Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:32:00.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can a museum explain imperialism?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

N. James*
Affiliation:
*Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER, UK

Extract

Empires produced some of the ancient world's grandest monuments. No doubt that helps to account for successive major exhibitions recently mounted at the British Museum. The First Emperor: China's Terracotta Army closed in April 2008, having drawn more visitors than any other since Treasures of Tutankhamun in 1972 (British Museum 2008: 66). There followed, from July to October, impressive and intriguing pieces on Hadrian, the Roman Emperor of the second century AD. The attention to large political systems is timely (James 2008: 201). Twenty-five years ago, Donald Horne (1984: 252) went so far as to declare that 'in the popularisations … of the huge storehouse of … artifacts … that are such an extraordinary feature of our age. … we may find the only real potential for giving substance to human liberation'. Is this feasible in practice; and, if so, is a state museum with business sponsorship a likely place to find such enlightenment? Studying the archaeology in Hadrian, with The First Emperor as a foil, enabled us to assess these questions.

Type
Debate
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birley, A. R. 1997. Hadrian: the restless emperor. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boatwright, M. T. 1987. Hadrian and the city of Rome. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boatwright, M. T. 2000. Hadrian and the cities of the Roman Empire. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Museum. 2008. Review 2007/8. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Marrais, E. de, Castillo, L. J. & Earle, T.. 1996. Ideology, materialization, and power strategies. Current Anthropology 37: 1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, M. W. 1986. Empires. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. & Saller, G.. 1987. The Roman Empire: economy, society and culture. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Horne, D. 1984. The great museum: the re-presentation of history. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
James, N. 2008. Tutankhamun and the terracotta army. Antiquity 82: 199201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewe, M. 2007. The First Emperor and the Qin Empire, in Portal, J. with Kinoshita, H. (ed.) The First Emperor: China's terracotta army: 5879. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Opper, T. 2008. Hadrian: empire and conflict. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Paulsen, A. C. 1981. The archaeology of the absurd: comments on 'Cultural materialism, split inheritance, and the expansion of ancient Peruvian empires'. American Antiquity 46: 31–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, J. 2007. The First Emperor's tomb: the afterlife universe, in Portal, J. with Kinoshita, H. (ed.) The First Emperor: China's terracotta army: 114–51. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Sinopoli, C. 1994. The archaeology of empires. Annual Review of Anthropology 23: 159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinopoli, C. 2001. Empires, in Feinman, G. M. & Price, T. D. (ed.) Archaeology at the millennium: a sourcebook: 439–71. New York (NY): Kluwer Academic/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, R.D.S. 2001. Cosmos, central authority, and communities in the early Chinese empire, in Alcock, S. E., D'Altroy, T. N., Morrison, K. D. & Sinopoli, C. M. (ed.) Empires: perspectives from archaeology and history: 351–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar