Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:28:18.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Archaeology, e-publication and the Semantic Web

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Julian D. Richards*
Affiliation:
*Department of Archaeology, King's Manor, University of York, UK (Email: [email protected]).

Extract

In 1996 ‘Internet Archaeology’, the first peer-reviewed e-journal for Archaeology, published its first edition (Heyworth et al. 1997). Later the same year the Archaeology Data Service, the first digital archive for archaeology, was established (Richards 1997). Ten years on, this paper examines the rapid changes which have taken place in electronic publication and looks forward to the next ten years. It examines the pressures on traditional journal publication, and discusses the potential impact on Archaeology of the next Internet revolution, the Semantic Web.

Type
Debate
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, T. 2005. XML: the way forward. CSA Newsletter 18 (2): http://csanet.org/newsletter/fall05/nlf0501.html Google Scholar
Bell, T. & Eiteljorg, H. III. 2006. Stillmore on XML-finding a common ground. CSA Newsletter 18 (3): http://csanet.org/newsletter/winter06/nlw0601.html Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, T. 1998. Semantic Web road map. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, T. 1999. Weaving the Web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web by its inventor. San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. & Lassila, O.. 2001. The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284 (5): 34ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, M.H.O. 2005. Editorial. Antiquity 79: 757–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crescioli, M., D'Andrea, A. & Niccolucci, F.. 2002. XML encoding of archaeological unstructured data, in Burenhult, G. (ed.) Archaeological Informatics: Pushing the Envelope, (BAR International Series 1016): 267–74. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Cripps, P., Greenhalgh, A., Fellows, D., May, K. & Robinson, D.. 2004. Ontological modelling of the work of the Centre for Archaeology. CIDOC CRM Technical Paper. http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/technical papers.html Google Scholar
Day, M. 2001. E-print services and long-term access to the record of scholarly and scientific research. Ariadne 28: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue28/metadata/ Google Scholar
Doerr, M. & Crofts, N.. 1999. Electronic Esperanto: The role of the object-orientated CIDOC Reference Model, in D. Bearman and J. Trant (ed.) Cultural Heritage Informatics 1999: Selected papers from ichim99: 157–73, and at http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/doerr crofts ichim99_new.pdf Google Scholar
Doerr, M., Hunter, J. & Lagoze, C.. 2003. Towards a core ontology for information integration. Journal of Digital Information 4 (1): http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v04/i01/Doerr/ Google Scholar
Eiteljorg, H. III 2005. XML, databases, and standardized terminology for archaeological data. CSA Newsletter 18 (1): http://csanet.org/newsletter/spring05/nls0501.html Google Scholar
Falkingham, G. 2005. A whiter shade of grey: a new approach to archaeological grey literature using the XML version of the TEI guidelines. Internet Archaeology 17: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue17/falkingham index.html Google Scholar
FISH 2005. FISH interoperability toolkit. http://heritage-standards.org/ Google Scholar
Gill, T. 2004. Building semantic bridges between museums, libraries and archives: the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. First Monday 9 (5): http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_5/gill/index.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsparg, P. 1995. Who is responsible? in Okerson, A. & O'Donnell, J. (ed.), Scholarly journals at the crossroads: a subversive proposal for electronic publishing, Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1995. http://www.arl.org/scomm/subversive/sub03.html Google Scholar
Gray, J. & Walford, K.. 1999. One good site deserves another: Electronic publishing in field archaeology. Internet Archaeology 7: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue7/gray_index.html Google Scholar
Hardman, C. & Richards, J.D.. 2003. OASIS: Dealing with the digital revolution, in Doerr, M. & Sarris, A. (ed.) CAA2002: The Digital Heritage of Archaeology: 325–8. Hellenic Ministry of Culture.Google Scholar
Harnad, S. 2001. The self-archiving initiative. Nature 410: 1024–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harnad, S. & Hey, J.. 1995. Esoteric knowledge: the scholar and scholarly publishing on the Net, in Dempsey, L., Law, D. & Mowat, I. (ed.) Networking and the future of libraries 2: managing the intellectual record: 110–16.Google Scholar
Heyworth, M.P., Garside-Neville, S., Richards, J.D. & Vince, A.G.. 1997. Internet Archaeology: a quality electronic journal. Antiquity 71: 1039–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, J., Ore, C.-E. & Eide, O.. 2004. Documenting two histories at once: digging into archaeology, in Enter the Past: The E-way into the four dimensions of cultural heritage (BAR International Series 1227): 221–4. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Huggett, J. 2004a. Archaeology and the new technological fetishism. Archeologia e Calcolatori 15: 8192.Google Scholar
Huggett, J. 2004b. The past in bits: towards an archaeology of information technology, in Huggett, J. & Ross, S. (ed.) Archaeological Informatics: Beyond Technology. Internet Archaeology 15: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue15/huggett_index.html Google Scholar
Jones, S., MacSween, A., Jeffrey, S., Morris, R. & Heyworth, M.. 2003. From the ground up. The publication of archaeological projects: a user needs survey. A summary. York: Council For British Archaeology; also available in Internet Archaeology 14: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue14/puns index.html Google Scholar
Kilbride, W. 2004. The Danube in prehistory in the digital age: Towards a common information environment for European archaeology. Archeologia e Calcolatori 15: 129–44.Google Scholar
Kilbride, W. 2005. Past, present and future: XML, archaeology and digital preservation. CSA Newsletter 18 (3): http://csanet.org/newsletter/winter05/nlw0502.html Google Scholar
Kintigh, K. 2005. The promise and challenge of archaeological data integration. Final Report of the Workshop, Santa Barbara, unpublished.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, D. 2006. Delivering open access: From promise to practice. Ariadne 46: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue46/law/.Google Scholar
Meckseper, C. & Warwick, C.. 2003. The publication of archaeological excavation reports using XML. Literary and Linguistic Computing 18 (1): 6375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OpCit 2006. The effect of open access and downloads (‘hits’) on citation impact: a bibliography of studies. The Open Citation Project, http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.htmlGoogle Scholar
Richards, J.D. 1997. Preservation and re-use of digital data: the role of the Archaeology Data Service. Antiquity 71: 1057–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J.D. 2002. Digital preservation and access. European Journal of Archaeology 5: 343–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J.D. 2004. Online archives, in Huggett, J. & Ross, S. (ed.) Archaeological Informatics: Beyond Technology. Internet Archaeology 15: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue15/richards_index.html Google Scholar
Richards, J.D. 2006. Electronic publication in archaeology, in Evans, T.L. & Daly, P. (ed.) Digital Archaeology: bridging method and theory: 213–25. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ross, S. 2003. Position paper, in Towards a Semantic Web for heritage resources, DigiCULT Thematic Issue 3: 711, also available online at: http://www.digicult.info/downloads/ti3_high.pdf Google Scholar