Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:46:57.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The bronze black rhinoceros from Port Vendres III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

D. Colls ,
C. Descamps ,
M. Faure  and
C. Guerin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Like the wreck Port Vendres II the new wreck of Port Vendres III was broken in many pieces and neither the form of the ship nor the position of its cargo could be observed. The two shipwrecks were certainly caused by the same forces: a ship blown by a very strong wind (Tramontane) from the nearby mountains sought shelter in the natural harbour of Port Vendres. Once inside the harbour it would be unable to change direction and, driven on to the rocks at a place called Redoute Bear, broke up.

At present the Port Vendres III level forms a layer which averages about 10 cm in thickness and covers an area of 25 sq. m with a maximum thickness of 40 cm. This layer is not continuous and is found at depths varying between 5 and 7 m, and at a distance from 5 to 25 m from the coast. Covered by a carpet of Posidonia and sea shells of varying thickness, this site is separated in general from the Port Vendres II site by the same plants, but in places only the type of potsherd allowed us to distinguish one layer from the other as they are in direct contact (FIG. I)

Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 59 , Issue 226 , June 1985 , pp. 106 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auguet, R. 1970. Cruauté et civilisation: les jeux romains (Paris).Google Scholar
Aymard, J. 1951. Essai sur les chasses romaines des origines à la fin du siècle des Antonins (cynegetica) (Paris).Google Scholar
Barthélémy, S. Gourevitch, D.. 1975. Les loisirs des romains (Paris).Google Scholar
Bieber, M. 1915. Die antiken Skulpturen und Bronzen des königlichen Mus. Fridericianum in Cassel (Marburg).Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. D. DE. 1839–1864. Ostéographie des mammifères (Paris).Google Scholar
Blanchet, A. 1941. Le rhinocéros de l’empereur Domitien, Revue numismatique, V, 5—10.Google Scholar
Boucher, S. 1976. Recherches sur les bronzes figurés de Gaule pré-romaine et romaine, Ecole française de Rome, 1—398.Google Scholar
Colls, D., Etienne, R., Lequemont, R., Liou, B. Mayet, F.. 1977. L’épave de Port-Vendres II et le commerce de la Bétique à l’époque de Claude, Archéonautica, 1, 1–145.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1834. Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles, m (Paris, 4th ed.).Google Scholar
Desanges, J. 1964. Note sur la datation de l’expédition de Julius Maternus au pays d’Agisymba, Latomus, XXIII, 713–25.Google Scholar
Desanges, J. 1978. Recherches sur l’activité des méditerranéens aux confins de l’Afrique (Vie siècle avant J.C.—IVe siècle après J.C.). Ecole française de Rome, XXXVM, 1–486.Google Scholar
Dorst, J. Dandelot, J.. 1972. Guide des grands mammifères d'Afrique (Neuchâtel).Google Scholar
Gentili, G. V. 1954. La villa imperiale di Piazza Armerina, I s tit. Poligraf. Stato, LXXXVII, 1–92.Google Scholar
Gowers, W. 1950. The classical rhinoceros, Antiquity, XXIV, 61–71.Google Scholar
Groves, C. P. 1971. Species characters in Rhinoceros horns, Z.f. Sàugetierk., XXXVI, 238–52.Google Scholar
Groves, C. P. 1972. Ceratotherium simum, Mammalian Species, VIN, 1–6.Google Scholar
Guerin, C. 1980. Les rhinocéros (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) du Miocène terminal au Pléistocène supérieur en Europe occidentale. Comparaison avec les espèces actuelles, Docum. Lab. Géol. Lyon., LXXIX, 1–1185.Google Scholar
Guerin, C. Aure, M. F. 1983. Paléofaunes: Mammifères, in Petit-Maire, N. Riser, J., Sahara ou Sahel? Quaternaire récent du Bassin de Taoudenni (Mali), (Marseille), 233—60.Google Scholar
Guggisberg, C. A. W. 1966. SOS Rhino (Nairobi London).Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. 1979. East African mammals. An Atlas of evolution in Africa, III (London).Google Scholar
Mauny, R. 1956. Préhistoire et zoologie: la grande ‘faune éthiopienne’ du Nord-Ouest africain du paléolithique à nos jours, Bull. Inst.franç. d’Afrique noire, XVIII, 246–79.Google Scholar
Poplin, F. 1983. Préambule sur les relations de la faune et de l’homme préhistoriques: la conjoncture de leur étude, in. Dix études en hommage à Jean Bouchud réunies par François Poplin, Mém. Soc. Préhist. franç., XVI, 9–13.Google Scholar
Rookmaaker, L. C. 1981. Early rhinoceros systematics, Soc. Bibliog. Nat. Hist., 111–18.Google Scholar
Rookmaaker, L. C. 1982. A story of horns: early views on rhinoceros classification, Zoonooz, LV, 4—10.Google Scholar
Rostovtzeff, M. 1899. Etude sur les plombs antiques (suite), Revue numismatique, in, 22–61.Google Scholar
Rostovtzeff, M. 1903. Tesserarum urbis romae et suburbi plumbearum sylloge, Acad, impériale Sci. edit. (St Petersburg), 1–440.Google Scholar
Scullard, H. H. 1974. The elephant in the Greek and Roman world (London).Google Scholar
Sidney, J. 1965. The past and present distribution of some African ungulates, Trans. Zool. Soc. London, XXX, 1–397.Google Scholar
Toynbee, J. M. C. 1973. Animals in Roman life and art (London).Google Scholar
Wickens, G. E. 1982. Palaeobotanical speculations and quaternary environments in the Sudan, in, Williams, M. A. J. Adamson, D. A., A land between ttvo Niles. Quaternary geology and biology of the Central Sudan (Rotterdam), 23—50.Google Scholar
Condamin, J. Boucher, S.. 1973. Recherches techniques sur des bronzes de Gaule romaine, IV, Gallia, XXXI, 157–83.Google Scholar
Picon, M., Boucher, S. Condamin, J., “ 1966. Recherches techniques sur des bronzes de Gaule romaine. III. Gallia, XXIV, 189–215.Google Scholar
Picon, M., Condamin, J., Boucher, S., 1968. Recherches techinques sur des bronzes de Gaule romaine, III. Gallia, XXVI, 245–78.Google Scholar