Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:50:57.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

India and the Druids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and News
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burrorw, R. 1799. A proof that the Hindus had the binomial theorem, Asiatic Researches, 2, 487–97 (reprinted from the original Calcutta edition of 1789).Google Scholar
Concreve, H. 1847. The antiquities of the Neilgherry hills, including an inquiry into the descent of the Thautawars or Todas, Madras Journal of Literature and Science, 14, 77146.Google Scholar
Markham, C.R. 1878. A memoir on the Indian surweys (London).Google Scholar
Maurice, T. 1801. Indian antiquities (London), 6.Google Scholar
Mitra, R.L. 1858. Buddhism and Odinism—their similarities; illustrated by extracts from Professor Holmboe’s memoir on the ‘Traces de Buddhisme en Norvège.’, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 27, 4669.Google Scholar
Schmid, B. 1849. Remarks on the origin and languages of the aborigines of the Nilgiris suggested by the papers of Captain Congreve and the Rev. W. Taylor on the supposed Celto-Scythic antiquities in the south of India, Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 3, 50–3.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. 1851. Ancient remains at the village of Jiwarji near Ferozabad on the Bhima, Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 3, 179–96, 185–91.Google Scholar
Wise, T. 1857. Notes on some of the Buddhist opinions and monuments of Asia, compared with the symbols on the ancient sculptured ‘standing stones’ of Scotland, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 12, 255–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar