Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T22:42:46.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The data deluge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2015

Andrew Bevan
Andrew Bevan*
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Archaeology has wandered into exciting but daunting territory. It faces floods of new evidence about the human past that are largely digital, frequently spatial, increasingly open and often remotely sensed. The resulting terrain is littered, both with data that are wholly new and data that were long known about but previously considered junk. This paper offers an overview of this diluvian information landscape and aims to foster debate about its wider disciplinary impact. In particular, I would argue that its consequences: a) go well beyond the raw challenges of digital data archiving or manipulation and should reconfigure our analytical agendas; b) can legitimately be read for both utopian and dystopian disciplinary futures; and c) re-expose some enduring tensions between archaeological empiricism, comparison and theory-building.

Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 89 , Issue 348 , December 2015 , pp. 1473 - 1484
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACCORD n.d. Available at: https://accordproject.wordpress.com/ (accessed 1 July 2015).Google Scholar
Barbujani, G., Oden, N.L. & Sokal, R.R.. 1989. Detecting regions of abrupt change in maps of biological variables. Systematic Zoology 38: 376–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2992403 Google Scholar
Beaumont, M. 2010. Approximate Bayesian computation in evolution and ecology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 41: 379–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, A. 2012. Spatial methods for analysing large-scale artefact inventories. Antiquity 86: 492–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×0006289X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, A. 2014. Mediterranean containerization. Current Anthropology 55: 387–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, A., Conolly, J., Hennig, C., Johnston, A., Quercia, A., Spencer, L. & Vroom, J.. 2013. Measuring chronological uncertainty in intensive survey finds. A case study from Antikythera, Greece. Archaeometry 55: 312–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2012.00674.x Google Scholar
Bevan, A. X.J. Li, Martinón-Torres, M., Green, S., Xia, Y., Zhao, K., Zhao, Zh., Ma, Sh., Cao, W. & Rehren, T.. 2014. Computer vision, archaeological classification and China's Terracotta Warriors. Journal of Archaeological Science 49: 249–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, A., Pett, D., Bonacchi, C., Keinan-Schoonbaert, A., Lombraña González, D., Sparks, R., Wexler, J. & Wilkin, N.. 2014. Citizen archaeologists. Online collaborative research about the human past. Human Computation 1 (2): 183–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.15346/hc.v1i2.9 Google Scholar
Bland, R. 2005. Rescuing our neglected heritage: the evolution of the Government's policy on portable antiquities and treasure. Cultural Trends 14: 257–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548960600573526 Google Scholar
Bonacchi, C. (ed.). 2012. Archaeology and digital communication. Towards strategies of public engagement. London: Archetype Publications.Google Scholar
Box, G.E.P. 1976. Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 71: 791–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, C.E., Cavanagh, W. & Litton, C.D.. 1996. Bayesian approach to interpreting archaeological data. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Casana, J. & Cothren, J.. 2013. The CORONA Atlas Project: orthorectification of CORONA satellite imagery and regional-scale archaeological exploration in the Near East, in Comer, D.C. & Harrower, M.J. (ed.) Mapping archaeological landscapes from space (Briefs in Archaeology 5): 33–43. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Casana, J., Kantner, J., Wiewel, A. & Cothren, J.. 2014. Archaeological aerial thermography: a case study at the Chaco-era Blue J community, New Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science 45: 207–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.02.015 Google Scholar
Chase, A.F., Chase, D.Z., Weishampel, J.F., Drake, J.B., Shrestha, R.L., Slatton, K.C., Awe, J.J. & Carter, W.E.. 2011. Airborne LiDAR, archaeology, and the ancient Maya landscape at Caracol, Belize. Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 387–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.09.018 Google Scholar
Conolly, J., Colledge, S., Manning, K., Dobney, K., Stopp, B. & Shennan, S.J.. 2012. The origin and spread of stock-keeping in the Near East and Europe [dataset]. Archaeology Data Service (collection 1141). http://dx.doi.org/10.5284/1016121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conyers, L.B., Daniels, J.M., Haws, J.A. & Benedetti, M.M.. 2013. An Upper Palaeolithic landscape analysis of coastal Portugal using ground-penetrating radar. Archaeological Prospection 20: 45–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/arp.1439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A. & Green, C.. 2015. Embracing the complexities of ‘Big Data’ in archaeology: the case of the English Landscape and Identities project. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9240-4 [online first]Google Scholar
Cowley, D., Standring, R. & Abicht, M. (ed.). 2010. Landscapes through a lens. Aerial photographs and historic environment. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Crema, E.R. 2012. Modelling temporal uncertainty in archaeological analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 19: 440–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10816-011-9122-3 Google Scholar
Devereux, B.J., Amable, G.S. & Crow, P.. 2008. Visualisation of LiDAR terrain models for archaeological feature detection. Antiquity 82: 470–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×00096952 Google Scholar
Ducke, B. 2014. An integrative approach to archaeological landscape evaluation: locational preferences, site preservation and uncertainty mapping, in Meylemans, E., Poesen, J. & In‘t Ven, I. (ed.) The archaeology of erosion, the erosion of archaeology. Proceedings of the Brussels conference, April 28–30, 2008 (Relicta Monografieën 9 Archeologie): 13–22. Brussels: Flanders Heritage Agency.Google Scholar
Ducke, B., Score, D. & Reeves, J.. 2011. Multiview 3D reconstruction of the archaeological site at Weymouth from image series. Computers and Graphics 35: 375–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2011.01.006 Google Scholar
Dunnell, R.C. 1971. Systematics in prehistory. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Lopez De Pablo, J. & Barton, C.M.. 2015. Bayesian estimation dating of lithic surface collections. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 559–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10816-013-9198-z Google Scholar
Fulford, M. & Holbrook, N.. 2011. Assessing the contribution of commercial archaeology to the study of the Roman period in England, 1990–2004. The Antiquaries Journal 91: 323–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003581511000138 Google Scholar
Geophysics and the Landscape of Hertfordshire n.d. Available at: https://hertsgeosurvey.wordpress.com/ (accessed 1 July 2015).Google Scholar
Green, S., Bevan, A. & Shapland, M.. 2014. A comparative assessment of structure from motion methods for archaeological research. Journal of Archaeological Science 46: 173–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.02.030 Google Scholar
Hanitzsch, T. 2007. Deconstructing journalism culture: toward a universal theory. Communication Theory 17: 367–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00303.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselgrove, C. & Moore, T. (ed.). 2007. The later Iron Age in Britain and beyond. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Hazelton, M.L. & Davies, T.M.. 2009. Inference based on kernel estimates of the relative risk function in geographical epidemiology. Biometrical Journal 51: 98–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810495 Google Scholar
HeritageTogether n.d. Available at: http://heritagetogether.org/ (accessed 1 July 2015).Google Scholar
Herrmann, J.T. 2013. Three-dimensional mapping of archaeological and sedimentary deposits with ground-penetrating radar at Saruq al-Hadid, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Archaeological Prospection 20: 189–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/arp.1456 Google Scholar
Huggett, J. 2014. Promise and paradox: Accessing open data in archaeology, in Mills, C., M. Pidd & Ward, E. (ed.) Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Congress 2012. Studies in the Digital Humanities. Sheffield: HRI Online Publications.Google Scholar
Huson, D.H. & Bryant, D.. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 254–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj030 Google Scholar
Jeffrey, S., Richards, J., Ciravegna, F., Waller, S., Chapman, S. & Zhang, Z.. 2009. The Archaeotools project: faceted classification and natural language processing in an archaeological context. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 367: 2507–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0038 Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 2011. On the nature of empiricism in archaeology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17: 764–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01718.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kansa, E.C., Kansa, S.W. & Watrall, E.. 2011. Archaeology 2.0: new approaches to communication and collaboration. Los Angeles (CA): Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.Google Scholar
Kansa, E.C., Kansa, S.W. & Arbuckle, B.. 2014. Publishing and pushing: mixing models for communicating research data in archaeology. International Journal of Digital Curation 9 (1): 57–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v9i1.301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keay, S., Earl, G., Hay, S., Kay, S., Ogden, J. & Strutt, K.D.. 2009. The role of integrated geophysical survey methods in the assessment of archaeological landscapes: the case of Portus. Archaeological Prospection 16: 154–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/arp.358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsall, J.E. & Diggle, P.J.. 1995. Non-parametric estimation of spatial variation in relative risk. Statistics in Medicine 14: 2335–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780142106 Google Scholar
Kintigh, K.W., Altschul, J.H., Beaudry, M.C., Drennan, R.D., Kinzig, A.P., Kohler, T.A., Limp, W.F., Maschner, H.D.G., Michener, W.K., Pauketat, T.R., Peregrine, P., Sabloff, J.A., Wilkinson, T.J., Wright, H.T. & Zeder, M.A.. 2014. Grand challenges for archaeology. American Antiquity 79: 5–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.79.1.5 Google Scholar
Kvamme, K., Ernenwein, E., Hargrave, M., Sever, T., Harmon, D. & Limp, F.. 2006. New approaches to the use and integration of multi-sensor remote sensing for historic resource identification and evaluation. SERDP Report. Available at: http://cast.uark.edu/home/research/geophysics/multi-sensor-data-fusion-for-historic-resource-identification/data-fusion-final-report (accessed 1 July 2015).Google Scholar
The Megalithic Portal n.d. Available at: http://www.megalithic.co.uk/ (accessed 1 July 2015).Google Scholar
Menze, B.H. & Ur, J.A.. 2012. Mapping patterns of long-term settlement in Northern Mesopotamia at a large scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109: E778–E787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115472109 Google Scholar
MicroPasts n.d. Available at: http://crowdsourced.micropasts.org/ (accessed 29 April 2015).Google Scholar
Milić, M. 2014. pXRF characterisation of obsidian from central Anatolia, the Aegean and central Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 41: 285–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.002 Google Scholar
Neubauer, W., Gugl, C., Scholz, M., Verhoeven, G., Trinks, I., Löcker, K., Doneus, M., Saey, T. & van Meirvenne, M.. 2014. The discovery of the school of gladiators at Carnuntum, Austria. Antiquity 88: 173–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×00050298 Google Scholar
Ortman, S.G., Varien, M. & Gripp, T.L.. 2007. Empirical Bayesian methods for archaeological survey data: an example from the Mesa Verde region. American Antiquity 72: 241–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40035813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poirier, N., Hautefeuille, F. & Calastrenc, C.. 2013. Low altitude thermal survey by means of an automated unmanned aerial vehicle for the detection of archaeological buried structures. Archaeological Prospection 20: 303–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/arp.1454 Google Scholar
Roberts, B.W. & Vander Linden, M.. 2011. Investigating archaeological cultures: material culture, variability, and transmission, in Roberts, B.W. & Vander Linden, M. (ed.) Investigating archaeological cultures: material culture, variability, and transmissions: 1–21. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
rOpenSci n.d. Available at: https://ropensci.org/ (accessed 1 July 2015).Google Scholar
Sala, J. & Linford, N.. 2012. Processing stepped frequency continuous wave GPR systems to obtain maximum value from archaeological data sets, in Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR), 2010 13th International Conference (IEEE Proceedings). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2010.5550093 Google Scholar
Shennan, S. 2011. Descent with modification and the archaeological record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 366: 1070–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0380 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shennan, S.J. & Conolly, J.. 2007. The origin and spread of Neolithic plant economies in the Near East and Europe [dataset]. Archaeology Data Service (collection 452). http://dx.doi.org/10.5284/1000093 Google Scholar
Shennan, S., Downey, S.S., Timpson, A., Edinborough, K., Colledge, S., Kerig, T., Manning, K. & Thomas, M.G.. 2013. Regional population collapse followed initial agriculture booms in mid-Holocene Europe. Nature Communications 4: 2486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3486 Google Scholar
Smith, M.E. & Peregrine, P.. 2012. Approaches to comparative analysis in archaeology, in Smith, M.E. (ed.) The comparative archaeology of complex societies: 4–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stodden, V., Leisch, F. & Peng, R.D. (ed.). 2014. Implementing reproducible research. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
The Survey of Hillforts n.d. Available at: http://www.arch.ox.ac.uk/hillforts-atlas-survey.html (accessed 29 April 2015).Google Scholar
UK Portable Antiquities Scheme n.d. Available at: https://finds.org.uk/ (accessed 29 April 2015).Google Scholar
Vlachidis, A. & Tudhope, D.. 2011. Semantic annotation for indexing archaeological context: a prototype development and evaluation. Metadata and Semantic Research Communications in Computer and Information Science 240: 363–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24731-6_37 Google Scholar
Webley, L., Vander Linden, M., Bradley, R. & Haselgrove, C. (ed.). 2012. Development-led archaeology in north-west Europe. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
White, R.H., Gaffney, C. & Gaffney, V.L.. 2013. Wroxeter, the Cornovii and the urban process. Final report on the Wroxeter Hinterland Project 1994–1997. Volume 2 characterizing the city (Journal of Roman Archaeology supplementary series 68). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Womble, W.H. 1951. Differential systematics. Science 114: 315–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.114.2961.315 Google Scholar
Woodman, P.E. & Woodward, M.. 2002. The use and abuse of statistical methods in archaeological site location modelling, in Wheatley, D., Earl, G. & Poppy, S. (ed.) Contemporary themes in archaeological computing: 22–27. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar