Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:48:02.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The contamination of Pleistocene radiocarbon determinations in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jim Allen  and
Simon Holdaway
Jim Allen
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology, La Trobe University, Bundoora VIC 3083, Australia
Simon Holdaway
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology, La Trobe University, Bundoora VIC 3083, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Previous articles in ANTIQUITY have taken different views of the dating pattern for the human settlement of Australia. Is the apparent limit in the region of 35–40,000 years ago visible in the radiocarbon determinations a real date for the human presence? Or is it an artificial result of the dating method? A comparative study of the dating pattern in archaeological as against non-archaeological contexts may inform.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 69 , Issue 262 , March 1995 , pp. 101 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. 1994. Radiocarbon determinations, luminescence dating and Australian archaeology, Antiquity 68: 339–43.Google Scholar
Anderson, A.J. 1991. The chronology of colonization in New Zealand, Antiquity 65: 767–95.Google Scholar
Bowdler, S. 1991. Some sort of dates at Malakunanja ?: a reply to Roberts et al., Australian Archaeology 32: 50–51.Google Scholar
Colhoun, E.A. 1985. Radiocarbon dates for Tasmania, 1956-1984, Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 119: 39–54.Google Scholar
Colhoun, E.A. 1986. Field problems of radiocarbon dating in Tasmania, Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 120: 1–6.Google Scholar
Dortch, C.E. 1984. Devil’s Lair, a study in prehistory. Perth: Western Australian Museum.Google Scholar
Flood, J. 1989. (1983.) Archaeology of the Dreamtime. Revised edition. Sydney: William Collins.Google Scholar
Gosden, C. & Robertson, N.. 1991. Models for Maten-kupkum: interpreting a late Pleistocene site from southern New Ireland, Papua New Guinea, in Allen, J. & Gosden, C.(ed.), Report of the Lapita Homeland Project: 20–45. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies. Australian National University. Occasional Papers in Prehistory 20.Google Scholar
Hiscock, P. 1990. How old are the artefacts in Malakunanja II?, Archaeology in Oceania 25: 122–4.Google Scholar
Jones, R. 1982. Ions and eons: some thoughts on archaeological science and scientific archaeology, in Ambrose, W. & Duerden, P. (ed.), Archaeometry: an Australian perspective: 22–35. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. Occasional Papers in Prehistory 12.Google Scholar
Jones, R. 1989. East of Wallace’s Line: issues and problems in the colonisation of the Australian continent, in Mellars, P. & Stringer, C. (ed.), The human revolution: behavioural and biological perspectives on the origins of modern humans: 743–82. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, R. 1993. A continental reconnaissance: some observations concerning the discovery of the Pleistocene archaeology of Australia, in Spriggs, M. et al. (ed.), A community of culture: the people and prehistory of the Pacific: 97–122. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University. Occasional Papers in Prehistory 21.Google Scholar
Jones, R. & Johnson, I.. 1985. Deaf Adder Gorge: Lindner Site. Nauwalabila I, in Jones, R. (ed.), Archaeological research in Kakadu National Park: 165–227. Canberra: Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service. Special Publication 13.Google Scholar
Kamminga, J. & Allen, H.. 1973. Report of the archaeological survey, Alligator Rivers Environmental Fact-finding Survey. Darwin: Australian Government Publication.Google Scholar
Manning, N.K. 1990. Matenkupkum and Matenbek: the geoarchaeology of two limestone caves, New Ireland, Papua New Guinea. Unpublished BA (Hons.) thesis, Department of Archaeology, La Trobe University. Google Scholar
Rick, J. 1987. Dates as data: an examination of the Peruvian preceramic radiocarbon record, American Antiquity 52: 55–73.Google Scholar
Roberts, R.G., Jones, R. & Smith, M.A.. 1990a. Stratigraphy and statistics at Malakunanja II: reply to Hiscock, Archaeology in Oceania 25: 125–9.Google Scholar
Roberts, R.G., Jones, R. & Smith, M.A.. 1990b. Early dates at Malakunanja II: a reply to Bowdler, Australian Archaeology 31: 94–7.Google Scholar
Roberts, R.G., Jones, R. & Smith, M.A.. 1994. Beyond the radiocarbon barrier in Australian prehistory, Antiquity 68: 611–16.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B. 1986. Radiocarbon dates and the ‘Old Wood’ problem: the case of the Hohokam chronology, Journal of Archaeological Science 13: 13–30.Google Scholar
Singh, G. & Geissler, E.A.. 1985. Late Cainozoic history of vegetation, fire, lake levels and climate, at Lake George, New South Wales, Australia, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 311: 379–447.Google Scholar
Spriggs, M. & Anderson, A.. 1993. Late colonization of East Polynesia, Antiquity 67: 200–217.Google Scholar
Taylor, R.E. 1987. Radiocarbon dating. Orlando (FL): Academic Press.Google Scholar
White, J.P., with O’Connell, J.F.. 1982. A prehistory of Australia, New Guinea and Sahul. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar