Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:26:09.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flake production at the Lower Palaeolithic site of Holon (Israel): implications for the origin of the Levallois method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Michael Chazan
Michael Chazan*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, 100 St George Street, Toronto ONT, Canada M5S 1A1. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The analysis of flake production at the late Lower Palaeolithic site of Holon (Israel) suggests that the introduction of the Levallois method was an abrupt event related to a shift in the design of tools.

Keywords

LevalloistoolknappingIsrael
Type
News & notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 74 , Issue 285 , September 2000 , pp. 495 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boëda, E. 1991. Approche de la variabilité des systèmes de production lithique des industries du paléolithique inférieure et moyen: chronique d’une variabilité attendue, Technique et culture 17–18: 31–79.Google Scholar
Boëda, E. 1995. Levallois: A volumetric construction, methods, a technique, in Dibble, & Bar-Yosef, (ed.): 41–68.Google Scholar
Boëda, E. 1997. Technogenèse de systèmes de production lithique au Paléolithique inférieur et moyen en Europe occidentale et au Proche-Orient. Habilitation thesis, Université de Paris X-Nanterre.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1961. Typologie du Paléolithique Ancien et Moyen. Paris: Presses CNRS.Google Scholar
Chazan, M. 1997. Redefining Levallois, Journal of Human Evolution 33: 719–35.Google Scholar
Chazan, M. In press. Typological analysis of the Lower Paleolithic site of Holon, Israel, Mitekufat Haeven: Journal of the lsrael Prehistoric Society.Google Scholar
Dibble, H. 1995. Biache-Saint-Vaast, Level lia: A comparison of approaches, in Dibble, & Bar-Yosef, : 93–116.Google Scholar
Dibble, H.L. & Bar-Yosef, O. (ed.). 1995. The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology. Madison (WI): Prehistory Press.Google Scholar
Geneste, J.M. 1985. Analyse lithique d’industries mousteriennes du Périgord. Ph.D dissertation, University of Bordeaux I.Google Scholar
Goren-Inbar, N. & Belfer-Cohen, A.. 1998. The technological abilities of the Levantine Mousterians: Cultural and mental capacities, in Akazawa, T. Aoki, K. & Bar Yosef, O.. (ed.), Neanderthals and modern humans in Western Asia: 205–22. New York (NY): Plenum.Google Scholar
Gvirtzman, G., Shachnai, E. Bakler, N. & Ilani, S.. 1984. Stratigraphy of the Kurkar Group (Quaternary) of the Coastal Plain of Israel, GSI Current Research 1983–1984: 70–82.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Y. 1967. Lithostratigraphy of the Mishash Formation, Northern Negev, Israel Journal of Earth Sciences 16: 57–73.Google Scholar
Mercier, N., Valladas, H. Valladas, G. & Reyss, J.-L.. 1995. TL dates of burned flint from Jelinek’s excavations at Tabun and their implications, Journal of Archaeological Science 22: 495–509.Google Scholar
Perpère, M. (1986). Apport de la typométrie à la définition des éclats Levallois, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 83: 115–18.Google Scholar
Porat, N., Zhou, L.P. Chazan, M. Noy, T. & Horwitz, L.K.. 1999. Lower Paleolithic open-air site of Holon, Israel — luminescence and ESR dates, Quaternary Reserch 51: 328–41.Google Scholar
Yizraeli, T. 1967. A lower Paleolithic site at Holon, Israel Exploration Journal 17: 144–52.Google Scholar