Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:28:57.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decolonising the museum: the National Museum of the American Indian in Washington, DC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

Claire Smith
Claire Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI), the Smithsonian Institution’s new facility on the National Mall in Washington DC, challenges the very notion of what constitutes a museum. Probably the most theoretically informed museum in North America, this is no shrine to the past: it is a museum that claims both past and present to shape a decolonised future for Indigenous populations.

Keywords

USAmuseumsdecolonisationindigenous archaeology
Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 79 , Issue 304 , June 2005 , pp. 424 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blakeney, M. 1999. Intellectual property in the Dreamtime: protecting the cultural creativity of Indigenous Peoples. WP 11/99. Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre (OIPRC) Electronic Journal of Intellectual Property Rights. http://www.oiprc.ox.ac.uk/EJWP1199.html (accessed 10 November 2004).Google Scholar
Chanda, T. 2001. The metamorphosis of the Guimet Museum. Label France 44 (7). http://www.france.diplomatie.gouv.fr/labelfrance/ENGLISH/ART/guimet/page.html (accessed 7 April 2005).Google Scholar
Clifford, J. 1997. Routes: travel and translation in the late 20th century. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Craven, R. 1996. Using the right words: appropriate terminology for Indigenous Australian Studies. Sydney: School of Teacher Education, University of New South Wales in association with the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation.Google Scholar
Deloria, V. 1988 [1969]. Custer died for your sins. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Deloria, V. 1992. Indians, archaeologists and the future. American Antiquity 57 (4): 595–8.Google Scholar
Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History. 2004. Court decision ruled that Kennewick Man be released for study. Anthropological Newsletter of the Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Winter 2004: 7.Google Scholar
Duncan, C. 1995. Civilizing rituals: inside public art museums. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferguson, A. 2004. New American Indian Museum misses the mark. Bloomberg News [on-line journal] (accessed 10 November 2004).Google Scholar
Fisher, M. 2004. Indian Museum’s appeal, sadly, only skin deep. The Washington Post, 21 September 2004: B01.Google Scholar
Foley, G. 2000. The enlightenment, imperialism, and the evolution of museums. The Koori History web site. http://www.kooriweb.org/foley/essays/essay3.html (accessed 10 November 2004).Google Scholar
Fox, P. 1992. Memory, the museum and the postcolonial world. Meanjin 51 (2): 308–18.Google Scholar
Gould, R.A. & Schiffer, M.B.. 1981. Modern material culture: the archaeology of us. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hemming, S. 2002. The South Australian Museum’s Aboriginal Cultures Gallery: a political, historical and spatial reading? A paper from the Museums Australia National Conference, Adelaide, Australia, March 2002.Google Scholar
Isaacson, K. 2003. Building for the future, in Peck, T. & Siegfried, E. (ed.). Indigenous People and archaeology: proceedings of the 29th annual Chacmool conference: 245–50. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Janke, T. 1999. Our culture, our future: proposals for the recognition of Indigenous cultural and intellectual property. Monograph prepared for Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission.Google Scholar
Janke, T. 2003. Minding culture: case studies on intellectual property and traditional cultural expressions. Monograph prepared for the World Intellectual Property Organisation.Google Scholar
Jules-Rosette, B. 2002. Museé Dapper: new directions for a postcolonial museum. African Arts, Summer 2002.Google Scholar
Kluth, R. & Munnell, K.. 1997. The integration of tradition and scientific knowledge on the Leech Lake Reservation, in Swidler, N., Dongoske, K.E., Anyon, R. & Downer, S.A. (ed.). Native Americans and archaeologists: stepping stones to common ground: 112–9. Walnut Creek (CA): AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Knowledge, Imagery, Vision and Understanding (KIVU) 2004. CIDA handbook for development and Indigenous traditional knowledge. Available at http://www.kivu.com/CIDA%20Handbook/cidacompare.html (accessed 10 November 2004).Google Scholar
Lebovics, H. 2004. Post-colonial museums … how the French and American models differ. History News Network [electronic journal], George Mason University. http://hnn.us/articles/6939.html (accessed 10 November 2004).Google Scholar
Mathe, B. 1998. Kaledoscopic classifications: redefining information in a world cultural context. Paper presented at the 64th International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) General Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, August 1998.Google Scholar
Mcniven, I.J. & Russell, L.. In press. Towards a decolonisation of Australian Indigenous archaeology, in Chippindale, C. & Maschner, H. (ed.). Handbook of archaeological theory. Walnut Creek (CA): Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Meskell, L.M. & Pels, P. (ed.). 2005. Embedding ethics: shifting the boundaries of the anthropological profession. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Morphy, H. 2002. Cross-cultural categories: Yolngu science and local discourses. Paper presented at ninth international conference on Hunting and Gathering Societies (CHAGS), Edinburgh, Scotland, September 2002.Google Scholar
Nez Denetdale, J. 2004. Planting seeds of ideas and raising doubts about what we believe: an interview with Vine Deloria Jr. Journal of Social Archaeology 4 (2): 131–46.Google Scholar
Nicholas, G. & Andrews, T.D. (ed.). 1997. At a crossroads: archaeology and First Peoples in Canada. Burnaby, BC: Archaeology Press, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Nicholas, G. & Bannister, K.P.. 2004. Copywriting the past?: emerging intellectual property rights issues in archaeology. Current Anthropology 45 (3): 327–50.Google Scholar
Noah, T. 2004. The National Museum of Ben Nighthorse Campbell: the Smithsonian’s new travesty. Slate [electronic journal], 29 September 2004. Available at http://slate.msn.com/id/2107140/ (accessed 10 November 2004).Google Scholar
Price, S. 1989. Primitive art in civilized places. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport, J. 1998. The politics of memory: native historical interpretation in the Columbian Andes. Durham & London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Richard, P. 2004. Shards of many untold stories: in place of unity, a mélange of unconnected objects. The Washington Post, 21 September 2004: C01–02.Google Scholar
Rothstein, E. 2004. Museum with an American Indian voice. New York Times, 21 September 2004.Google Scholar
Said, E. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Shepherd, N. 2002. Heading south, looking north: why we need a post-colonial archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues 9 (2): 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, H. 2004. Home away from home: what’s behind the new National Museum of the American Indian. Preservation, The Magazine for the National Trust For Historic Preservation, September/November: 28–33.Google Scholar
Smith, L.T. 1999. Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. & Burke, H.. 2004. Joining the dots … managing the land and seascapes of Indigenous Australia, in Krupnik, I. & Mason, R. (ed.). Northern ethnographic landscapes: perspectives from the Circumpolar Nations: 381–401. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. & Wobst, H.M. (ed.). 2005. Indigenous archaeologies: decolonizing theory and practice. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. 2000. Indigenous archaeologies. Walnut Creek (CA): Alta Mira.Google Scholar
West, W. Richard, JR. 2002. Museums in the 21st century: by whose authority?. Paper presented at the South Australian Museum, Adelaide, Australia, March 2002.Google Scholar
West, W. RICHARD JR. 2004. Remarks on the occasion of the grand opening ceremony, National Museum of the American Indian. Paper presented at the opening of the National Museum of the American Indian, Washington, DC. Available at http://newsdesk.si.edu/kits/nmai/ (accessed 10 November 2004).Google Scholar
Wobst, H.M. 2001. Matter over mind: perishables and the glorification of materiality in archaeology, in Drooker, P. (ed.). Fleeting identities: perishable material culture in the archaeological record: 43–57. Carbondale (IL): Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Wobst, H.M. 2005. Power to the (Indigenous) past and present! or: the theory and method behind archaeological theory and method, in Smith, C. & Wobst, H.M. (ed.). Indigenous archaeologies: decolonising theory and practice: 17–32. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, L.J. 1995. We do not need your past: archaeological chronology and “Indian Time” on the plains, in Duke, P. & Wilson, M. (ed.). Beyond subsistence: plains archaeology and the post-processual critique: 28–45. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, L.J., Hollowell-Zimmer, J. & Vitelli, K. (ed.). 2003. Ethical issues in archaeology. Walnut Creek (CA): Altamira Press.Google Scholar