Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:48:18.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct radiocarbon dating of megalithic paints from north-west Iberia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

K.L. Steelman ,
F. Carrera Ramírez ,
R. Fábregas Valcarce ,
T. Guilderson  and
M.W. Rowe
K.L. Steelman
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, 205 Laney Hall, University of Central Arkansas, 201 Donaghey Avenue, Conway, AR 72035, USA (Email: [email protected])
F. Carrera Ramírez
Affiliation:
Escola Superior de Conservación e Restauración de Bens Culturais de Galicia, Rua Xeneral Martitegui s/n 36002 Pontevedra, Spain (Email: [email protected])
R. Fábregas Valcarce
Affiliation:
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Historia 1, Facultade de Xeografía e Historia, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain (Email: [email protected])
T. Guilderson
Affiliation:
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Historia 1, Facultade de Xeografía e Historia, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain (Email: [email protected])
M.W. Rowe
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, 205 Laney Hall, University of Central Arkansas, 201 Donaghey Avenue, Conway, AR 72035, USA (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using plasma chemistry, carbon was extracted from charcoal paint samples collected from megalithic monuments in north-west Iberia. Nine accelerator mass spectrometric radiocarbon dates on these paints establish their age to be within 1000 14C years of each other, centred at approximately 5000 BP. These radiocarbon ages for megalithic paintings fall within the proposed time period for north-west Iberian megalithic culture. Multiple layers of paint on some stones show that more than one painting episode occurred.

Keywords

megalithic monumentsdolmensrock paintingsradiocarbon datingAMSplasma-chemical extractionnorth-west Iberia
Type
Method
Information
Antiquity , Volume 79 , Issue 304 , June 2005 , pp. 379 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso, F. & Diéguez, J.M. Bello. 1997. Cronología y periodización del fenómeno megalítico en Galicia a la luz de las dataciones por C-14, in Rodríguez Casal, A. (ed.). O Neolítico Atlático e as orixes do Megalitismo: 507–20. Santiago de Compostela: Actas do Coloquio Internacional, Abril 1996.Google Scholar
Armitage, R.A., Brady, J.E., Cobb, A, Southon, J.R. & Rowe, M.W.. 2001. Mass spectrometric radiocarbon dates from three rock paintings of known age. American Antiquity 66: 471–80.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1994. Conceptual pitfalls in dating of Palaeolithic rock art. Prehistoire et Anthropologie Mediterraneennes 3: 95–102.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 2002. The dating of rock art: a critique. Journal of Archaeological Science 29: 1213–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello Diéguez, J.M. 1995. Arquitectura, arte parietal y manifestaciones escultóricas en el megalitismo noroccidental, in Pérez, F. & Castro, L. (ed.). Arqueoloxía e arte na Galicia prehistórica e romana: 31–98. Museu Arqueolóxico e Histórico de A Coruna.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C.B. 2000. OxCalprogram, 3.5 edn. University of Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit.Google Scholar
Bueno Ramírez, P. & Balbín Behrmann, R.. 1997. Ambiente Funerario en la Sociedad Megalítica Ibérica: Arte Megalítico Peninsular, in A. Rodríguez Casal (ed.). O Neolítico Atlántico e as orixes do Megalitismo: 693–718. Santiago de Compostela: Actas do Coloquio International, Abril 1996.Google Scholar
Carrera Ramírez, F. & Fábregas Valcarce, R. 2003. The protection and management of the megalithic art of Galicia, Spain. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 6: 23–37.Google Scholar
Chaffee, S.D., Hyman, M. & Rowe, M.W.. 1994. Radiocarbon dating of rock paintings, in Whitley, D.S. & Loendorf, L.L. (ed.). New light on old art: recent advances in hunter-gatherer rock art research: 9–12. Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cruz, D.J. 1995a. Cronologia dos monumentos con tumulus do Noroeste e da Beira Alta. Estudos Pré-históricos 3: 81–119.Google Scholar
Cruz, D.J. 1995b. Dólmen de Antelas. Un sepulcro-templo do Neolítico Final. Estudos Pré-históricos 3: 263–4.Google Scholar
Fábregas Valcarce, R. 1995. La realidad funeraria en el Noroeste del Neolítico a la Edad del Bronce, in Fernández, C. (ed.). Arqueoloxía da morte na Península Ibérica desde as Orixes ata o Medievo: 95–125. Excmo: Concello Xinzo de Limia.Google Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M., Ramsey, C.B., Klinken, G.J. Van, Pettitt, P.B., Nielsen-March, C., Etchegoyen, A., Niello, J.O.F., Boschin, M.T. & Llamazares, A.M.. 1998. Methodological issues in the C dating of rock paintings. Radiocarbon 40: 35–44.Google Scholar
Pace, M.F.N., Hyman, M., Rowe, M.W. & Southon, J.R. 2000. Chemical pretreatment on plasma-chemical extraction for C dating of Pecos river genre rock paintings, in Bock, F.G. (ed.). American Indian Rock Art, vol. 24: 95–102. Tucson, AZ: American Rock Art Research Association.Google Scholar
Pettit, P & Bahn, P. 2003. Current problems in dating Palaeolithic cave art: Candamo and Chauvet. Antiquity 77: 134–41.Google Scholar
Rowe, M.W. 2001. Dating by AMS radiocarbon analysis, in Whitley, D.S. (ed.). Handbook of rock art research: 139–66. Walnut Creek, CA AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, M.W. & Steelman, K.L.. 2001. Radiocarbon dating using plasma-chemical extraction. American Laboratory 34: 15–9.Google Scholar
Russ, J., Hyman, M. & Rowe, M.W.. 1992. Direct radiocarbon dating of rock art. Radiocarbon 34: 867–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, M.B. 1986. Radiocarbon dating and the old-wood problem – the case of the Hohokam chronology. Journal of Archaeological Science 13: 13–30.Google Scholar
Shee Twohig, E. 1981. The megalithic art of western Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Steelman, K.L. & Rowe, M.W.. 2005. Dating pictographs: independent dates and their implications for rock art, in Huang, J.K.K. & Culley, E.V. (ed.) Making Marks: Graduate Studies in Rock Art Research at the New Millenium: 17–26. Tucson, AZ: American Rock Art Research Association.Google Scholar
Steelman, K.L., Rowe, M.W., Shirokov, V.N. & Southon, J.R.. 2002. Radiocarbon dates for rock paintings in Ignatievskaya Cave, Russia: Holocene age for supposed Pleistocene fauna. Antiquity 76: 341–8.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Beck, J.W., Burr, G.S., Hughen, K.A., Kromer, B., Mccormac, G., Van Der Plicht, J. & Spurk, M.. 1998. INTCAL98 radiocarbon age calibration, 24000–0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40: 1041–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valladas, H. & Clottes, J.. 2003. Style, chauvet and radiocarbon. Antiquity 77: 142–5.Google Scholar
Van Der Merwe, N.J., Sealy, J. & Yates, R.. 1987. First accelerator carbon-14 date for pigment from a rock painting. South African Journal of Science 83: 56–7.Google Scholar