Article contents
Alternative models of Pleistocene biocultural evolution: a response to Foley
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2015
Extract
Human origins research has had a long history of vigorous debate. Recent discussion has been no exception, the more so perhaps as the strands of evidence — anthropological, archaeological, and now molecular-biological — are sufficiently diverse that not many can be well placed to deal fairly with them all. Here issue is taken with Foley's cladistic view of human evolution, and with the ‘Garden of Eden’ hypothesis of a single source in Africa for modern human populations.
- Type
- Notes
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1989
References
Binford, L. & Sabloff, J.. 1982. Paradigms, systematics and archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Research
38: 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, C.
1986. Modern human origins: narrow focus or broad spectrum?, American Journal of Physical Anthropology
69: 180.Google Scholar
Brace, C.
1988. The stages of human evolution: human and cultural origins. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall. 3rd edition.Google Scholar
Brace, C. In press. Medieval thinking and the paradigms of paleoanthropology, American Anthropologist
91.Google Scholar
Cann, R., Stoneking, M. & Wilson, A.. 1987. Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution, Nature
325: 31–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, G.
1988. Some thoughts on the Black Skull: an archeologist’s assessment of WT-17000 (A. boisei) and systematics in human paleontology, American Anthropologist
90: 357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. In press. Paradigms and paradoxes in paleoanthropology: a response to C. Loring Brace, American Anthropologist
91.Google Scholar
Clark, G. & Lindly, J.. In press. The case for continuity: observations on the biocultural transition in Europe and western Asia, in Mellars & Stringer (in press).Google Scholar
Falk, D.
1987. Implications of WT-17000 for hominid evolution. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists (April 1987), New York.Google Scholar
Foley, R.
1987. Hominid species and stone-tool assemblages: how are they related?, Antiquity
61: 380–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, C
1986. The Palaeolithic settlement of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goulu, S. & Eldredge, N.. 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology
3: 115–151.Google Scholar
Hanson, N.
1961. Patterns of discovery: an inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howells, W.
1976. Explaining modern man: evolutionists versus migrationists, Journal of Human Evolution
5: 477–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelinek, A.
1982. The Middle Paleolithic in the southern Levant, with comments on the appearance of modern Homo sapiens, in Ronen (1982): 57–104.Google Scholar
Jelinek, A. In press. The Amudian in the context of the Mugharan Tradition at the Tabun Cave (Mount Carmel), Israel, in Mellars & Stringer (in press).Google Scholar
Lewin, R.
1987. Bones of contention: controversies in the search for human origins. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Mellars, P. & Stringer, C. (ed.). In press. The human revolution: behavioural & biological perspectives on the origins of modern humans. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Nei, M.
1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, C.
1982. Morphological characters and homology, in Joysey, K. & Friday, A. (ed.), Problems in phylogenetic reconstruction: 21–74. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ronen, A. (ed.). 1982. The transition from Lower to Middle Palaeolithic and the origin of modern man. Oxford: BAR. International Series 151.Google Scholar
Skelton, R., Mchenry, H. & Drawhorn, G.. 1986. Phylogenetic analysis of early hominids, Current Anthropology
27: 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F.
1982. Upper Pleistocene hominid evolution in south-central Europe, Current Anthropology
23: 667–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F., Simek, J. & Harrill, M.. In press. Geographical variation in supraorbital torus reduction during the later Pleistocene (c. 80–15 kyr BP), in Mellars & Stringer (in press).Google Scholar
Smith, F. & Trinkaus, E.. In press. Modern human origins in central Europe: a case of continuity, in Hublin, J. & Tillier, A.M. (ed.), Aux Origines de la diversité humaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Straus, L. & Heller, C.. 1988. Exploration of the twilight zone: the early Upper Paleolithic in Vasco-Cantabrian Spain and Gascony, in Hoffecker, J. & Wolf, C. (ed.), The early Upper Paleolithic: evidence from Europe and the Near East: 97–134. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series 437.Google Scholar
Trinkaus, E.
1986. The neanderthals and modern human origins, Annual Review of Anthropology
15: 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, D., Garrison, K. & Knowler, W.. 1985. Dramatic founder effects in Amerindian mitochondrial DNAs, American Journal of Physical Anthropology
68: 149–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolpoff, M.
In press. Multiregional evolution: the fossil alternative to Eden, in Mellars & Stringer (in press).Google Scholar
Wolpoff, M., Wu, X. & Thorne, A.. 1984. Modern Homo sapiens origins: a general theory of hominid evolution involving the fossil evidence from east Asia, in Smith, F. & Spencer, F. (ed.), The origins of modern humans: a world survey of the fossil evidence: 411–83. New York: Alan Liss.Google Scholar
Wolpoff, M., Spuhler, J., Smith, F., Radovcic, J., Pope, G., Frayer, D., Eckhardt, R. & Clark, G.. 1988. Modern human origins, Science
291: 772–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, B. & Chamberlain, A.. 1986. Australopithecus -grade or clade?, in Wood, B.
et al. (ed.), Major topics in primate and human evolution: 220–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 10
- Cited by