Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:39:44.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bones chewed by canids as evidence for human excarnation: a British case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Martin Smith
Martin Smith*
Affiliation:
*Insitute of Archaeology and Antiquity, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Excarnation – the exposure of a corpse for stripping and possible dispersal by birds and animals – is a burial rite known from ethnographic analogy. Detecting its occurrence in the past is another matter. Here the author proposes the marking of bones by dogs and other canids as evidence of excarnation, using a British Neolithic case study.

Keywords

NeolithicBritainfunerary practicechambered tomblong barrowexcarnationscavenging
Type
Method
Information
Antiquity , Volume 80 , Issue 309 , 1 September 2006 , pp. 671 - 685
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archaeology Review. 1996–1997. Longstone Edge, Derbyshire, Excavation for Management. 4.13.1. http://www.eng-h.gov.uk/ArchRev/rev96 7/long.htm downloaded 26/01/05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armour-Chelu, M. 1998. The Human Bone, in Pryor, F. (ed.) Etton, Excavations at a Neolithic Causewayed Enclosure near Maxey, Cambridgeshire 1982–7: 271–2. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Barber, J. 1988. Isbister, Quanterness and Point of Cott: The Formulation and Testing of Some Middle Range Theories, in Barrett, J.C. & Kinnes, I.A. (ed.) The Archaeology of Context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: Recent Trends: 57–62. Sheffield: University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Barclay, G.J. & Russell-White, C.. 1993. Excavations in the Ceremonial Complex of the Fourth to Second Millennium BC at Balfarg/Balbirnie, Glenrothes, Fife. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 123: 43–210.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 1988. The Living, the Dead and the Ancestors: Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Mortuary Practices, in Barrett, J.C. & Kinnes, I.A. (ed.) The Archaeology of Context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: Recent Trends: 30–41. Sheffield: University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Bate, D.M.A. 1938. Animal Remains from the Nympsfield Long Barrow, in E.M. Clifford. The Excavation of Nympsfield Long Barrow, Gloucestershire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 4: 188–213.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1981. Bones, Ancient Men and Modern Myths. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brickley, M. & Thomas, R.. 2004. The Young Woman and her Baby or the Juvenile and their Dog: Re-interpreting Osteological Material from a Neolithic Long Barrow. Archaeological Journal 161: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buikstra, J.E. & Ubelaker, D.H.. 1994. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Arkansas: Arkansas Archaeological Survey.Google Scholar
Carr, G.C. & Knüsel, C.K.. 1997. The Ritual Framework of Excarnation by Exposure as the Mortuary Practice of the Early and Middle Iron Ages of Central Southern Britain, in Gwilt, A. & Haselgrove, C. (ed.) Reconstructing Iron Age Societies: New Approaches to the British Iron Age: 167–73. Oxbow Monograph 71. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Darvill, T. 1996. Prehistoric Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Darvill, T. 2004. Long Barrows of the Cotswolds and Surrounding Areas. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Darvill, T.C & Grinsell, L.V.. 1989. Gloucestershire Barrows: a Supplement 1961–1988, with a Gazetteer of Ring Ditches Compiled by Isobel Smith. Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucester Archaeological Society. 107: 39–105.Google Scholar
Denison, S. (ed.). 2000. In Brief: Neolithic Tomb. British Archaeology 56 http://www.britarch.ac.uk/ba/ba56news.html downloaded 26/01/05Google Scholar
Donovan, H.E. 1938. Adlestrop Hill, Gloucestershire. Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucester Archaeological Society 61: 152–64.Google Scholar
Gardiner, C.I. 1936. Adlestrop Hill Barrow, Second Report. Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucester Archaeological Society 26: 104.Google Scholar
Garton, D., Howard, A. & Pearce, M.. 1997. Archaeological Investigations at Langford Quarry, Nottinghamshire 1995–96. Tarmac Papers 1: 29–40.Google Scholar
Greenwell, W. 1877. British Barrows, A Record of the Sepulchral Monuments in Various Parts of England. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haglund, W.D. 1997. Rodents and Human Remains, in Haglund, W. & Sorg, M. (ed.) Forensic Taphonomy, the Postmortem Fate of Human Remains: 405–14. London: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Haglund, W.D., Reay, D.T. & Swindler, D.R.. 1989. Canid Scavenging/Disarticulation Sequence of Human Remains in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Forensic Sciences 34: 587–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertz, R. 1960. Death and the Right Hand. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Huntington, R. & Metcalf, P.. 1991. Celebrations of Death, the Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, A. 1998. Where Eagles Dare: Landscape, Animals and the Neolithic of Orkney. Journal of Material Culture. 3: 301–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrick, G. 1988. The Rollright Stones: Megaliths, Monuments and Settlement in the Prehistoric Landscape. London: HBMCE.Google Scholar
Mercer, R. & Healy, F.. 2004. Hambledon Hill, the View from 2004. Past 48: 10–12.Google Scholar
Morse, D., Duncan, J. & Stoutamire, J.. 1983. Handbook of Forensic Archaeology and Anthropology. Florida: Tallahassee.Google Scholar
Morton, R.J. & Lord, W.D.. 2002. Detection of Abducted and Murdered Children: Behavioural and Taphonomic Influences, in Haglund, W.D. & Sorg, M. (ed.) Advances in Forensic Taphonomy – Method, Theory and Archaeological Perspectives: 151–72. London: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Murad, T.A. 1997. The Utilization of Faunal Evidence in the Recovery of Human Remains, in Haglund, W. & Sorg, M. (ed.) Forensic Taphonomy, the Postmortem Fate of Human Remains: 359–404. London: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Murad, T.A. & Boddy, M.A.. 1987. A Case with Bear Facts. Journal of Forensic Sciences 32: 1819–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rideout, S. 1997. Excavation of Neolithic Enclosures at Cowie Road, Bannockburn, Stirling. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 127: 29–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, M.L., Shahrom, A.W., Chapman, R.C. & Vanezis, P.. 1994. Postmortem Injuries by Indoor Pets. The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 15: 105–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saville, A. 1990. Hazleton North: the Excavation of a Neolithic Long Cairn of the Cotswold Severn Group. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Scheuer, L. & Black, S.. 2000 Developmental Juvenile Osteology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J.G. 1992. Mortuary Structures and Megaliths, in Sharples, N. & Sheridan, A. (ed.) Vessels for the Ancestors: 104–19. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M.J. & Brickley, M.B.. 2004. Analysis and Interpretation of Flint Toolmarks found on Bones from West Tump Long Barrow, Gloucestershire. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 14: 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.J. 2005. Picking up the Pieces – an Investigation of Cotswold Severn Funerary Practices via Re-Analysis of Human Skeletal Material from Selected Monuments. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Tsokos, M. & Schultz, F.. 1999. Indoor Postmortem Animal Interference by Carnivores and Rodents: Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature. International Journal of Legal Medicine 112: 115–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittle, A. 1990. A Pre-enclosure Burial at Windmill Hill, Wiltshire. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 9: 25–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, P. & Snyder, L.M.. 1989. Canid Modification of Human Remains: Implications for Time – Since- Death Estimations. Journal of Forensic Sciences 34: 894–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witts, G.B. 1881. Description of the Long Barrow called ‘West Tump’ in the Parish of Brimpsfield, Gloucestershire. Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucester Archaeological Society 5: 201–11.Google Scholar
Wysocki, M. & Whittle, A.. 1998. Parc le Breos Cwm Transepted Long Cairn, Gower, West Glamorgan, Date, Contents and Context. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 64: 139–82.Google Scholar