Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:14:59.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Buddhism, Pax Kushana and Greco-Roman motifs: pattern and purpose in Gandharan iconography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

Cibele Aldrovandi  and
Elaine Hirata
Cibele Aldrovandi
Affiliation:
Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil (Email: [email protected])
Elaine Hirata
Affiliation:
Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The authors show how the Gandharan art of early first millennium Afghanistan used Greek and Roman motifs to give an international context to Buddhist sculpture and reduce tension at home and with the neighbours.

Keywords

GandharaGreco-Roman PatternsBuddhismiconographyKushan
Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 79 , Issue 304 , June 2005 , pp. 306 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allchin, F.R. 1995. The Archaeology of Early Historic South Asia: the Emergence of Cities and States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auboyer, J. 1961. La vie quotidienne dans l’Inde ancienne. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Basham, A.L. 1981. The Evolution of the Concept of the Bodhisattva, in Kawamura, L.S. (ed.). The Bodhisattva doctrine in Buddhism: 19–59. Ontario: Waterloo.Google Scholar
Boardman, Sir John. 1994. The Diffusion of Classical Art in Antiquity. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Boardman, Sir John. 1997. Classical Figures in an Indian Landscape, in Allchin, F.R. et al. (ed.). Gandharan Art in Context, East and West Exchanges at the Crossroads of Asia. N. Delhi: Regency Publications.Google Scholar
Bueno, A. 2002. Roma, China e o Sistema Mundial nos Séculos I e III d.C. Rio de Janeiro: UFF.Google Scholar
Coomaraswamy, A.K. 1927. The Origin of the Buddha Image. Art Bulletin 9, n.4: 287–328.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, R. 1991. Hellenistic Elements in the Sculptural Art of the Ganga Yamuna Valley, in Arora, U.P. (ed.). Graeco-Indica – India’s cultural contacts with the Greek world. N. Delhi: Ramanand Vidya Bhawan.Google Scholar
Drennan, R.D. 1996. Statistics for Archaeologists, a commonsense approach. New York & London: Plenum.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1997. Pilgrimage, Religion and Visual Culture in the Roman East, in Alcock, S.E. (ed.). The Early Roman Empire in the East: 178–99. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Faccenna, D. Butkara I. Ismeo: Reports and Memoirs, 6 vols., Rome, 1980–1.Google Scholar
Foucher, A. 1913. L’Origine grecque de l’image du Bouddha, Annales du Museé Guimet, Bibliothéque et vulgarisation. XXXVIII, Chalon-sur-Saone: 231–72.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1983. Local Knowledge: further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1979. Economic and social stress and material culture. American Antiquity 44: 446–54.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1982. Symbols in action. Ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, J.C. 1985. The origin of the Buddha Image: Early Image Traditions and the Concept of Budadar Sanapunya. Studies in Buddhist Art of South Asia: 23–58. N. Delhi: Kanak Pub.Google Scholar
Huntington, J.C. 1990. Early Buddhist Art and the Theory of Aniconism. Art Journal 49: 401–8.Google Scholar
Karttunen, K. 1997. India and the Hellenistic World. Studia Orientalia 83. Helsinki: Finnish Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. 1967. Bakhtine, le mot, le dialogue et les roman. Critique XXIII, 239: 438–65.Google Scholar
Lohuizen-De Leeuw, J.E. 1949. The “Scythian” Period. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Lohuizen-De Leeuw, J.E. 1979. New Evidence with. Regard to the Origin of the Buddha Image. South Asian Archaeology, Fifth International Conference, Berlin: 377–400.Google Scholar
Marshall, Sir John Hubert. 1951. Taxila. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, I. 1987. Burial and Ancient Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport, R. 1971. The sacred in human evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2: 23–44.Google Scholar
Schapiro, M. 1994. Style, in M. Schapiro (ed.). Theory and philosophy of art: style, artist and society: 94–103. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Schopen, G. 1988–89. On Monks, Nuns, and ‘Vulgar’ Practices, the Introduction of the Image Cult into Indian Buddhism. Artibus Asiae 49, 1–2: 153–168.Google Scholar
Shennan, S. 1988. Quantifying Archaeology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Tarn, W.W. 1951. The Greeks in Bactria & India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tissot, F. 1985. Gandhara – La Vie Publique et privée dans l’Inde ancienne. Paris: Librairie D’Amérique et D’Orient Adrien-Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Zwalf, W. 1996. A Catalogue of the Gandhara Sculpture in the British Museum. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar