Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:56:48.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetics, ethics and archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Martin P. Evison
Martin P. Evison*
Affiliation:
Research School of Archaeology & Archaeological Science, University of Sheffield, 2 Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 4DT, England. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A further contribution on the issues raised by modern genetics, and on their relationship to the material evidence offered by archaeological remains.

Type
Reports
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 269 , September 1996 , pp. 512 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annas, G. J. & Grodin, M. A. (ed.) 1992. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code, human rights in human experimentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. 1995a. Genome diversity alarms [editorial], Nature 377: 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. 1995b. Genetic expectations [editorial], Nature 373: 644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boles, C.T., Snow, C. C. & Stover, E.. 1995. Forensic DNA testing on skeletal remains from mass graves: a pilot project in Guatemala, Journal of Forensic Sciences 40 (3): 349–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, C. L. 1995. Region does not mean ‘race’ – reality versus convention in forensic anthropology, Journal of Forensic Sciences 40 (2): 171–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 1993. Archaeology: the loss of nerve, in Yoffee, N. & Sherratt, A. (ed.), Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?: 133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, D. 1995. Genetics diversity proposal fails to impress international ethics panel, Nature 377: 373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byne, W. 1994. The biological evidence challenged, Scientific American 270 (5): 27–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, A. L. 1992. The doctors' trial and analogies to the Holocaust in contemporary bioethical debates, in Annas & Grodin (ed.): 258–75.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., King, M. C., Kidd, K. K., Feldman, M. & Weiss, K. M.. 1992. American Anthropologists and the human genome: a call for help, Anthropology Newsletter September 1992: 52.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Menozzi, P. & Piazza, A.. 1994. The history and geography of human genes. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1981. The mismeasure of man. London: Norton.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. & Yalouri, E.. 1996. Antiquities as symbolic capital in modern Greek society, Antiquity 70: 117–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M. 1996. A comment on ‘The potential misuse of genetic analyses and the social construction of “race” and “ethnicity”’ by Mirza & Dungworth, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 15 (1): 107–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keast, S. 1996. The enemy of science is within, Nature 379: 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, K.A.R. 1995. But professor, why teach race identification if races don't exist?, Journal of Forensic Sciences 40 (5): 797–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Bras, H. & Todd, E.. 1981. L'invention de la France: atlas anthropologique et politique. Paris: Livre de Poche.Google Scholar
Levay, S. & Hamer, D. H.. 1994. Evidence for a biological influence in male homosexuality, Scientific American 270 (5): 21–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C. 1991. The doctrine of DNA: biology as ideology. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Maddox, J. 1995. The prevalent mistrust of science, Nature 378: 435–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirza, M. N. & Dungworth, D. B.. 1995. The potential misuse of genetic analyses and the social construction of ‘race’ and ‘ethnicity‘, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 14 (3): 345–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluciennik, M. 1996. Genetics, archaeology and the wider world, Antiquity 70: 13–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, R. N. 1992. Nazi doctors, racial medicine, and human experimentation, in Annas, & Grodin, (ed.): 17–31.Google Scholar
Reich, W. T. 1995. Encyclopaedia ofbioethics. New York (NY): Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rose, S., Lewontin, R. C. & Kamin, L. J.. 1984. Notin our genes: biology, ideology and human nature. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Terrell, F.E. & Stewart, P. J.. 1996. The paradox of human population genetics at the end of the 20th century, Reviews in Anthropology 25: 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vines, G. 1995. Genes in black and white, New Scientist 147 (1985): 34.Google Scholar
Weiss, K. M. 1996. Biological anthropology, Nature 379: 293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed