Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:50:49.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early Holocene shell fish hooks from Lene Hara Cave, East Timor establish complex fishing technology was in use in Island South East Asia five thousand years before Austronesian settlement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

Sue O’Connor
Affiliation:
The Division of Archaeology and Natural History, Research School of Asian and Pacific Studies, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. (Email: [email protected])
Peter Veth
Affiliation:
Research Program, The Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Acton Peninsula, Lawson Crescent, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia. (Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Discovery of a well-stratified fish hook from a cave sequence on East Timor shows a fishing technology developed at least 5000 years before the Austronesian expansion through Island South East Asia and into the Pacific. The fish hook is fashioned from shell and has been radiocarbon dated to 9741 ± 60 b.p.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. 2000. From beach to beach: the development of maritime economies in prehistoric Melanesia, in O’Connor, S. & Veth, P. (ed.). East of Wallace’s line: studies of past and present maritime societies in the Indo-Pacific region. Modern Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia 16: 137–76. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1997. Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian archipelago (2nd edition). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Glover, I.C. 1986. Archaeology in Eastern Timor, 1966–67. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, ANU. Terra Australis 11.Google Scholar
Green, R.C. 2003. The Lapita horizon and traditions – signature for one set of oceanic migrations, in Sand, C. (ed.). Pacific archaeology: assessments and prospects. Proceedings of the international conference for the 50th anniversary of the first Lapita excavation (July 1952), Koné-Nouméa 2002: 95120, Nouméa: Le Cahiers de l’Archéologie en Nouvelle-Calédonie 15.Google Scholar
Kirch, P.V. 1987. Lapita and oceanic cultural origins: excavations in the Mussau islands, Bismarck archipelago, 1985. Journal of Field Archaeology 14: 163–80.Google Scholar
O’Connor, S., Spriggs, M. & Veth, P.. 2002a. Excavation at Lene Hara Cave establishes occupation in East Timor at least 30 000–35 000 years ago. Antiquity 76: 4550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, S., Spriggs, M. & Veth, P.. 2002b. Direct dating of shell beads from Lene Hara Cave, East Timor. Australian Archaeology 55: 1821.Google Scholar
O’Connor, S., Veth, P. & Barham, A.J.. 1999. Lacunae in occupation deposits in northern Australia. Quaternary International 59: 6170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, S. 2003. Austronesian spread into Southeast Asia and Oceania: where from and when?, in Sand, C. (ed.) Pacific archaeology: assessments and prospects. Proceedings of the international conference for the 50th anniversary of the first Lapita excavation (July 1952), Koné-Noumé a 2002: 5470, Nouméa: Le Cahiers de l’Archéologie en Nouvelle-Calédonie 15.Google Scholar
Spriggs, M. 1997. The Island Melanesians. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, A. & Allen, J.. 1999. Pleistocene shell technologies: evidence from Island Melanesia, in J. Hall & I. McNiven (ed.) Australian Coastal Archaeology: 291–7. Research papers in Archaeology and Natural History 31. Canberra: Department of Archaeology and Natural History, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Szabo, K. & Summerhayes, G.. 2002. Worked shell artefacts – new data from early Lapita, in Bedford, S., Sand, C. & Burley, D. (ed.) Fifty Years in the field essays in honour and celebration of Richard Shutler Jr’s archaeological career. Auckland: New Zealand Archaeological Association Monograph 25.Google Scholar