Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:17:17.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cemetery or sacrifice? Infant burials at the Carthage Tophet

Phoenician bones of contention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2013

Paolo Xella ,
Josephine Quinn ,
Valentina Melchiorri  and
Peter van Dommelen
Paolo Xella
Affiliation:
1ISCIMA, CNR, Via Salaria km 29 300, I-00015 Monterotondo Stazione (Rome), Italy
Josephine Quinn
Affiliation:
2Worcester College, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 2HB, United Kingdom
Valentina Melchiorri
Affiliation:
3Marie Curie Fellow of the Gerda Henkel Foundation, Biblisch-Archäologisches Institut, University of Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
Peter van Dommelen
Affiliation:
4Joukowsky Institute for Archaeology and the Ancient World, Brown University, Box 1837 / 60 George Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Even if the foundation, rise and eventual demise of Carthage and its overseas territories in the West Mediterranean occurred in much the same space and time as the glory days of Archaic, Classical and Hellenistic Greece and Rome, there is no doubt that the Phoenicians and their Punic successors (to use the conventional terms) have rarely been regarded as fully signed-up members of the ancient world. Reduced to walk-on cameos as skilled silversmiths, agricultural experts, shrewd traders or military strategists, Phoenician and Punic representations tend to be rather stereotypical (Prag 2010, with earlier bibliography), which perhaps should not come as a surprise, as nearly all these portraits have been sketched by outsiders; they certainly do not add up to a coherent ethnographic or political description.

Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 87 , Issue 338 , December 2013 , pp. 1199 - 1207
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, F.D., Burnet, J., Greene, W.C. & Parker, C.P.. 1938. Scholia Platonica (Philological Monographs 8). Haverford (PA): American Philological Association.Google Scholar
Amadasi Guzzo, M.G. 2002. Le iscrizioni del tofet: osservazioni sulle espressioni di offerta, in Gonz´alez Wagner, C. & Ruiz Cabrero, L.A. (ed.) El Molk como concepto del sacrificio P´unico y Hebreo y el final del dios Moloch:93–119. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Fenicios y P´unicos.Google Scholar
Amadasi Guzzo, M.G. 2007-2008. Il tofet. Osservazioni di un'epigrafista. Scienze dell'Antichità 14.1:347-62.Google Scholar
Bartoloni, P. 1986. Le stele di Sulcis. Catalogo. Rome: Istituto per la Civiltà Fenicia e Punica.Google Scholar
Bénichou-Safar, H. 1981. A propos des ossements humains du Tophet de Carthage. Rivista di studi fenici 9:5–9.Google Scholar
Bénichou-Safar, H. 1982. Les tombes puniques de Carthage: topographie, structure, inscriptions et rites funéraires. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Bonnet, C. 2011. On gods and earth: the tophet and the construction of a new identity in Punic Carthage, in Gruen, E.S. (ed.) Cultural identity in the ancient Mediterranean:373-87. Los Angeles (CA): Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
Ciasca, A., Di Salvo, R., Castellino, M. & Di, C. PATTI. 1996. Saggio preliminare sugli incinerati del “tofet” di Mozia. Vicino Oriente 10:317-46.Google Scholar
Cintas, P. 1947. Le sanctuaire punique de Sousse. Revue Africaine 410-411:1–80.Google Scholar
CIS Corpus Inscriptionum Semiticarum. 1881-1962. Corpus Inscriptionum ab Academia Inscriptionum et Litterarum Humaniorum conditum atque Digestum, vol I. Paris: E Reipublicae Typographeo.Google Scholar
Davies, N. 1981. Human sacrifice in history and today. New York: William Morrow & Co.Google Scholar
Docter, R., Smits, E., Hakbijl, T., Stuijts, I. & Van Der Plicht, H.. 2003. Interdisciplinary research on urns from the Carthaginian Tophet and their contents. Palaeohistoria 43-44 (2001-2002):417-33.Google Scholar
Dodds Pennock, C. 2008. Bonds of blood: gender, lifecycle and sacrifice in Aztec culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fedele, F. & Foster, G.V.. 1988. Tharros: ovicaprini sacrificali e rituali del tofet. Rivista di studi fenici 16:29–46.Google Scholar
Finsterbusch, K., Lange, A. & Römheld, K.F.D., in association with Lazar, L.. 2006. Human sacrifice in Jewish and Christian tradition. Leiden & Boston (MA): E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Flaubert, G. 1862. Salammbô. Paris: M. Lévy.Google Scholar
Geer, R.M. 1962. Diodorus Siculus Bibliotheca Historica (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glover, T.R. 1931. Tertullian Apologeticus and De Spectaculis (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, A. 2001. Archaeological theory and scientific practice (Topics in Contemporary Archaeology 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knapp, A.B. 2002. Disciplinary fault lines: science and social archaeology. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 2.1:37–44.Google Scholar
Lamb, W.R.M. 1925. Plato in twelve volumes, vol. 9. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lancy, D.F. 2008. The anthropology of childhood: cherubs, chattel, changelings. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mcgovern, P. 1995. Science in archaeology: a review. American Journal of Archaeology 99:79–142.Google Scholar
Melchiorri, V. 2010. Le Tophet de Sulci (S. Antioco, Sardaigne). État des études et perspectives de la recherche. Ugarit-Forschungen 41 (2009):509-24.Google Scholar
Melchiorri, V. In press. Osteological analyses in the study of the Phoenician and Punic Tophet: a history of the research. Studi epigrafici e linguistici sul Vicino Oriente antico 29–30 (2012-2013).Google Scholar
Moscati, S. 1987. Il sacrificio punico dei fanciulli: realtà o invenzione? Roma: Quaderni dell'Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.Google Scholar
Moscati, S. & Uberti, M.L.. 1985. Scavi al tofet di Tharros: i monumenti lapidei. Roma: Istituto per la Civiltà Fenicia e Punica.Google Scholar
Pearson, L. & Sandbach, F.H.. 1960. Plutarch Moralia (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Prag, J.R.W. 2010. Tyrannizing Sicily: the despots who cried ‘Carthage!’, in Turner, A., Chong-Gossard, K.O. & Vervaet, F. (ed.) Private and public lies: the discourse of despotism and deceit in the Graeco-Roman world (Impact of Empire 11):51–71. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.C. 2011. The cultures of the tophe Identification T. and identity in the Phoenician diaspora, in Gruen, E.S. (ed.) Cultural identity in the ancient Mediterranean:388–413. Los Angeles (CA): Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
Ribichini, S. 1987. Il tofet e il sacrificio dei fanciulli. Sassari: Chiarella.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J., Houghton, F., Macchiarelli, R. & Bondioli, L.. 2010. Skeletal remains from Punic Carthage do not support systematic sacrifice of infants. PLoS ONE 5: e9177.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J., Houghton, F., Bondioli, L. & Macchiarelli, R.. 2012. Bones, teeth, and estimating age of perinates: Carthaginian infant sacrifice revisited. Antiquity 86:738-45.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. 1953. The Annals of Q. Ennius. London: H.K. Lewis for University College London.Google Scholar
Smith, P., Avishai, G., Greene, J. & Stager, L.. 2011. Aging cremated infants: the problem of sacrifice at the Tophet of Carthage. Antiquity 85:859-74.Google Scholar
Stager, L.E. 1980. The rite of child sacrifice at Carthage, in Pedley, J.G. (ed.) New light on ancient Carthage:1–11. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Stager, L.E. 1982. Carthage: a view from the Tophet, in Niemeyer, H.-G. (ed.) Phönizier im Westen: die Beiträge des internationalen Symposium über “Die phönizische Expansion im westlichen Mittelmeerraum” in Köln vom 24 bis 27 April 1979 (Madrider Beiträge 88):155-66. Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Stavrakopoulou, F. 2004. King Manasseh and child sacrifice: biblical distortions of historical realities (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 338). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vella, N. 1996. Elusive Phoenicians. Antiquity 70:245-50.Google Scholar
Xella, P. 2009. Sacrifici di bambini nel mondo fenicio e punico nelle testimonianze in lingua greca e latina—I. Studi epigrafici e linguistici sul Vicino Oriente antico 26:59–100.Google Scholar
Xella, P. 2010. Per un “modello interpretativo” del tofet: il tofet come necropoli infantile?, in Bartoloni, G., Matthiae, P., Nigro, L. & Romano, L. (ed.) Tiro, Cartagine, Lixus: nuove acquisizioni. Atti del convegno internazionale in onore di Maria Giulia Amadasi Guzzo (Quaderni di Vicino Oriente 4):259-79. Rome: Università di Roma <<La Sapienza>>.>.>Google Scholar
Xella, P. In press. Tophet: an overall interpretation. Studi epigrafici e linguistici sul Vicino Oriente antico 29–30 (2012-2013).Google Scholar