We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Bibilography
COOK, A.B.1895. The bee in Greek mythology,JHS, xv, 1—24.Google Scholar
CUNLIFFE, R.J.1924. A lexicon of the Homeric dialect (London).Google Scholar
DAVARAS, C.1976. Guide to Cretan antiquities (Park Ridge).Google Scholar
DAVENPORT, D.1975. The Cretan ‘hornet’,Antiquity, XLIX, 212—13.Google Scholar
DEMARGNE, P.1930. Bijoux Minoens de Mallia, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellenique, LIV,410—21.Google Scholar
HOOD, S.1976. The Mallia gold pendant: wasps or bees?, in (eds) EMMISON, F.. and STEVENS, R.. Tribute to an Antiquary (London), 59—72.Google Scholar
KITCHELL, K.F.1978. The Mallia ‘wasp’ pendant and Zeus Kretagenes, paper presented to Archaeological Institute of America, 28 December 1978. Abstract in AIA Abstracts, Vol. 3, 2.Google Scholar
LAFLEUR, R.et al. 1979. A re-examination of the Mallia insect pendant,AFA, LXXXIII,208—12.Google Scholar
MARINATOS, S.1970. Crete and Mycenae (New York).Google Scholar
MATZ, F.1962. The art of Crete and Early Greece (New York).Google Scholar
PENDLEBURY, J.D.S.1939. The archaeology of Crete (London).Google Scholar
RANSOME, H.M.1937. The sacred bee (London).Google Scholar
RICHARDS, O.W.1974. The Cretan ‘hornet’ pendant,Antiquity, XLVIII,222.Google Scholar
RICHARDS, O.W.1975. Reply to Davenport,Antiquity, XLIX,213.Google Scholar
ROBERT-TORNOW, W.1893. De Apium Mellisque apud Veteres Significatione (Berlin).Google Scholar
SPANAKIS, S.. No date. Crete: a guide (Heraklion).Google Scholar
WARREN, P.1975. The Aegean civilizations (Oxford).Google Scholar
WILLETTS, R.F.1962. Cretan cults and festivals (London).Google Scholar
ÇAMBEL, H.. & BRAIDWOOD, R.J..1980.Prehistoric research in Southeastern Anatolia, I (Istanbul, Univ. of Istanbul, Faculty of Letters Press, 2589).Google Scholar
CAUVIN, J.1977. Les fouilles de Mureybet (1971—1974) etleur signification pour les origines de la Sédentarisation au Proche-Orient,Ann. Am. Scho. Orient. Res., XLIV,19—48.Google Scholar
HAINES, R.C.1971. Excavations in the Plain of Antioch, II: the structural remains of the later phases, (O.I.P., xcv, Chicago).Google Scholar
KENYON, K.1957. Reply to Professor Braidwood,Antiquity, XXXI, 82—4.Google Scholar
TAX, S. (ed.). 1945. Human origins: an introductory general course in anthropology (Chicago, Univ. of Chicago Bookstore—out of print).Google Scholar
WATERBOLK, H.T.1971. Working with radiocarbon dates,Proc. Prehist. Soc., XXXVII,15—33.Google Scholar
WATSON, P.J.1979. Archaeological ethnology in Western Iran, Viking Fund Pub. Anthrop. 57. (Tucson).Google Scholar
WRIGHT, H.E., Jr.1968. Natural environment of early food production North of Mesopotamia,Science, CLXI,334—9.Google Scholar
VAN ZEIST, W.. & BOTTEMA, S..1977. Palynological investigations in Western Iran,Paleohistoria, XIX,19—85.Google Scholar
LAL, B.B.1954 & 1955. Excavations at Hastināpura and other explorations, 1950—52, Ancient India, nos. 10 & 11,4—151.Google Scholar
LAL, B.B.1975—6. Problems of Indian archaeology: planning ahead,Purdtāttva, no. 8, 126—31.Google Scholar
LAL, B.B.1976. Mahābhārata and archaeology, in (eds) GUPTA, S.P.. & RAMACHARANDRAN,, K.S.. Mahābharāta: myth and reality (Delhi).Google Scholar
LAL, B.B.1980. Did the Painted Grey Ware continue up to the Mauryan times ?Purātattva, no. 9,64—80.Google Scholar
HAYCHAUDHURY, H.1972. Political history of Ancient India (Calcutta, 7th ed.).Google Scholar
SANKALIA, H.D.1973. Rāmāyana: myth or reality (New Delhi).Google Scholar
SUKHTHANKAR, V.S.. (ed.). 1933. The Māhābharata, critical edition,I (Poona).Google Scholar
WINTERNITZ, M.1927. A history of Indian literature, I (Calcutta).Google Scholar
GIOT, p.-R.1971. The impact of radiocarbon dating . . .,Proc. Prehist. Soc., XXXVIL (2), 208.Google Scholar
GIOT, P.-R.L’HELGOUACH, J.. & MONNIER, J.L..1979. La préhistoire de la Bretagne (Rennes).Google Scholar
LE ROUZIC, Z.1909. Tumulus à Dolmen de Er Grah et Le Grand Menhir Brisé,Bull. Soc. Pol. du Morbihan.Google Scholar
LE ROUZIC, Z.1965. (ed. M. Jacq.). Inventaire des monuments mégalithiques de la région de Camac,Bull. Soc Pol. du Morbihan.Google Scholar
L’HELGOUACH, J.1965. Les sépultures mégalithiques en Armorique (Rennes).Google Scholar
LUKIS, W.C.1875. A guide to the chambered barrows, etc., of South Brittany (Ripon).Google Scholar
MERLET, R.1974. Exposé du systéme solsticial néolithique . . ., Travaux du Laboratoire d’Anthropologie, University de Rennes.Google Scholar
MILN, J.1881. Excavations at Carnac: the alignments of Kermario (Edinburgh).Google Scholar
PATRICK, J.. & BUTLER, C.J..1974. On the interpretation of the Carnac menhirs . . .,Irish Archaeological Research Forum, I (2), 29—39, and III (1) 33—3.Google Scholar
ROLLANDO, Y.1971. La préhistoire du Morbihan (Vannes).Google Scholar