Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:06:00.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Archaeological Perspective on Eskimo Economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

William E. Taylor Jr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article attempts to highlight certain qualities of the Eskimo economy seen in overview and, if it repeats some anthropological clichés, perhaps the repetition will serve a purpose for clichés, despite their shortcomings, often become such by an innate worth. Further, some used here seem to have been largely forgotten in recent literature on Eskimo prehistory. A rare exception, and a point of departure for this article, was recently offered by Collins, who notes, 'In America, however, there is sometimes a tendency to see an overly close relationship between specific cultural manifestations and particular kinds of environment, and to overemphasize the role of environment in the dissemination of culture. In the Eskimo field this point of view is reflected in the related concept of a rather sharp dichotomy between inland and coast, with the former the center of origin—a kind of fata morgana that has beset Eskimo archaeology for decades and which still exerts its residual influence, even though the concept in its original elaborated form no longer finds acceptance.' (Collins, 1962, 134.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 40 , Issue 158 , June 1966 , pp. 114 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banfield, A. W. F. 1961. ‘A revision of the reindeer and caribou, genus Rangifer’, National Museum of Canada Bull. No. 177.Google Scholar
Birket-Smith, Kaj. 1929. ‘The Caribou Eskimo’, Report of the 5th Thule Expedition, 1921–4, vol. 5.Google Scholar
Birket-Smith, Kaj. 1959. The Eskimos. (Methuen, London).Google Scholar
Campbell, John M. 1962. ‘Cultural succession at Anaktuvuk Pass, Arctic Alaska’ in (ed.) Campbell, John M., Prehistoric Cultural relations between the Arctic and temperate zones of North America Technical Paper No. 11, Arctic Institute of North America, 39–54.Google Scholar
Collins, Henry B. 1937. ‘Archaeology of St. Lawrence Island, Alaska’, Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, vol. 96, no. 1.Google Scholar
Collins, Henry B. 1954. ‘The position of Ipiutak in Eskimo culture-reply’, American Antiquity, XX, no. I, 79–84.Google Scholar
Collins, Henry B. 1956a. ‘Archaeological investigations on Southampton and Coats Islands, N.W.T.’, National Museum of Canada, Annual Report for 1954–55, Bull. No. 142, 82–113.Google Scholar
Collins, Henry B. 1956b. Review of J. L. Giddings’s The Arctic Woodland Culture of the Kobuk River, American Antiquity, XXII, no. 2, 199–201.Google Scholar
Collins, Henry B. 1962. ‘Bering Strait to Greenland’, in (ed.) John M. Campbell (see Campbell 1962), 126–39.Google Scholar
Ford, James A. 1959. ‘Eskimo prehistory in the vicinity of Point Barrow, Alaska’, Anthropological Papers of The American Museum of Natural History, XLVII, pt. 1.Google Scholar
Giddings, James L. 1951. ‘The Denbigh flint complex’, American Antiquity, XVI, no. 3, 193–203.Google Scholar
Giddings, James L. 1952. The Arctic Woodland culture of the Kobuk River (Museum Monographs, University Museum, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
Giddings, James L. 1956. ‘A Flint site in northernmost Manitoba’, American Antiquity, XXI, no. 3, 255–68.Google Scholar
Giddings, James L. 1961. ‘Cultural Continuities of Eskimos’, American Antiquity, XXVII, no. 2, 155–73.10.2307/277832Google Scholar
Giddings, James L. 1964. The archaeology of Cape Denbigh (Brown University Press, Providence, R.I.).Google Scholar
Harp, Elmer. 1958. ‘Prehistory in the Dismal Lake area, N.W.T., Canada’, Arctic, XI, no. 4, 219–49.Google Scholar
Harp, Elmer. 1961. The Archaeology of the Lower and Middle Thelon, Northwest Territories’, Arctic Institute of North America, Technical Paper No. 8, Montreal.Google Scholar
Jenness, Diamond. 1921. ‘The cultural transformation of the Copper Eskimo’, Geographical Review, XI, no. 4, 541–50.10.2307/208249Google Scholar
Kane, E. K. 1856. Arctic Explorations, vols. 1 and 11 (Philadelphia and London).Google Scholar
Larsen, Helge and Rainey, Froelich. 1948. ‘Ipiutak and the Arctic whale hunting culture’, Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, XLII.Google Scholar
Laughlin, William S. 1963. ‘Eskimos and Aleuts: their origins and evolution’, Science, CXLII, no. 3593, 633–45.Google Scholar
Mathiassen, Therkel. 1927. ‘Archaeology of the Central Eskimos’, Report of the Fifth Thule Expedition, 1921–4, vol. 4.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Moreau S. 1960. ‘An archaeological analysis of Eastern Grant Land, Ellesmere Island, Northwest Territories’, National Museum of Canada, Bull. No. 170.Google Scholar
Meldgaard, Jorgen, 1960. ‘Origin and evolution of Eskimo cultures in the eastern Arctic’, Canadian Geographical Journal, vol. LX, 64–75.Google Scholar
Meldgaard, Jorgen, 1962. ‘On the formative period of the Dorset culture’ in (ed.) John M. Campbell (see Campbell 1962), 92–5.Google Scholar
Rink, Henry. 1887. ‘The Eskimo tribes’, Meddel. om Gronland, XI, 1–124.Google Scholar
Spencer, Robert F. 1959. ‘The North Alaskan Eskimo—a study in ecology and society’, Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 171.Google Scholar
Steensby, H. P. 1910. ‘Contributions to the ethnology and anthropogeography of the Polar Eskimos’, Meddel. om Gronland, XXXIV, 255–66.Google Scholar
Steensby, H. P. 1916. ‘An anthropogeographical study of the origin of the Eskimo culture’, Meddel. om Gronland, LIII, 41–228.Google Scholar
Taylor, William E. 1958. ‘Archaeological work in Ungava, 1957’, Arctic Circular, X, no. 2, 25–27.Google Scholar
Taylor, William E. 1962a. ‘Comments on the nature and origin of the Dorset culture’, in (ed.) Lowther, G. R., Problems of the Pleistocene and Arctic, vol. 2, no. 2 (McGill University Museums), 56–67.Google Scholar
Taylor, William E. 1962b. ‘Pre-Dorset occupations at Ivugivik in north-western Ungava’, in (ed.) John M. Campbell (see Campbell 1962).Google Scholar
Taylor, William E. 1964a. ‘The prehistory of the Quebec-Labrador Peninsula’, in Le Nouveau-Québec, Contribution à l’Etude de l’Occupation Humaine (Bibliothèque Arctique et Antarctique, Tome 2, Publication de l’Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Sorbonne), 181–210.Google Scholar
Taylor, William E. 1964b. ‘Interim account of an archaeological survey in the Central Arctic, 1963’, Anthropological papers of the University of Alaska, XII, no. I, 46–55.Google Scholar
Taylor, William E. 1965. ‘The fragments of Eskimo prehistory’, The Beaver, Spring, 1965, Outfit 295 (Winnipeg), 4–17.Google Scholar
VanStone, James W. 1962. ‘An archaeological collection from Somerset Island and Boothia Peninsula, N.W.T.’, in Occasional Paper 4 (Art and Archaeology Division, Royal Ontario Museum and University of Toronto), 1–63.Google Scholar