Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:34:21.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Côa petroglyphs: an obituary to the stylistic dating of Palaeolithic rock-art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Robert G. Bednarik*
Affiliation:
International Federation of Rock Art Organizations, PO Box 216, Caulfield South 3162, Australia

Abstract

The Côa petroglyphs, seen in the established framework of rock-art studies, belong in the corpus of west European parietal art of late Pleistocene age, as found in scores of caves and some open-air locations. One of the four researchers who this summer studied the age of the figures using ‘modern rock-art science’ summarizes the group's' conclusions, and states how they kill off the stylistic dating of Palaeolithic rock-art.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahn, P.G., 1995a. Cave art without the caves, Antiquity 69: 231–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahn, P.G. 1995b. Paleolithic engravings endangered in Côa valley, Portugal, La Pintura 21 (3): 13.Google Scholar
Bahn, P.G. 1995c. Outdoor creations of the Ice Age, Archaeology (July/August): 37.Google Scholar
Balbin Behrmann, R. DE, Alcolea Gonzalez, J. Santonja, M. & Perez Martin, R.. 1991. Siega Verde (Salamanca): yacimiento artístico paleolítico al aire libre, in Del paleolítico a la historia: 3348. Salamanca: Musco de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Baptista, A.M., 1983. O complexo de gravuras rupestres do Vale da Casa — (Vila Nova de Foz Côa), Arqueologia 8: 5769.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1986. Parietal finger markings in Europe and Australia, Rock Art Research 3: 3061, 162–70. Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1990/91. Epistemology in palaeoart studies, Origini 15: 5778.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1991. Limits of knowledge, Purakala 2 (1): 2931.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1992.A new method to date petroglyphs, Archaeometry 34 (2): 279–91.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1994a. The Hell’s Canyon petroglyphs in Portugal, Rock Art Research 11: 151–2.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1994b. A taphonomy of palaeoart, Antiquity 68: 6874.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1994c. Art origins, Anthropos 89: 169–80.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1995a. Concept–mediated marking in the Lower Palaeolithic, Current Anthropology 36(4): 605–34.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1995b. More news from Hell’s Canyon, Portugal, AURA Newsletter 12/1: 67.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1995c. The Hell–s Canyon saga continues, Rock Art Research 12 (1): 7072.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1995d. Metamorphology: in lieu of uniformitarianism, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 14 (2): 117–22.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. In press a. The age of the Côa valley petroglyphs in Portugal, Rock Art Research 12 (2).Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. In press b. Only time will tell: a review of the methodology of direct rock art dating, Archaeometry 38 (1).Google Scholar
Beltran, A., 1992. Crisis in traditional ideas about European rock art: the questions of diffusion and convergence, inLorblanchet, M., Rock art in the Old World: 401–13. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts.Google Scholar
Bicho Ferreira, N. 1994. The end of the Palaeolithic and the Mesolithic in Portugal, Current Anthropology 35: 664–74.Google Scholar
Cameron, D.W., 1993. The archaeology of Upper Palaeolithic art: aspects of uniformitarianism, Rock Art Research 10: 317.Google Scholar
Clottes, J., 1995a. Paleolithic petroglyphs at Foz Côa, Portugal, International Newsletter on Rock Art 10: 2. Google Scholar
Clottes, J. 1995b. La grotte Chauvet aujourd’hui, in Chauvct, J.–M., Brunel Deschamps, E. & Hillaire, C., La grotte Chauvet à Vallon–Pont d’Arc: 81116. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Clottes, J. et al. 1995. Les peintures paléolithiques de la Grotte Chauvet–Pont d’Arc, à Vallon–Pont–d‘Arc (Ardèche, France): datations directes et indirectos par la méthode du radiocarbone, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Paris 320: 1133–40.Google Scholar
Conkey, M.W., & Hastorf, C.A. (ed.). 1990. The uses of style in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hernandez Perez, M.S., Ferrer I Marset, P. & Catala Ferrer, E.. 1988. Arte rupestre en Alicante. Alicante: Gráficas Estilo.Google Scholar
Jorge, S.O., et al. 1981. Gravuras rupestres de Mazouco (Freixo da Espada à Cinta), Arqueologia 3: 312.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1971. Préhistoire de l’art occidental. Paris: Mazenod.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, J.D., 1993. Southern African archaeology in the 1990s, South African Archaeological Bulletin 48: 4550.Google Scholar
Lorblanchet, M. & Bahn, P. (ed.). 1993. Rock art studies: the post–stylistic era, or, Where do we go from here? Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Maringer, J. & Verhoeven, T. 1970. Die Steinartefakte aus der Stegodon–Fossilschicht von Mongeruda auf Flores, Indonesien, Anthropos 65: 229–47.Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1986. Theoretical concepts that lead to new analytic methods, modes of enquiry and classes of data, Rock Art Research 3: 95111.Google Scholar
Povoas, L., Zilhão, J., Chaline, J. & Brunet-Lecomte, P. 1992. La faune de rongeurs du Pleistocene Supérieur de la Grotte de Caldeirao (Tomar, Portugal), Quaternaire 3(1): 4047.Google Scholar
Ripoll Perello, E., 1977. The process of schematisation in the prehistoric art of the Iberian Peninsula, in Ucko, P.J. (ed.), Form in indigenous art: 418–28. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Sondaar, P.Y. et al. 1994. Middle Pleistocene faunal turnover and colonization of Flores (Indonesia) by Homoerectus, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Paris 319: 1255–62.Google Scholar
Straus, L.G., 1991. Southwestern Europe at the Last Glacial Maximum, Current Anthropology 32: 189–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangri, D., 1989. !Science, hypothesis testing and prehistoric pictures, Rock Art Research 6: 8395.Google Scholar
Watchman, A., 1995a. Dating the Foz Côa rock engravings: executive summary. Unpublished report to the Portuguese governmentGoogle Scholar
Watchman, A. 1995b. Dating the Foz Côa rock engravings, Portugal. Paper presented to Symposium 10C of the International Rock Art Congress in Turin, 1 September.Google Scholar