Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:40:07.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analytical approaches in maritime archaeology: a Mediterranean perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

David Gibbins
David Gibbins*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Introduction

If maritime archaeology, ‘the scientific study of the material remains of man and his activities on the sea’ (Muckelroy 1978: 4), is to be regarded usefully as a subdiscipline, then a major unifying factor must be the existence of common methodologies applicable to the study of shipwrecks irrespective of their date and location. The special conditions of work underwater are by themselves inadequate grounds for distinction, as has now long been recognized (Bass 1966). Instead it is in aspects of analysis and explanation of wreck data that the subject may be set apart.

Consideration of the nature of ships and shipwrecks suggests the groundwork for a unitary methodology. Ships as structures, or as ‘self-regulating machines’ (Muckelroy 1978: 216–19), present universal features of construction and design; common environmental and technological parameters explain the closely similar development of nautical technologies in disparate societies and seas. The usual reasons for seafaring, for trade, travel, warfare, and fishing, can be seen to create standardized assemblages of shipboard material, of comparrable forms and lading arrangement. And fundamental regularities occur in the event of shipwreck and the underwater process of site formation. As the basis for analytical tools, the models allowed by these characteristics should clearly be open to more refinement as one concentrates on the data of particular maritime activities and regions.

Type
Special Maritime Section
Information
Antiquity , Volume 64 , Issue 243 , June 1990 , pp. 376 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldaque de Silva, A.A. 1891. Estado actual das Pescas em Portugal. Lisboa.Google Scholar
Basch, L. 1972. Ancient wrecks and the archaeology of ships, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 1: 1–58.Google Scholar
Bass, G.F. 1966. Archaeology under water. London, Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Bass, G.F. 1967. Cape Gelidonya: a Bronze Age shipwreck. Philadelphia (PA): American Philosophical Society. Transactions 57.8.Google Scholar
Bass, G.F. 1983. A plea for historical particularism in nautical archaeology in Gould: 91–104.Google Scholar
Bass, G.F. & van Doorninck, F.H. Jr., 1982. Yassi Ada 1: a seventh century Byzantine shipwreck. College Station (TX): Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1978. Nunamuit ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1981. Bones: ancient men and modern myths. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Bound, M. 1985. Amphorae from the harbour of Lilybaeum. Progress in Underwater Science 10: 135–57.Google Scholar
Bound, M. 1986. Observations on the direction of underwater archaeological projects abroad, in Palmer, R. (ed.), Underwater expeditions: 76–124. London: Royal Geographical Society — Expeditions Advisory Centre.Google Scholar
Braudel, F. 1966. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean world in the age of Philip II. London: Fontana-Collins.Google Scholar
Casson, L. 1971. Ships and seamanship in the ancient world. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Claasen, C. 1983. Answering our questions with experiments, in Gould: 189–206.Google Scholar
Clarke, D.L. 1968. Analytical archaeology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Cockrell, W.A. 1983. A trial classifactory model for the analysis of shipwrecks, in Gould: 207–17.Google Scholar
Dumas, F. 1972. Ancient wrecks, in UNESCO: 27–34.Google Scholar
Frost, H. 1962. Submarine archaeology and Mediterranean wreck formation, Mariners’ Mirror 48: 82–9.Google Scholar
Gianfrotta, P.A. & Pomey, P.. 1980. Archeologia subacquea: storia, tecniche, scoperte e relitti. Milan: Borghese.Google Scholar
Gibbins, D.J.L. 1987. Review [of Peacock & Williams (1986)], Libyan Studies 18: 154–6.Google Scholar
Gibbins, D.J.L. 1989. The Roman wreck of c. AD 200 at Plemmirio, near Siracusa (Sicily): second interim report. The domestic assemblage 1: medical equipment and pottery lamps, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 18: 1–25.Google Scholar
Gibbins, D.J.L. In press. A Greek amphora wreck of the late 2nd century AD at Terrauzza, near Siracusa (Sicily): second interim report, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology.Google Scholar
Gibbins, D.J.L. & Parker., A.J. 1986. The Roman wreck of c. AD 200 at Plemmirio, near Siracusa (Sicily): interim report, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 15: 267–304.Google Scholar
Gibbon, E. 1989. Explanation in archaeology. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gould, R.A. (ed.). 1983. Shipwreck anthropology. Albuquerque (NM): University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Hesnard, A., et al. 1988. L’epave romaine Grand Ribaud D (Hyeres, Var). Archaeonautica 8.Google Scholar
Hodder, I.R. 1986. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houston, G.W. 1988. Ports in perspective: some comparative materials on Roman merchant ships and ports, American Journal of Archaeology 92: 553–64.Google Scholar
Keller, C. 1976. Four methodological groups of underwater archaeological sites, in Adolfson, J. (ed.), Underwater 75: 101–10. Stockholm: SMR Committee for Underwater Technology, Google Scholar
Lenihan, D.J. 1983. Rethinking shipwreck archaeology: a history of ideas and considerations for new directions, in Gould, : 37–64.Google Scholar
McGrail, S. 1977. Aspects of experimental boat archaeology, in McGrail, S. (ed.), Sources and techniques in boat archaeology: 23–45. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. British series 29.Google Scholar
McGrail, S. 1989. The shipment of traded goods and of ballast in antiquity, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 8: 353–8.Google Scholar
Mediterranean Pilot. 1978. Volumes 1-4. 10th edition. London: Ministry of Defence Hydrographic Department.Google Scholar
Merton, R.H. 1968. Social theory and social structure. 3rd edition. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Muckelroy, K.W. 1975. A systematic approach to the investigation of scattered wreck sites, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 4: 173–90.Google Scholar
Muckelroy, K.W. 1976. The integration of historical and archaeological data concerning an historic wreck site: the Kennemerland, World Archaeology 7: 280–90.Google Scholar
Muckelroy, K.W. 1977. Historic wreck sites in Britain and their environments, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 6: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muckelroy, K.W. 1978. Maritime archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muckelroy, K.W. 1981. Middle Bronze Age trade between Britain and Europe: a maritime perspective, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 47: 275–97.Google Scholar
Muckelroy, K.W. & Baker., P. 1979. The Bronze Age site off Moor Sand, near Salcombe, Devon: an interim report on the 1978 season, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 8: 189–210.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. 1983. Shipwrecks as data base for human behavioural studies, in Gould, : 65–90.Google Scholar
Nesteroff, W.D. 1972. Geological aspects of marine sites, in UNESCO: 175–83.Google Scholar
Parker, A.J. 1979. Method and madness: wreck hunting in shallow water, Progress in Underwater Science 4: 7–27.Google Scholar
Parker, A.J. 1980. The preservation of ships and artefacts in ancient Mediterranean wreck sites, Progress in Underwater Science 5: 41–70.Google Scholar
Parker, A.J. 1981. Stratification and contamination in ancient Mediterranean shipwrecks, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 10: 309–35.Google Scholar
Parker, A.J. 1984. Shipwrecks and ancient trade in the Mediterranean, Archaeological Review from Cambridge 3: 99–113.Google Scholar
Peacock, D.P.S. 1982. Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnaarchaeological approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Peacock, D.P.S. & Williams., D.W. 1986. Amphorae and the Roman economy: an introductory guide. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Pomey, P., et al. 1988. Recherches sous-marines, Gallia Informations 1: 2–78.Google Scholar
Raab, M.L. & Goodyear., A.C. 1984. Middle-range theory in archaeology: a critical review of the origins and applications, American Antiquity 49: 255–68.Google Scholar
Raban, A. 1973. Survival of ancient wrecks in various conditions off the coast near Israel, in Flemming, N.C. (ed.), Science diving international (Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium of the CMAS Scientific Committee): 282–92. London: British Sub-Aqua Club.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A.C. 1980. The great tradition versus the great divide: archaeology as anthropology, American Journal of Archaeology 84: 287–98.Google Scholar
Rouge, J. 1984. Le confort des passengers á bord des navires antiques, Archaeonautica 4: 223–43.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B. 1976. Behavioral archaeology. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A.M. 1985. The New Archaeology and the classical archaeologist, American Journal of Archaeology 89: 31–7.Google Scholar
Steffy, J.R. 1985. The Kyrenia ship: an interim report on its hull construction, American Journal of Archaeology 89: 71–101.Google Scholar
Stickel, E.G. 1983. The mystery of the prehistoric ‘Chinese anchors’: towards a research design for underwater archaeology, in Gould: 219–44.Google Scholar
Tchernia, A. et al. 1978. L’epave romaine de la Madragne de Giens (Var) (Campagnes 1972–1975). Paris: Éditions de CNRS. Fouilles de I’lnstitut d’Archéologie Méditerraneéene. Gallia suppl. 34.Google Scholar
Tenenti, A. 1959. Naufrages, corsaires et assurances maritimes à Venise, 1592-1609. Paris: École Pratique des Hautes Études — 6e Section, Centre de Recherches Historiques.Google Scholar
Throckmorton, P. 1973. Ships and shipwrecks: the archaeology of ships, in Blackman, D. (ed.), Marine archaeology: 493–520. London: Butterworths. Colston Papers 23.Google Scholar
Throckmorton, P. (ed.). 1987. History from the sea: shipwrecks and archaeology. London, Mitchell Beazley.Google Scholar
Trasselli, C. 1962. Les sources d’archives pour l’histoire du trafic maritime en Sicilie, in Mollat, M. (ed.), Les sources de I’histoire maritime en Europe, du Moyen Age au 18e siècle: 107–8. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
UNESCO (ed.), Underwater archaeology: a nascent discipline. Paris: UNESCO Google Scholar
Watson, P.J. 1983. Method and theory in shipwreck archaeology. in Gould: 23–36.Google Scholar
Willey, G. & Sabloff., J. 1980. A history of American archaeology. 2nd edition. San Francisco (CA): W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar