Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:29:17.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of spatial patterns in buildings (access analysis) as an insight into social structure: examples from the Scottish Atlantic Iron Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Sally M. Foster
Sally M. Foster*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, The University, Glasgow G12 8QQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Clearly the pattern of space in buildings can be expected to relate to the way that buildings are used to structure and reproduce social relations. As an archaeologist, wishing to infer social structure by its reflection in the building pattern, one may hope the relation may be reasonably direct. Here the formal geometrical method of access analysis is used to elucidate the pattern in a distinctive kind of prehistoric settlement form, and thence to elucidate the social structure which both produced it and was structured by it.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 63 , Issue 238 , March 1989 , pp. 40 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, J.C. 1988. Fields of Discourse: reconstituting a social archaeology, Critique of Anthropology 7:3 (1987–8): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J.C. Forthcoming. Food, gender and metal: questions of social reproduction, in Stig-Sørensen, M.-L. & Thomas, R (ed.), The transition from bronze to iron. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Batty, M. 1985. Review of Hillier & Hanson (1984), Sociology 19: 161–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boast, R. & Evans, C.. 1986 The transformation of space: two examples from British prehistory, in Boast & Yiannouli (1986): 193–205.Google Scholar
Boast, R. & Yiannouli, E. (ed.). 1986. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 5(2): Creating space.Google Scholar
Carter, S.P., Haigh, D., Neil, N.R.J. & Smith, B.. 1984. Interim report on the structures at Howe, Stromness, Orkney, Glasgow Archaeological Journal 11: 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callander, J.G., & Grant, W.G.. 1934. The broch of Mid Howe, Rousay, Orkney, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 68 (1933–4): 444–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1984. The division of labour in society. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairhurst, H. 1984. Excavations at Crosskirk broch, Caithness. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. 1977. Settlement studies (micro and semimicro), in Clarke, D.L. (ed.), Spatial archaeology: 47–162. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, R. 1988. The spatial archaeology of gender: a case study of medieval English nunneries, Archaeological Review from Cambridge 7(1): 21–8.Google Scholar
Glassie, H. 1975. Folk housing in middle Virginia: a structural analysis of historic artefacts. University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Graves, C.P. Forthcoming. Social space in the English medieval parish church.Google Scholar
Gregory, D 1978. Social change and spatial structures, in Carlstein, T., Parkes, D. & Thrift, N. (ed.), Making sense of time: 38–46. New York: Halsted Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, D. & Urry, J. (ed.). 1985. Social relations and spatial structure. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselgrove, C 1984 Comment on Hingley, Scottish Archaeological Review 3(1): 27–30.Google Scholar
Hedges, J. 1987. Bu, Gurness and the Brochs of Orkney. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. British Series 163.Google Scholar
Hillier, B. n.d. Instructions to students at Bartlett School of Architecture. Typescript.Google Scholar
Hillier, B. & Hanson, J.. 1984. The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. 1978. Does space syntax really ‘constitute the social’?, in Green, D., Haselgrove, C. & Spriggs, C. (ed.), Social organisation and settlement: contributions from anthropology: 385–401. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International Series 471.Google Scholar
Mackie, E. 1987. The Scottish brochs: Iron Age manor houses. Paper presented Edinburgh, January 1987.Google Scholar
Markus, T.A. (ed.). 1982. Order in space and society. Edinburgh: Mainstream Google Scholar
Norberg-Schulz, C. 1971. Existence, space and architecture. London: Studio Vista.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.P. & Inhelder, B.. 1956. The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rcams. 1946. Twelfth report with an inventory of the ancient monuments of Orkney and Shetland. Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
Smith, J.T. 1978. Villas as a key to social structure, in Todd, M. (ed.), Studies in the Romano-British villa: 149–173. Leicester: Leicester University Press Google Scholar
Yiannouli, E. & Mithen, S.. 1986. The real and random architecture of Siphnos: analysing house plans using simulation, in Boast & Yiannouli (1986): 167–80.Google Scholar