Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:03:17.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ancient China reconsidered

Review products

Katheryn M.Linduff, YanSun, WeiCao & YuanqingLiu. 2018. Ancient China and its Eurasian neighbors: artifacts, identity, and death in the frontier, 3000–700 BCE. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press; 978-1-108-41861-4 £85.

RoderickCampbell. 2018. Violence, kinship and the early Chinese state: the Shang and their world. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press; 978-1-107-19761-9 £75.

XiaolongWu. 2017. Material culture, power, and identity in ancient China. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press; 978-1-107-13402-7 £85.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2018

Magnus Fiskesjö*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, McGraw Hall 201, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA (Email: [email protected])

Extract

These three ambitious, successful and highly rewarding books help us to rethink the archaeology of ancient China and its context. The work co-authored by Linduff, Sun, Cao and Liu is the most wide-ranging. It offers an overview of ancient Chinese interactions with Central Asian neighbours over more than two millennia, from the first beginnings of metal use up to the Iron Age. It also aims to change the narrative of this region by re-interpreting the ‘Inner Asian frontier’ as a multi-centred, dynamic, diverse and changing ‘contact zone’ unlike the uniform barbarian steppe set apart from incipient Chinese civilization that an earlier literature tended to imagine. The authors focus on distinct yet overlapping aspects of life and interaction on this frontier—‘technoscapes’, ‘individualscapes’, ‘lineagescapes’, ‘regionscapes’—departing from the Sinocentric view where the only interesting questions about ancient frontier peoples were how the barbarians contributed (or not), to the making of the (glory of the) Sino-centres. The recent exciting debates over the Shimao “city too far north” (Jaang et al. 2018) come to mind!

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Etkind, A. 2011. Internal colonization: Russia's imperial experience. Cambridge & Malden (MA): Polity.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. 1998. System, structure and contradiction in the evolution of ‘Asiatic’ social formations (2nd edition). Walnut Creek (CA): Altamira-Sage.Google Scholar
Jaang, L., Sun, Z., Shao, J. & Li, M.. 2018. When peripheries were centres: a preliminary study of the Shimao-centred polity in the loess highland, China. Antiquity 92: 1008–22. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.31Google Scholar
Keightley, D. 2000. The ancestral landscape: time, space, and community in Late Shang China (ca. 1200–1045 B.C.). Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 2017. Godfrey Lienhardt as a skeptic; or, anthropology as conceptual puzzle-solving. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7: 351–75. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.2.031Google Scholar
Yao, A. 2016. The ancient highlands of southwest China: from the Bronze Age to the Han Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199367344.001.0001Google Scholar