Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:55:10.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Druids as Fact and Symbol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

D. Ellis Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Professor Stuart Piggott's book is the first serious attempt for over forty years to deal systematically with a full range of sources concerning the druids. Sir Thomas Kendrick's study The Druids, A Study in Keltic Prehistory (London, 1927; re-issued New York, 1966), still enjoys an enviable reputation as a comprehensive treatment of the varied source-material on which an account of the druids can be based. It would be quite wrong to suggest that scholars have not in the meantime tried to understand more fully some of the complexity of this material, but we can fairly claim that it is only within the last nine or ten years that we have had a spate of publications attempting a new critical analysis of various aspects of this field of study. Incidentally, an earlier work of considerable importance that is not included in Piggott's bibliography is J. Vendryes, 'La religion des Celtes', in Les rel%ions de I'Europe ancienne, iii ('Mana', Introduction rf I'histoire des religions 2), Paris, 1948.

Type
Articles
Information
Antiquity , Volume 43 , Issue 170 , June 1969 , pp. 132 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, W. 1968. ‘Invasion, Diffusion, Evolution?’, antiquity, 1968, 194.Google Scholar
Dudley, D. R. and Webster, G. 1965. The Roman Conquest of Britain. London.Google Scholar
Duval, P.-M. 1966. ‘Posidonios et la Gaule’, Revue des études anciennes, LXVIII, 1966, 346.Google Scholar
Fleuriot, L. 1964. Dictionnaire des gloses en vieux breton. Paris (79 s.v. barcot, 150 s.v. dorguid).Google Scholar
Foster, I. , LL. 1966. Review of Celtic Heritage, by A. Rees and B. Rees, Celtica, VII, 231.Google Scholar
Guyonvarc’h, CH.-J. 1960. ‘Les noms celtiques du “chêne”, du “druide” et du “roitelet” ‘, Ogam, XII, 49.Google Scholar
Guyonvarc’h, CH.-J. 1963. ‘Keltische Wortsymbolik’, Kairos, III, 1963, 189.Google Scholar
Guyonvarc’h, CH.-J. 1966. ‘Le Druide (*dru-(y)id-es) et le fou (*dru-to-s)’ and ‘Remarques sur le nom des Druides, *dru- (u)id-es “très savants” ‘, Ogam, XVIII, 109–11.Google Scholar
Le Roux, F. 1961. Les Druides. Paris. (For a double review of this book see Duval and Bachellery, Etudes celtiques, XI/2, 1966/7, 518. See also MacWhite, Journal des savants, 1961, 181).Google Scholar
Tierney, J. J. 1960. ‘The Celtic Ethnography of Posidonius’, Proc. Royal Irish Acad., LX, Sect. C, 189.Google Scholar
Williams, G. J. 1956. Iolo Morganwg, Vol. 1. Cardiff.Google Scholar
Williams, G. J. 1963. Iolo Morganwg. London (B.B.C. Lecture) (see also Llên Cymru, IV/1 (1956), 15 on Leland, Bale and druidic tradition, VII/3–4 (1963), 213 for the Gorsedd of the Bards and Freemasonry, and (ed. Aneirin Lewis) Agweddau ar Hanes Dysg Gymraeg: Detholiad o Ddarlithiau G. J. Williams (Cardiff, 1969), 124 for the Eisteddfod and the Gorsedd).Google Scholar