Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:24:14.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do all dogs go to heaven? Tracking human-animal relationships through the archaeological survey of pet cemeteries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2020

Eric Tourigny Open the ORCID record for Eric Tourigny [Opens in a new window]
Eric Tourigny*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Classics and Archaeology, Newcastle University, UK (✉ [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pet cemeteries provide a unique opportunity to investigate the development of human-animal relationships, yet few archaeological studies of these cemeteries have been undertaken. This article presents an archaeological survey of gravestones at British pet cemeteries from the Victorian period to the present. These memorials provide evidence for the perceived roles of animals, suggesting the development of an often conflicted relationship between humans and companion animals in British society—from beloved pets to valued family members—and the increasing belief in animal afterlives. The results are discussed in the context of society's current attitude towards animals and the struggle to define our relationships with pets through the mourning of their loss.

Keywords

BritainVictorian periodpet cemeterieshuman-animal relationshipsgrief
Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 94 , Issue 378 , December 2020 , pp. 1614 - 1629
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambros, B.R. 2010. The necrogeography of pet memorial spaces: pets as liminal family members in contemporary Japan. Material Religion 6: 304–35. https://doi.org/10.2752/175183410X12862096296801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K.A., Sielski, C.L., Miles, E.A. & Dunfee, A.V.. 2011. Gardens of stone: searching for evidence of secularization and acceptance of death in grave inscriptions from 1900 to 2009. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying 63: 359–71. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.63.4.dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, S. 2016. Materialising modern cemeteries: archaeological narratives of Assistans Cemetery, Copenhagen (Lund Studies in Historical Archaeology 18). Lund: Media Tryck Lund.Google Scholar
Bardina, S. 2017. Social functions of a pet graveyard: analysis of gravestone records at the metropolitan pet cemetery in Moscow. Anthrozoös 30: 415–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2017.1335099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E. 1994. Vestiges of mortality and remembrance: a bibliography on the historical archaeology of cemeteries. Metuchen (NJ) & London: Scarecrow.Google Scholar
Brandes, S. 2009. Meaning of American pet cemetery gravestones. Ethnology 48: 99–118.Google Scholar
Brown, C.G. 2009. The death of Christian Britain: understanding secularisation 1800–2000. London & New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, A. 1989. The historical dimension in mortuary expressions of status and sentiment. Current Anthropology 30: 437–58. https://doi.org/10.1086/203764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalfen, R. 2003. Celebrating life after death: the appearance of snapshots in Japanese pet gravesites. Visual Studies 18: 144–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860310001632047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, M.N. 2012. The story of Northumberland Park: North Shields, Spital Dene and the Pow Burn. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Summerhill.Google Scholar
Cowles, K.V. 2016. The death of a pet: human responses to the breaking of the bond, in Sussman, M.B. (ed.) Pets and the family: 135–48. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315784656-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curl, J.S. 1972. The Victorian celebration of death. Newton Abbot: David & Charles Ltd.Google Scholar
Desmond, J. 2011. Death and the written record of history: the politics of pet obituaries, in Kalof, L. & Montgomery, G.M. (ed.) Making animal meaning: 99–111. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Dethlefson, E. & Deetz, J.. 1966. Death's heads, cherubs and willow trees: experimental archaeology in colonial cemeteries. American Antiquity 31: 502–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2694382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresser, N. 2000. The horse bar mitzvah: a celebratory exploration of the human-animal bond, in Podberscek, A., Paul, E. & Serpell, J. (ed.) Companion animals and us: 90–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaillemin, B. 2009. Vivre et construire la mort des animaux: le cimetière d'Asnières. Ethnologie Française Nouvelle Série 39: 495–507. https://doi.org/10.3917/ethn.093.0495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgetts, E.A.B. 1893. A cemetery for dogs. Strand Magazine 6: 625–33.Google Scholar
Howell, P. 2002. A place for the animal dead: pets, pet cemeteries and animal ethics in late Victorian Britain. Ethics, Place and Environment 5: 5–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668790220146401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, P. 2015. At home and astray: the domestic dog in Victorian Britain. Charlottesville (VA) & London: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Inoue, M., Kwan, N.C.L. & Sugiura, K.. 2018. Estimating the life expectancy of companion dogs in Japan using pet cemetery data. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 80: 1153–58. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.17-0384CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kean, H. 2013. Human and animal space in historic ‘pet’ cemeteries in London, New York and Paris, in Johnston, J. & Probyn-Rapsey, F. (ed.) Animal death: 21–42. Sydney: Sydney University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1gxxpvf.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. 2008. The virtual pet cemetery—internet world pavilion. Implicit Religion 11: 313–16. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v11i3.313Google Scholar
Lorimer, H. 2019. Dear departed: writing the lifeworlds of place. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44: 331–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, J., Moore, J. & Huntingford, F.. 2016. Characterizing the data in online companion-dog obituaries to assess their usefulness as a source of information about human-animal bonds. Anthrozoös 29: 431–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2016.1181374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangum, T. 2007. Animal angst: Victorians memorialize their pets, in Denenholz Morse, D. & Danahay, M.A. (ed.) Victorian animal dreams: representations of animals in Victorian literature and culture: 15–34. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315235073-2Google Scholar
Meyer, R. (ed.). 1993. Ethnicity and the American cemetery. Bowling Green (OH): Bowling Green State University Popular Press.Google Scholar
Morley, C. & Fook, J.. 2005. The importance of pet loss and some implications for services. Mortality 10: 127–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270412331329849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. 2011. Investigating animal burials: ritual, mundane and beyond (British Archaeological Reports British Series 535). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. https://doi.org/10.30861/9781407308128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. 2016. Mourning the sacrifice: behavior and meaning behind animal burials, in DeMello, M. (ed.) Mourning animals: rituals and practices surrounding animal death: 11–20. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Mytum, H. 1989. Public health and private sentiment: the development of cemetery architecture and funerary monuments from the 18th century onwards. World Archaeology 21: 283–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1989.9980107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mytum, H. 1990. A study of Pembrookshire graveyards: cultural variability in material and language. Bulletin of the C.B.A. Churches Committee 27: 6–11.Google Scholar
Mytum, H. 1993. Death and identity: strategies in body disposal and memorial at North Front cemetery, Gibraltar, in Carver, M. (ed.) In search of cult: archaeological investigations in honour of Philip Rahtz: 187–92. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
Mytum, H. 2000. Recording and analysing graveyards. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Pluskowski, A. (ed.). 2012. The ritual killing and burial of animals: European perspectives. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Pregowski, M.P. 2016a. All the world and a little bit more: pet cemetery practices and contemporary relations between humans and their companion animals, in DeMello, M. (ed.) Mourning animals: rituals and practices surrounding animal death: 47–54. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Pregowski, M.P. 2016b. Human names as companion animal names in Poland, in Pregowski, M.P. (ed.) Companion animals in everyday life: 235–50. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritvo, H. 1987. The animal estate: the English and other creatures in the Victorian Age. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Royal Society for the Protection of Animals. n.d. Pet bereavement. Available at https://www.rspca.org.uk/adviceandwelfare/pets/bereavement (accessed 28 August 2020).Google Scholar
Schuurman, N. & Redmalm, D.. 2019. Transgressing boundaries of grievability: ambiguous emotions at pet cemeteries. Emotion, Space and Society 31: 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2019.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serpell, J. 1986. In the company of animals: a study of human-animal relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sykes, N. 2014. Beastly questions: animal answers to archaeological issues. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Tague, I.H. 2008. Dead pets: satire and sentiment in British elegies and epitaphs for animals. Eighteenth-Century Studies 41: 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2008.0024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarlow, S. 1999. Bereavement and commemoration: an archaeology of mortality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. 1983. Man and the natural world: changing attitudes in England 1500–1800. London: Allan Lane.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2005. Perceptions versus reality: changing attitudes towards pets in medieval and post-medieval England, in Pluskowski, A. (ed.) Just skin and bones? New perspectives on human-animal relations in the historic past: 95–105 (British Archaeological Reports International Series 1410). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2016. Towards a zooarchaeology of animal ‘care’, in Powell, L., Southwell-Wright, W. & Gowland, R. (ed.) Care in the past: archaeological and interdisciplinary perspectives: 169–88. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Tourigny, E., Thomas, R., Guiry, E., Earp, R., Allen, A., Rothenburger, J.L., Lawler, D. & Nussbaumer, M.. 2016. An osteobiography of a 19th-century dog from Toronto, Canada. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 26: 818–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.2483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veldkamp, E. 2009. The emergence of ‘pets as family’ and the socio-historical development of pet funerals in Japan. Anthrozoös 22: 333–46. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279309X12538695316103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. & Edwards, P.. 1993. Butchery of horse and dog at Witney Palace, Oxfordshire, and the knackering and feeding of meat to hounds during the post-medieval period. Post-Medieval Archaeology 27: 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1179/pma.1993.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, T. 2000. Mourning the loss of a companion animal. Bereavement Care 19: 8–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02682620008657481CrossRefGoogle Scholar