Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:31:13.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dynamics of wealth and poverty in the Transegalitarian societies of Southeast Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Brian Hayden
Brian Hayden*
Affiliation:
Archaeology Department, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding how differential wealth develops between households in villages is one key to understanding how socioeconomic inequalities develop; a key theoretical issue for archaeologists. An ethnoarchaeological perspective in Southeast Asia gains major insights into how socioeconomic inequalities emerged and were maintained, with numerous implications for other cereal and stock based prehistoric cultures, such as those of Neolithic Europe.

Keywords

wealthfeastingtransegalitarianSoutheast Asiadomestic animals
Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 75 , Issue 289 , September 2001 , pp. 571 - 581
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alting von Geusau, L. 1983. Dialectics of Akhazan: the interiorizations of a perennial minority group, in McKinnon, J. & Bhruksasri, W (ed.), Highlanders of Thailand: 243–77. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boguckl, P. 1993. Animal traction and household economies in Neolithic Europe, Antiquity 67: 492–503.Google Scholar
Burch, E., Jr. 1975. Eskimo kinsmen. St Paul (MN): West Publishing.Google Scholar
Burch, E., Jr. 1980. Traditional Eskimo societies in northwest Alaska, Senri Ethnological Studies A: 253–304.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. 1996. The Ethno-economic context, in Environmental and social management plan for Nakai-Nam Theun catchment and corridor areas. Vientiane: IUCN.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 1998. Akha feasting. Unpublished MA thesis, Archaeology Department, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2001. Akha feasting: an ethnoarchaeological perspective, in Dietler & Hayden (ed.): 144–67.Google Scholar
Condominas, G. 1977. We have eaten the forest. New York (NY): Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. 1984. Resource scarcity and the Hmong response. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Dietler, M. & Hayden, B.. 2001. Feasts: archaeological and ethnographic perspectives on food, politics and power. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. & Isherwood, B.. 1979. The world of goods. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Falvey, L. 1977. Ruminants in the highlands of northern Thailand. Chiang Mai: Thai-Australian Highland Agronomy Project, Tribal Research Institute, Chiang Mai University.Google Scholar
Gregg, A. 1988. Foragers and farmers. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayden, B. 1990. Nimrods, piscators, pluckers, and planters, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9: 31–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, B. 1992. Models of domestication, in Gebauer, A.B. & Price, T.D. (ed.), Transitions to agriculture in prehistory: 11–19. Madison (WI): Prehistory Press.Google Scholar
Hayden, B. 1995. A new overview of domestication, in Price, T.D. & Gebauer, A. , (ed.), Last hunters–first farmers: 273–99. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Hayden, B. 1997. The Pithouses of Keatley Creek. San Antonio (TX): Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Hayden, B. & Vuonc, Tran Quoc. N.d. Report on ethnographic work among the Ta Oi and Rhade.Google Scholar
Keswani, P. 1994. The social context of animal husbandry in early agricultural societies, fournal of Anthropological Archaeology 13: 255–77.Google Scholar
Kunstadter, P. 1978. Subsistence agricultural economies of Lua’ and karen hill farmers, in Kunstadter, P., Chapman, E. & Sabhasri, S. (ed.), Farmers in the forest: 74–133. Honolulu (HI): University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 1956. The political systems of highland Burma. Boston (MA): Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B.. 1961. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York (NY): E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A.G. 1981. Plough and pastoralism: aspects of a secondary products revolution, in Hodder, I., Isaac, G. & Hammond, N. (ed.), Pattern of the past: 261–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shubert, B. 1986. Proposals for farming systems-oriented crop research of Wawi highland agricultural research station in northern Thailand. Berlin: Center for Advanced Training in Agricultural Development, Technical University of Berlin.Google Scholar
Strathern, A. 1971. Pig complex and cattle complex: some comparisons and counterpoints, Mankind 8: 129–36.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1991. Rethinking the Neolithic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Visitpanich, T. & Falvey, L.. 1980. A survey of the highland pig industry, Thai fournal of Agricultural Science 13: 259–67.Google Scholar
Whittle, A. 1985. Neolithic Europe: a survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yan Yunxiang. 1996. The flow of gifts. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.Google Scholar