newton Abbot: David & Charles.Google Scholar
Cranstone, D. 1985. The Moira Furnace: a Napoleonic blast furnace in Leicestershire. Coalville: North West Leicestershire District Council.Google Scholar
Cranstone, D. 1989. The archaeology of washing floors: problems, potentials and priorities, Industrial Archaeology Review 12 (1): 40–9.Google Scholar
Giles, C & Goodall, I.H. 1986. Framing a survey of textile mills: RCHM.E’s West Riding experience, Industrial Archaeology Review 9 (1) 71–81.Google Scholar
Higgins, D. 1989. Perceiving the pipe, AIA Bulletin 10 (4): 1–2.Google Scholar
Hudson, K. 1963. Industrial archaeology: an introduction. London: John Baker.Google Scholar
Hughes, S. 1988. The archaeology of the Montgomeryshire Canal. Aberystwyth: Royal Commission on Ancient and Historical Monuments in Wales.Google Scholar
Palmer, M. 1983. ‘The Richest in All Wales!’: the Welsh Potosi or Esgair Hir and Esgair Fraith lead and copper mines of Cardiganshire. Sheffield: Northern Mines Research Society.Google Scholar
Palmer, M. & Neaverson, P.A.. 1987. The Basset Mines: their history and industrial archaeology. Sheffield: Northern Mines Research Society.Google Scholar
Palmer, M. 1989a. Nineteenth century tin and lead dressing: a comparative study of the field evidence, Industrial Archaeology Review 12 (1): 20–39.Google Scholar
Palmer, M. 1989b. The comparative archaeology of tin and lead dressing in Britain during the nineteenth century, Bulletin of the Peak District Mines Historical Society 10 (6): 316–53.Google Scholar
Raistrick, A. 1972. Industrial archaeology: an historical survey. London: Eyre Methuenv.Google Scholar
Rix, M. 1955. Industrial archaeology, Amateur Historian 2 (8): 225–9.Google Scholar
Rix, M. 1967. Industrial archaeology M., Rix. London: Historical Association M., Rix.Google Scholar
Stratton, M. & Trinder, B.. 1988. Stanley Mill, Post-Medieval Archaeology 22: 143–80.Google Scholar
Mills, Textile. 1988 Special issue of Industrial Archaeology Review 10 (2).Google Scholar
Wilson, A. 1988. The excavation of the Clydach ironworks, Industrial Archaeology Review 11 (1): 16–36.Google Scholar